Toggle sidebar

HF Habs: 2020 Montreal Canadiens Off-Season Thread part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
BLONG7

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
36,868
23,548
Nova Scotia
Visit site
The Great Weise said:
Don't care what the stats say, I've seen enough of Kulak and Mete to know that they aren't good. Even the Habs think so. Kulak was a healthy scratch for a decent amount of games and Mete had less ice time than an AHLer in the playoffs. Not saying they won't get better, but as of right now, they aren't that good.
Click to expand...
At some point, people have to look at the results, for what they are, and not what they hope them to be...........Bergevin continues to double down on alot of people, that he should not...and our results have not been pretty.
Agreed, Kulak and Mete have been just ok.......and that's being kind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miller Time
salbutera

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,192
16,981
The Great Weise said:
Don't care what the stats say, I've seen enough of Kulak and Mete to know that they aren't good. Even the Habs think so. Kulak was a healthy scratch for a decent amount of games and Mete had less ice time than an AHLer in the playoffs. Not saying they won't get better, but as of right now, they aren't that good.
Click to expand...
I find the Mete situation is comparable to analytics community losing their collective s*it (led by Andrew Berkshire) when Diaz was dealt for Weise....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ben Chariot
Pacciosoftie

Pacciosoftie

Curved Dach
Oct 26, 2017
3,420
4,087
I’d shakeup the entire team minus Suzuki/Kk/Romanov/Petry. The makeup of this team has been proven not to work. Why keep trying with the same 90% of players, who are also too small? Be willing to trade anyone and change the indentity of this team. Fed up of the Drouins, Byrons, Tatar, Danaults, Mete, etc. I’m not saying to rebuild, but make actual hockey trades and use our picks and prospects to sweeten the deal.
 
417

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,471
30,336
Ottawa
Zorba said:
Oh it is. I wouldn’t sign Danault or Tatar either
Let’s face it. The habs need a new look. If it weren’t for Covid it woulda been 3 years in a row no playoffs we don’t need these guys
Click to expand...
I don't think it's wise to not sign them all. I got no issues with signing Petry and Gallagher to extensions.

But no to Danault and Tatar. I'm recouping assets for both of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miller Time, Adam Michaels and Zorba
Adam Michaels

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
78,835
129,396
Montreal
417 said:
I don't think it's wise to not sign them all. I got no issues with signing Petry and Gallagher to extensions.

But no to Danault and Tatar. I'm recouping assets for both of them.
Click to expand...

To me, Tatar is the one I'm trading.

Danault, I'm on the fence. But at the right AAV. If not, I'm moving him.

Petry and Gallagher, I'm all for extending those two. If anything, they're two of the teams' biggest contributors to any semblance of success they have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gravity, Sterling Archer, 417 and 2 others
Montreal Impact FC

Montreal Impact FC

.:| Champ's City |:.
Jun 7, 2012
2,298
664
Montreal
Amerika said:
I'm really hating the Molson and Bergevin speech of 'We don't want to pay anyone on the market because we have to pay our kids soon.' They're talking like these guys have had Matthews/Marner/Reilly level of seasons. Holy smokes. Pump the brakes. If a move is there, you do it. You worry about paying them when they've actually become stars and you make the appropriate moves to free up the dough.
Click to expand...

what else do you expect from Marc "we are going in the right direction" Bergevin

lots of talk no much action.
 
Kriss E

Kriss E

Registered User
May 3, 2007
55,334
20,289
Jeddah
Adam Michaels said:
To me, Tatar is the one I'm trading.

Danault, I'm on the fence. But at the right AAV. If not, I'm moving him.

Petry and Gallagher, I'm all for extending those two. If anything, they're two of the teams' biggest contributors to any semblance of success they have.
Click to expand...
The only reason I'd be inclined to extend Gallagher is because he's one of the rare drafted and established internally players on our roster. Him and Price, that's it.
It's good to keep those guys around so a KK, Romanov, Caufield, Norlinder, and whoever else sees the value in sticking with the club.
 
  • Like
Reactions: salbutera
Belial

Belial

Registered User
Oct 22, 2014
26,142
14,323
Montreal
The Great Weise said:
I'm willing to bet that Tatar will age a lot better than Gallagher
Click to expand...

Why would Gallagher's game suddenly decline? He's not a great skater, he doesn't have an amazing shot... What's going to decline in his game?

As long as he can stay on his skates in front of the net he'll score goals IMO.

And with the way he's taking care of his body and training like a madman, he'll do just fine for quite some more years.

The only thing that I see as a major risk is a weird injury like a puck to the face or to the hands like he already experienced...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DAChampion
Sterling Archer

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
23,324
14,062
Adam Michaels said:
To me, Tatar is the one I'm trading.

Danault, I'm on the fence. But at the right AAV. If not, I'm moving him.

Petry and Gallagher, I'm all for extending those two. If anything, they're two of the teams' biggest contributors to any semblance of success they have.
Click to expand...
That’s the name I don’t understand isn’t being discussed as trade bait. He’d be the first player I traded to land a big, RW power forward. He doesn’t really have a future here and I have no interest in extending him at $6M+ he’d be asking for.
 
The Great Weal

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,165
70,853
Belial said:
Why would Gallagher's game suddenly decline? He's not a great skater, he doesn't have an amazing shot... What's going to decline in his game?
Click to expand...
Not being able to physically give it 110% every single shift? That's going to happen with injuries and him ageing.
 
blarneylad

blarneylad

Registered User
Feb 1, 2009
8,226
4,532
Habaneros said:
Tyler Toffoli ?did he almost trade for him one time
(Max Pac67)?lol

I hear some throw out ideas of trading with Tampa for Killorn....
Click to expand...
Condensed season having some extra bodies woudn't be a bad thing. I could see guys getting a therapy game day break much like the MLB does
 
Sasha Orlov

Sasha Orlov

Lord of the Manor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2018
8,953
21,208
Habaneros said:
they did that with Pacman67 too... he wanted 8.5 million and they shipped him out..and he got it in Vegas.

With out question tho, if Habs wont pay BGally ,another team sure will
Click to expand...
I have no problem letting Gallagher go, preferably by trade
He's great when healthy, but that's becoming pretty rare it seems. Also, it's not like that'll improve with age.
 

Habaneros

Habs Cup champs 2010
Oct 31, 2011
16,619
7,139
Sasha Orlov said:
I have no problem letting Gallagher go, preferably by trade
He's great when healthy, but that's becoming pretty rare it seems. Also, it's not like that'll improve with age.
Click to expand...

Those Shea Weber slapshots....hurt many players on his own team and others.

I love BGALLY... Pk Subban as a Habs ......I really liked Max Pac67....Halak..Patrick Roy .wasn't happy to see those guys go ...but business is business and the players know it too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sasha Orlov
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X