Pre-Game Talk: 2019 UFA "Silly Season" to officially open on July 1st

Status
Not open for further replies.

BigGoalBrad

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
10,735
3,414
Exactly. I can't believe there are people here that want Backes to stay. Same with Kevan Miller. It's insane.

Well the GM has to say it for there to be a chance of a trade.

I also think we have no other option than to tell Backes he will never play another game in Boston and he has to collect his salary in Providence. With how frontloaded the deal was he might retire.

Also sounds like its a given that Moore and Miller are starting the season on LTIR so thats 5.3 mil we can be over to start the year. I just want Mojo inked at the Eberle number and us to add either UFA or a trade. We need depth the top forwards are old but luckily they don't cost much.

The more I think about it the more an SJ trade makes sense. They need players back on small contracts.

You think a guy like Cehlarik wouldn't be of HUGE value to them with their cap crunch? Or Gryz @1.4? Would love to nab a couple of the guys they are losing.
 

BigGoalBrad

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
10,735
3,414
Holy ****! Krejci at 7 or Duchene at 10. If you’d still take Duchene then I don’t know what to tell ya.

Sure but Duchense is the perfect age to give a 7 year contract to you're only risking maybe 1 bad year dude was a #3 overall pick and makes every team Canada and won't cost assets. What did Ottawa give up to get him again!?!? Like Karlsson makes no sense for us unless you want to trade Bergeron for a superstar or something which isn't happening.

2 more years of DK at 7 is ideal. Gonna be a tough call what you do in 2 summers or even next when hes eligible for an extension. Extending Seidenberg a year early and closing the door on Boychuks tenure might have cost us a cup when you look back considering he broke down before teh extension started.

But yeah I'm thrilled to have DK back next year. Hopefully next summer he isn't looking for a raise or term and we just bump him out prematurely by a year or two and don't have to deal with any chatter about his pending free agency and trading him at the deadline etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mainehockey33

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,251
7,872
Maine
Never was a huge Duchene fan but loved his game in the play-offs. Good have been a mirage. Would hate to see Krejci go, but would also rather be a year to soon then a year too late
Duchene was great in the playoffs, but other than that he’s pretty much scored less than Krejci every year, or it’s close. Not sure how his defensive game compares to Krejci but I like DK’s two way game. Signing Duchene to 10M AAV when you already have a guy that gives you that production, is loved in the locker room, and has a good two way game at 3M less makes no sense to me. I’d rather draft and develop Krejci’s replacement because I think we have 5 or so years to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Make-Believe

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,384
45,680
At the Cross
youtu.be
Duchene was great in the playoffs, but other than that he’s pretty much scored less than Krejci every year, or it’s close. Not sure how his defensive game compares to Krejci but I like DK’s two way game. Signing Duchene to 10M AAV when you already have a guy that gives you that production, is loved in the locker room, and has a good two way game at 3M less makes no sense to me. I’d rather draft and develop Krejci’s replacement because I think we have 5 or so years to do it.

I get it. Not saying I would sign MD, but you also have to wonder what Krejci will give you consistently here on out. I'd def stick w him his final two seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mainehockey33

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,311
18,809
Newton, MA.
For those mentioning Ferland, how about Nick Ritchie? Four years younger, scored at over .5ppg this season and seems to be on the outs with the Ducks. I'm not pining for either player, Josh Anderson is the only guy I really would love to have that plays that physical style of game. But if we are going to add someone like that, Ritchie is younger, shouldn't cost much to acquire and is much cheaper salary wise than Ferland. He was a high draft pick and has some untapped skill.

I would hate to see the Bruins overpay Ferland.

You added something to the conversation. Thanks; will check.
 

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,311
18,809
Newton, MA.
Who here actually wants Backes to stay?

Miller doesn't even belong in the same sentence. He's a good defenseman

Yes. When he's healthy. Which is almost never. I have nothing against Kevan, but if he's not on the ice for months at time, he can't help the Bruins.

According to Sweeney, David Backes will not be bought out.
 

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,311
18,809
Newton, MA.
If you actually think that Duchene trade was a simple contract dump you're naive. Also, if Columbus were interested in retaining him then they'd be vocal about it and from what I've read, they seem content to let him walk.

