2020/21 Roster Thread IV: A New Hope

Status
Not open for further replies.

Striiker

Former Flyers Fan
Jun 2, 2013
90,265
156,895
Pennsylvania
He is not playing. Not even on the roster.

Giroux-Patrick-Konecny

is the line.

Patrick had a semi-maintenance day.
I love that line. Giroux with two guys who can finish.

In theory, it's great. Hopefully they can make some magic happen because if I'm going to have to watch this disaster then I at least want to see some goals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiggE

Striiker

Former Flyers Fan
Jun 2, 2013
90,265
156,895
Pennsylvania
Thompson and Grant alone were major disasters. Two trades that, alone, were minor. But then their combined impact nuked the bottom six.
Yup. I said it at the time of the trade, we gave up assets to make the roster worse.

And to make matters worse, he ends up being disgustingly overused. This was at the end of regulation of an elimination playoff game.

 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,269
170,729
Armored Train
The Flyers should honestly just nuke their pro scouting staff at this point. A lot of them been here forever under the multiple GM’s & the game has past all of them by given the constant poor additions at the NHL level this franchise makes which pretty much usually always is a similar archetype.

Please and thank you, desperately.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
50,857
22,171
How can a 4th and 5th rd trade be terrible?
And Braun served his purpose.

Grant actually was a solid 3rd line scorer the last two years.
340 forwards who played 1000+ 5x5 minutes the last two years.
Thompson was 271st out of 340 forwards in xGF, 324 in xGFrel, 331 in pp/60.
Grant was 317th in xGF, 322 in xGFrel, but also 218th in pp/60.

Were they good forwards, no, a Pageau cost a 1st and 2nd rd pick, you overpay at the TDL.
They were serviceable bodies, better and more experienced than Andreoff or Twarynski.
 

Appleyard

Registered User
Mar 5, 2010
32,235
42,843
Copenhagen
twitter.com


One of the few analysts who does a great job breaking down systems, tactics etc...

interesting stats.

Flyers are:

2nd in NHL in Controlled Entry Success rate: 62.2%.
5th in NHL in shot generation from the slot on rushes.
12th in NHL in creating odd-man rushes.

Throw that alongside:

3rd in NHL in % of shots that are high danger.
24th in NHL in ExGF/60


And what do we have?

Gooood in the zone. Good at getting in the zone when have a chance. But never there.

Why could that be?
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
56,980
45,378
Thompson and Grant were duds, but the overplaying of them right up till the end of the playoffs was the coach's fault.

His trades have been mostly around the margins for now. The Niskanen trade was great value. Other than that, they've been ok.

I'm curious about his trades when it's time to be bold.

And by curious, I mean scared shitless.

The Hayes acquisition was bold.
 

DancingPanther

Foundational Titan
Jun 19, 2018
33,847
72,094
giphy.gif
 

DancingPanther

Foundational Titan
Jun 19, 2018
33,847
72,094
Pretty good dump succes rate too for dumps...

I guess a lack of relative zone entry attempts is the problem for sure.

Only 20 entries in TWO games from breakouts. What.
Yup. From what I've seen, anyway. Maybe I'm being a little too strict with what a "breakout" is, but I'm not counting the patented almost-two-line-pass a breakout. The ol rim-around-the-boards-and-hope-the-winger-snags-it-and-skates-it-out-on-a-2-on-4 isn't being counted as a breakout either. Basically, any prayer play isn't counted as a breakout, which are most exits
 

Appleyard

Registered User
Mar 5, 2010
32,235
42,843
Copenhagen
twitter.com
Yup. From what I've seen, anyway. Maybe I'm being a little too strict with what a "breakout" is, but I'm not counting the patented almost-two-line-pass a breakout. The ol rim-around-the-boards-and-hope-the-winger-snags-it-and-skates-it-out-on-a-2-on-4 isn't being counted as a breakout either. Basically, any prayer play isn't counted as a breakout, which are most exits

So basically:

The way they are playing it is like the NHL re-introduced the red-line and the two-line pass... but only for the Flyers ahaha.
 

Asnito

Blood Rival to a Briere Simp
Mar 2, 2017
6,965
15,604
Controlled entry % is scary good. Dump recovery is just about league average (shade below actually but yeah). So we do actually kind of want this. The prevalence of each should be flipped. Also, need moar breakouts. Which will lead to more controlled entries
I was being facetious. This team has been a chore to watch since the season was suspended.
 

ajgoal

Almost always never serious
Jun 29, 2015
9,885
28,652
Controlled entry % is scary good. Dump recovery is just about league average (shade below actually but yeah). So we do actually kind of want this. The prevalence of each should be flipped. Also, need moar breakouts. Which will lead to more controlled entries

See, this is what I'm here for. Seriously.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,269
170,729
Armored Train
How can a 4th and 5th rd trade be terrible?
And Braun served his purpose.

Grant actually was a solid 3rd line scorer the last two years.
340 forwards who played 1000+ 5x5 minutes the last two years.
Thompson was 271st out of 340 forwards in xGF, 324 in xGFrel, 331 in pp/60.
Grant was 317th in xGF, 322 in xGFrel, but also 218th in pp/60.

Were they good forwards, no, a Pageau cost a 1st and 2nd rd pick, you overpay at the TDL.
They were serviceable bodies, better and more experienced than Andreoff or Twarynski.

If the trade makes the team drastically worse then it is terrible no matter what gets traded.
 

Striiker

Former Flyers Fan
Jun 2, 2013
90,265
156,895
Pennsylvania


One of the few analysts who does a great job breaking down systems, tactics etc...

interesting stats.

Flyers are:

2nd in NHL in Controlled Entry Success rate: 62.2%.
5th in NHL in shot generation from the slot on rushes.
12th in NHL in creating odd-man rushes.

Throw that alongside:

3rd in NHL in % of shots that are high danger.
24th in NHL in ExGF/60


And what do we have?

Gooood in the zone. Good at getting in the zone when have a chance. But never there.

Why could that be?

An ex-player who understands and uses analytics? That's rare. Especially since he was really poor analytically when he played.
 

renberg

Registered User
Dec 31, 2003
7,226
7,482
Lewes Delaware
forums.hfboards.com
People are expecting too much from Provorov. No, he’s not Lidstrom, Pronger or Hedman. However he is a young guy who is still learning his craft and doing it with little help. He’s been put on the top pair and expected to carry it at his age/experience. That’s almost unfair.
We want too much out of our defensemen. What criticism Provorov is facing is similar to what Desjardins faced when he was here. He’s probably not a Norris winner but he’s damn good for up to 30 minutes a night. I wouldn’t swap him out for Werenski, Jones or any other young d-man in the game. Sit back and enjoy what he is,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad