Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but it feels like you are criticizing the Kings picks as if they are all 'off the board', Lombardi-esque (think Hickey). I mean Blake ain't that creative, he doesn't think out of the box. You think OTT would have taken Stutzle at #2? If the Kings didn't have the #5 pick in 2019, would Turcotte not have gone that high? I look back at draft rankings and he's listed at anywhere from #3 to #10. Hell, Vilardi was ranked #4 and fell to the the Kings at #11! My point is if these guys don't 'hit', is it lack of vision on our organization's part or just bad luck?
I don't think I said any of the Kings picks were off the board, I don't think any of the Kings picks have been off the board, even though I do think in some instances they should have looked for more higher ceiling players. But no, the Kings always taken guys where they were expected to be picked. My biggest issues with the Kings are why they have so many centers at the expense of almost all the other positions and why they went against the trend and didn't have Turcotte go back to school and dominate because it hindered the development of someone the Kings used an insanely valuable pick on. Possibly one of only two top 5 picks the Kings are going to have in this rebuild.
My concerns continue to be how many truly game changing players the Kings have in their system vs. teams that are either contending right now (Colorado etc) and teams that the Kings will have to go through if they want to win another cup. Colorado who is the cup favorite right now and Tampa who won the cup last year have multiple star 1st line players on their team and that is the recipe for success in the NHL now with the emphasis on skill and speed.
Colorado's best players almost all were instant contributors immediately who were stars before they were old enough to buy a fat tire.
MacK was a borderline star in his D+1 at 18
Rantanen came over to North America and dominated the AHL in his D+1, was a 20 goal scorer in the NHL in his D+2 and has been a huge star from 21 on.
Landeskog was a difference maker from the second he stepped into the league at 18/19 in his D+1
Makar did the optimal development route for NCAA players, pretty good as a freshman in D+1, went back to school to dominate and was a mega star as a soph in his D+2 and then immediately joined the Avs for the playoffs that season and has been a huge star in the NHL ever since.
The Avs had five top 10 picks from 2011-2017 and basically had 4 homeruns and 1 fielders choice groundout. And the fielders choice groundout was on a guy who they (wait for it) pulled out of school after his freshman season and never let him truly dominate that level. Atleast they learned their lesson in time to handle Makar right.
For Ottawa as discussed.
Tkachuk steps into the NHL in his D+1 and is immediately a difference making player with his offense plus physicality.
Stutzle comes over from Europe as an 18 year old and immediately steps in and looks the part of a future star. Scoring at an 18G/45P pace while looking electric at times doing it.
Josh Norris, kind of like Turcotte had some challenges as a freshman, Ottawa sent him back to college as a sophomore and he was a much better player. His first year as a pro he was dominant in the AHL at 20 and then follows it up with a 25G/50P pace NHL rookie season at 21.
They also have Chabot who has been a damn good offensive defenseman from age 20 on.
For the Ducks
Zegras dominates the AHL and scores at a 45 point pace over 25 games in the NHL as a 19 year old. Is it fair to say that it's very likely that Zegras is a 60+ point guy next season at 20?
Drysdale was a star in the AHL, I don't think they wanted him in the NHL but he was just to good to not call up. Looked pretty damn impressive playing against NHL players as an 18 year old d-man. I obviously wouldn't trade QB for Drysdale but give them credit, historically there has been a big difference between 2 and 6 many years and they probably found a guy who looks like a similar caliber prospect to the consensus Big 3 from last year.
And there are other examples, usually guys who are star players in the league look like star players very early on. I don't question that the Kings have a lot of future 2nd liners in the system, more than anyone else in the league, but how many blue chip guys do the Kings have outside of QB? This is why I want anything but the status quo with the current Kings team. Either cash in some of these future 2nd line chips to get a true difference maker (and make no mistake, Eichel is a 1st line difference maker) or trade everyone and blow it up to get a few more shots at top 5 picks and hopefully land another true blue chip prospect or two to pair with QB, someone like Bedard or Wright.
I just don't think the Kings have the game-changers to win a SC in the next 6-8 years without bringing in another elite player or two, either from the draft or from trade.