Sorry but Matt Duchene is the antithesis of what a Bruins player is

Okay. Direct me to the dirt.
 

Trap Jesus

Registered User
Feb 13, 2012
28,686
13,458
Nearly $53 million for 7 players on the Sharks for the next 3 seasons minimum. That is one expensive core.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMC

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,311
18,809
Newton, MA.
Why is CBJ in cap hell?

And it's been stated before, sending Backes to Providence saves the Bruins more cap then buying him out. $1,050,000 versus $333,333

My impression was that CBJ has a lot on its plate in terms of paying for their "all in at the deadline" move. "Cap hell" was the wrong phrase; sorry about that.

So, do you believe they would send Backes down? This is a question.
 

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,311
18,809
Newton, MA.
Duchene was great in the playoffs, but other than that he’s pretty much scored less than Krejci every year, or it’s close. Not sure how his defensive game compares to Krejci but I like DK’s two way game. Signing Duchene to 10M AAV when you already have a guy that gives you that production, is loved in the locker room, and has a good two way game at 3M less makes no sense to me. I’d rather draft and develop Krejci’s replacement because I think we have 5 or so years to do it.

Five?
 

SPLBRUIN

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
12,332
12,505
His "lack of defense" just doesn't make any sense to me. Anyone that has watched him consistently knows that's he's actually pretty good defensively. Far better than Krug in his own zone.

I have seen plenty of Karlsson living here in Ottawa, no way he is better then Krug in his own end.
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,533
37,621
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
Thanks for the clarification.

Was it you or all three of the Amigos that spoke highly of Trent Frederick? I assume you would want to keep him?

When we did that podcast just after the draft, none of us hated the pick, but all three of us preferred Alex DeBrincat

As for keeping him, I do know that he was one of the guys the Blues targeted for Schenn and the Bruins wouldn't part with him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Estlin

Over the volcano

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
35,252
20,768
Watertown
Exactly. I can't believe there are people here that want Backes to stay. Same with Kevan Miller. It's insane.
It’s always about the cost - if it costs more to trade Backes than he’d be worth as a player in the system then hells yeah you keep him. KMiller is a valuable defenseman when healthy - what’s the point in giving that away when we’ve seen how important defensive depth is?
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,533
37,621
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
My impression was that CBJ has a lot on its plate in terms of paying for their "all in at the deadline" move. "Cap hell" was the wrong phrase; sorry about that.

So, do you believe they would send Backes down? This is a question.

I know you read Kirk's blog. Stay tuned to that over the next day or so. I'll be contributing my thoughts on Backes and every option available to the Bruins in that piece. (along with all cap ramifications)
 

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,311
18,809
Newton, MA.
I think Krejci can be a productive player for 5 more years.

I'm not so sure but then again I've mostly been wrong about DK's value & production for the B's.

I do think it incumbent upon Sweeney to see what's out there. I'm not certain how much longer the 2011 core can carry the club. I'm also not certain they'll be back to the finals anytime soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Estlin

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,311
18,809
Newton, MA.
I know you read Kirk's blog. Stay tuned to that over the next day or so. I'll be contributing my thoughts on Backes and every option available to the Bruins in that piece. (along with all cap ramifications)

Okay, thanks. See if you can get Mr. Duthie's microphone volume rejiggered for the next Amigos podcast!
 

Tbaybruin

Registered User
Feb 2, 2016
4,211
4,668
If the Bruins deal Krejci and his 71 points because so many Bruins fans on twitter are butt hurt I’ll be disappointed but the silver lining is I’ll be free all of next May to work on my yard
Ha friggin awesome
 
  • Like
Reactions: DKH

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,311
18,809
Newton, MA.
When we did that podcast just after the draft, none of us hated the pick, but all three of us preferred Alex DeBrincat

As for keeping him, I do know that he was one of the guys the Blues targeted for Schenn and the Bruins wouldn't part with him

Wait a minute. I think I'm confusing Frederic with the fellow who was cut in camp/pre-season, the guy with major leadership qualities & sandpaper. Can't find his name on the PRO roster.

This was the guy -- I believe -- you all thought was someone to watch, someone the Bruins might turn to in future. He auditioned for third line C, I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad