ru4reals
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2007
- 12,107
- 7,724
Brain Burke called him one on sportnet draft and the others agreedI'm not sure why people assume a defenseman who doesn't score goals in bunches is somehow a "bottom-pairing" dman.
And when the kings are still 31st in scoring while hes tearing it up I'll still be shaking my head
Scouts are wrong more often than not.22 pick was awful.But please,go ahead and lecture us ole great one
Had some time to think about it and do some reading up on him. If he turns out to be the second coming of Matty Norstrom, is everyone still going to be upset with the pick?
I'm gonna laugh when he becomes a solid second pairing dman who eats up minutes and can play on the pk. I love revisiting these threads later on.
I think he means Magnus Lindholm
Depends.. Are they the Kings that Norstrom spent most of his time with?Had some time to think about it and do some reading up on him. If he turns out to be the second coming of Matty Norstrom, is everyone still going to be upset with the pick?
The Kings are going to get a good forward at #33
Just look back to ,2016,2017 that argued with us that the Kings were a contender lol Yeah I take those comments with a grain of salt.It’s time to bump the sutter thread again and laugh at all the people who were pissed we hired him!
Or Ryan JohnsonThe Kings are going to get a good forward at #33
And when the kings are still 31st in scoring while hes tearing it up I'll still be shaking my head