so how is that being "complete" as a player? Yes he competes really hard, yes he has a deadly shot, yes he is good defensively, yes he has good hands. But that's it.
I may just be an internet scout but judging from our history, player development, needs and then carefully analyzing each player in the top 10, it only ends up being 4 any way you look at it. Take away the top 2 and you have
Byram, Turcotte, Zegras,
and a distant 4th Cozens.
everyone else down here. <<<< This is trade category
Tomasino isn't all skill either. He is a workhorse with a great attitude and work-ethic. He is great in all 3 zones and even leads the OHL is steals on the forecheck.
I honestly have no idea why he isn't ranked higher. I think a good U18 performance would rise his stock quite a bit.Thanks for posting the video. He looks amazing. I keep hearing on HF how good he is - but why isn't he ranked higher? He'd be a great trade down option.
At this point, the Oilers should trade the pick for the good of the playerHave the Oilers ruined players like Dach, Krebs and Boldy? Why would they be bad picks for the Oilers?
The more I watch/read about Philip Tomasino, the more I want to get him. I suggest you watch the video below.
I love absolutely everything about his game. Blazing speed. Incredible hands. Insane vision. Nice shot. Right-handed.
His numbers are actually really impressive when you look at the context. He is 2nd in EV pts in the CHL, and 1st in EV goals, ahead of Dach, Cozens, and Krebs. This is also while being stuck behind Niagara's offensive starpower. I believe he usually plays on the 3rd line and 2nd PP unit (@Mcnotloilersfan can you confirm?).
View attachment 216901
Tomasino is the perfect example of a "modern NHL" player. Fast, skilled, and hockey IQ in spades. Whoever gets him is going to be very happy in few years. I can't wait to watch him at the U18s.
I hope we trade down for him, and wouldn't even be opposed to getting him at 8.
I keep hearing about this Tomasino as well. Haven't seen any of the draft rankings having him higher than 14 though.Thanks for posting the video. He looks amazing. I keep hearing on HF how good he is - but why isn't he ranked higher? He'd be a great trade down option.
Sentiment round here seems Podk is gonna be a bust and Cozens has no IQ.
Very curious to see what happens in a few
I keep hearing about this Tomasino as well. Haven't seen any of the draft rankings having him higher than 14 though.
Outside of the projected top 8 0f Hughes, Kakko, Byram, Turcotte, Cozens, Dach, Krebs, Zebras, I'd think our team looks at (in no particular order):
Matthew Boldy
Raphael Lavoie
Philip Tomasino
Cole Caufield
Cam York
All would be great picks if we trade down a couple spots.I keep hearing about this Tomasino as well. Haven't seen any of the draft rankings having him higher than 14 though.
Outside of the projected top 8 0f Hughes, Kakko, Byram, Turcotte, Cozens, Dach, Krebs, Zebras, I'd think our team looks at (in no particular order):
Matthew Boldy
Raphael Lavoie
Philip Tomasino
Cole Caufield
Cam York
That's it? That seems like a lot of good qualities to me. It sounds similar to Cozens in a lot of ways who a lot of you guys are also down on interestingly enough.
If Podkolzin dropped to the Oilers, I'd be more than happy to get a 2 way player who competes like crazy, has a great shot and good hands. That's a pretty complete player if you ask me and exactly the type of player the Oilers lack, they already have top end guys with great vision.
Here's an idea for trading down based on statsportconsulting's scale for what value each draft pick is worth in a trade. These trades are contingent upon Columbus not getting into the semi-finals (which...I'm not betting against, but...)
(in parenthesis are the numeric values of each draft position)
Trade 1
To OTT: #8 (629)
To EDM: #19 (364) + #32 (246) = (610) (Maybe OTT adds their 7th rounder (64) to sweeten the pot slightly)
Why Ottawa does this?: they still have another 2nd from FLA, and they need to find some redemption for their horrible situation - they need top end players
Trade 2
To ARI*: #32 (246) + #38 (211) = (457) (*or another team in that range)
To EDM: #14 (456)
So in this scenario, we end up with #14 and #19. I'm no draft expert, but if we could walk away with two of Caufield, Kaliyev, Lavoie, Tomasino, Heinola and York, that would be a fantastic draft for us.
Thoughts? Would that scenario be better than keeping our #8 (Krebs, Zegras, Boldy, etc.) and #38 (not sure who is in that range)...?
Yes the whole league is out to get the poor Oilers.This is ok, but remember that OTT will not offer 32 to move up from 19 to 8 and Arizona will not offer 38 and 32 to move to 14. Teams are looking for deals and they will try to screw over the Oilers by not offering fair value to move up.
I bet the Avs would want Yamamoto+ to move from 4 to 8 when all is should cost is the Oilers second. Same with the Hawks. They would want Nurse to move down from 3 to 8.
Yes the whole league is out to get the poor Oilers.
Or I don't believe in conspiracies. There is no league wide every team is out to hurt the Oilers. That's the dumbest thing I have ever heard.If you do not think so, you are naive.
Or I don't believe in conspiracies. There is no league wide every team is out to hurt the Oilers. That's the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
We've drafted one Russian high in the last decade.Who was the last Russian player that we drafted and did well here?
The Maroon trade. When we traded for Wideman. The Spooner for Gagner trade.Tell me the last time the Oilers were involved in a fair trade ? Or, a trade which favoured the Oilers?
We've drafted one Russian high in the last decade.
Each draft pick is an independent case, personally I believe that Podkolzin's talents and abilities matter much much more than his nationality, but that might just be me
Here's an idea for trading down based on statsportconsulting's scale for what value each draft pick is worth in a trade. These trades are contingent upon Columbus not getting into the semi-finals (which...I'm not betting against, but...)
(in parenthesis are the numeric values of each draft position)
Trade 1
To OTT: #8 (629)
To EDM: #19 (364) + #32 (246) = (610) (Maybe OTT adds their 7th rounder (64) to sweeten the pot slightly)
Why Ottawa does this?: they still have another 2nd from FLA, and they need to find some redemption for their horrible situation - they need top end players
Trade 2
To ARI*: #32 (246) + #38 (211) = (457) (*or another team in that range)
To EDM: #14 (456)
So in this scenario, we end up with #14 and #19. I'm no draft expert, but if we could walk away with two of Caufield, Kaliyev, Lavoie, Tomasino, Heinola and York, that would be a fantastic draft for us.
Thoughts? Would that scenario be better than keeping our #8 (Krebs, Zegras, Boldy, etc.) and #38 (not sure who is in that range)...?
Since there was some Podkolzin talk in this thread now I decided to watch another shift-by-shift on him. This one from the MHL playoffs at the end of March.
I just don't know how a guy without high-end hockey IQ, passing and vision is supposed to be a 1st liner in the NHL. Because that's what I suppose all the scouts project him as, otherwise they wouldn't have him in their top3. For me he is nothing more than a 2nd liner who can be used as a trigger man on the power-play. Maybe a 30-20-50 guy.
Just seeing him play too, he's not a guy that plays well off of his teammates at all. He's on an island out there. He's just not a guy who can play a give-and-go game at a high level. So I have no idea how he is going to transition to the NHL with his rover brand of hockey. He's kind of like Yak in that sense, just all over the place, working hard but not actually accomplishing much.
.