Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,071
- 40,921
Smilanic would piss me off so bad. Cuylle I know nothing about. Of the remainingg I would say Lundell, Holloway, Mysak, Zary, Sanderson in that order. I think we won't be in a position to grab Lundell or Holloway so Mysak or Zary would make me a very happy camper.I will say that I haven't heard his name come up as a top target to this point.
Names outside the tippy top guys that have definitely come up, multiple times, include:
Zary
Holloway
Lundell
Sanderson
Mysak
Smilanic
Cuylle
Compete level for me. Being able to raise it against higher level competition.Why?
Compete level for me. Being able to raise it against higher level competition.
I also do not like the rumors of coach-ability and how open he is to receiving instruction.
There is nothing wrong with his compete level in the SHL. Did he take shifts off while destroying SuperElit at 16/17? Yes... that happens sometimes when things go easy for teenagers.Compete level for me. Being able to raise it against higher level competition.
I also do not like the rumors of coach-ability and how open he is to receiving instruction.
I'm not too honed in on all these guys, but I think Gunler is the clear #1 and I like Myšák a lot as well. I honestly like Gunler more than Holtz, always have.How would you guys rank Gunler, Zary, Mercer, Jarvis, Mysak and Holloway?
I feel like we need to get 'our guy'. Get into the top10. A player style like Stutzle, Raymond, Rossi or Holtz would be a nice adds. Raymond has NYR written all over it IMO
We have liked players before but never had the ammo to make the move. Now we do.
I feel like we need to get 'our guy'. Get into the top10. A player style like Stutzle, Raymond, Rossi or Holtz would be a nice adds. Raymond has NYR written all over it IMO
We have liked players before but never had the ammo to make the move. Now we do.
Takes 2 to tango though.
We had shit to offer. It's easier when you can make it enticing.Takes 2 to tango though.
We had shit to offer. It's easier when you can make it enticing.
Buch, Strome, Kravtsov, Lundkvist, picks etc. IF and only IF you see a Petterson
We got assetsYeah, no team is trading down if they are in the top 10 this year. When was the last time a team with a top-10 pick traded down? I had to look it up. 2008!
At the time, if the value is fair. Obviously not Petterson now. We're not talking about him as a NHL pro we're talking about him as a prospect.Would you as a GM give up a potential Pettersson for those guys?
At the time, if the value is fair. Obviously not Petterson now. We're not talking about him as a NHL pro we're talking about him as a prospect.
Would you give it up for Lias or Poolparty? or Jost?
They allegedly liked Petterson and Keller . It doesn't mean they were going to tear up the NHL. If we gave decent value, a trade is made.
Good post... these are all my questions as wellI have read a few times that this draft is deep in the sense that all of the first 5-10 picks could be capable of playing in the NHL next year.
How true is this.
Also, I would like to see if the Rangers are able to trade into the top 10 with the extra 1st round pick and some of the assets they have accumulated. Hopefully the TOR/CAR pick is 20-25 range and ours is 15-20 range. You package those two picks plus a prospect, could that get us into the 6-10 range? Is it worth it to do so or stand pat since the draft is pretty deep this year? Take the quantity at the later 1st round picks which could still be great qualityv
Okay but what if a package of both 1sts and a prospect like Robertson is proposed? Or maybe its Buch/Strome and the higher of the 1sts?Trading down in the top-10 is as rare as an accepted offer sheet. The last time that happened was 2007.
Some things only happen on message boards these days
How did we get the #7 pick in 2017? Oh, a trade?Trading down in the top-10 is as rare as an accepted offer sheet. The last time that happened was 2007.
Some things only happen on message boards these days
How did we get the #7 pick in 2017? Oh, a trade?
Dont set parameters that only fit your narrative.