2019-20 Kings News/Rumors

Status
Not open for further replies.

kings11

Registered User
Sep 29, 2011
6,311
4,127
Las Vegas
Thanks for the info. Luc and Dean were never a team. Dean and Hextall, and once he arrived Sutter were always talking and bouncing ideas off of each other. Luc was in charge of in game entertainment, etc.

If Blake goes, Robitaille needs to be gone as well.
Back again.... Luc really needs to be let go, it wouldn't surprise me if Hexy becomes GM and Blake replaces Luc... at least I hope so..
 
  • Like
Reactions: funky

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
Actually , that's correct, whatever happened in practice aggravated the tweak.



It's been quite a few years since I've been excited to watch the Flyers, but this year, they are fun to watch. Hexy's hard work is paying off and still a lot of blue chippers on the Farm. Next few years are going to be fun. more so if they unload Giroux and esp. Voracek.

NOt sure how true, but read where Campbell hasnt' been moved yet because the Kings arent' sure if Peterson is ready to be Quick's full time backup. I disagree, I think he's ready and given the teams that need good backups, I'd not hesitate to move Campbell.


Completely agree with the bolded.
 

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
Back again.... Luc really needs to be let go, it wouldn't surprise me if Hexy becomes GM and Blake replaces Luc... at least I hope so..

Meh I am ok with Luc as president if GM is given power to make player movement decisions. I am not ready to say Blake is not working out or that he is. I do not give him the benefit of the doubt because of him buring the kings twice as a player, but if I am honest that does not make him a shit GM. However I really like what Hextall did in Philadelphia. He had a vision and stuck to a path to initiate that vision. I think it is too bad their ownership did not have the patience for Hextall to see it through.

Maybe the kings really like Hextall as well and it is not so much about what Blake has or hasn't done but about a better option out there?
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,528
7,603
Visit site
NOt sure how true, but read where Campbell hasnt' been moved yet because the Kings arent' sure if Peterson is ready to be Quick's full time backup. I disagree, I think he's ready and given the teams that need good backups, I'd not hesitate to move Campbell.

He's 25 years old. He's going to be 26 in Oct. I'm not even sold on him being the goalie of the future. Assuming next year is going to be another crap fest, he'll be 27 when the Kings might have a decent shot at a playoff spot. Quick was 27 when the 2013 playoffs rolled around. That was his 5th year as the #1 guy. Played in 32 playoff games, with a Cup and Conn Smythe. Petersen will be a UFA after the 21-22 season, which is the season after next year.

If he could bring back a better return, I wouldn't hesitate to trade Petersen. Either he or Campbell should already have been gone by now. He's being wasted in the AHL. Cheap goalies are easy to trade, but you're just not going to get a ton. That's usually the case with any goalie though. Just a reality of the market and position.
 

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
He's 25 years old. He's going to be 26 in Oct. I'm not even sold on him being the goalie of the future. Assuming next year is going to be another crap fest, he'll be 27 when the Kings might have a decent shot at a playoff spot. Quick was 27 when the 2013 playoffs rolled around. That was his 5th year as the #1 guy. Played in 32 playoff games, with a Cup and Conn Smythe. Petersen will be a UFA after the 21-22 season, which is the season after next year.

If he could bring back a better return, I wouldn't hesitate to trade Petersen. Either he or Campbell should already have been gone by now. He's being wasted in the AHL. Cheap goalies are easy to trade, but you're just not going to get a ton. That's usually the case with any goalie though. Just a reality of the market and position.

next season presents the perfect opportunity to see what LA has in Petersen though. Team expectations will be low so pressure on him should be low as well
 

kings11

Registered User
Sep 29, 2011
6,311
4,127
Las Vegas
Meh I am ok with Luc as president if GM is given power to make player movement decisions. I am not ready to say Blake is not working out or that he is. I do not give him the benefit of the doubt because of him buring the kings twice as a player, but if I am honest that does not make him a **** GM. However I really like what Hextall did in Philadelphia. He had a vision and stuck to a path to initiate that vision. I think it is too bad their ownership did not have the patience for Hextall to see it through.

Maybe the kings really like Hextall as well and it is not so much about what Blake has or hasn't done but about a better option out there?
Thats the thing, Luc has been the one pushing the contender status... Blake and Co have been really good at drafting and we are about to see some of those kids so i'd keep him... Luc can go sell candies with his cousin in Carpinteria!
 
  • Like
Reactions: funky

Lt Dan

F*** your ice cream!
Sep 13, 2018
12,125
20,620
Bayou La Batre
youtu.be
He's 25 years old. He's going to be 26 in Oct. I'm not even sold on him being the goalie of the future. Assuming next year is going to be another crap fest, he'll be 27 when the Kings might have a decent shot at a playoff spot. Quick was 27 when the 2013 playoffs rolled around. That was his 5th year as the #1 guy. Played in 32 playoff games, with a Cup and Conn Smythe. Petersen will be a UFA after the 21-22 season, which is the season after next year.

If he could bring back a better return, I wouldn't hesitate to trade Petersen. Either he or Campbell should already have been gone by now. He's being wasted in the AHL. Cheap goalies are easy to trade, but you're just not going to get a ton. That's usually the case with any goalie though. Just a reality of the market and position.
this
 

deeshamrock

Registered User
Jul 25, 2011
8,748
2,291
Philadelphia, PA
Meh I am ok with Luc as president if GM is given power to make player movement decisions. I am not ready to say Blake is not working out or that he is. I do not give him the benefit of the doubt because of him buring the kings twice as a player, but if I am honest that does not make him a **** GM. However I really like what Hextall did in Philadelphia. He had a vision and stuck to a path to initiate that vision. I think it is too bad their ownership did not have the patience for Hextall to see it through.

Maybe the kings really like Hextall as well and it is not so much about what Blake has or hasn't done but about a better option out there?

I think given when he took over, Flyers had the worst , barren and bare Farm system in the NHL (and were rated last) and inside of a few years, they rose to be ranked #1 illustrates how smart he is at recognizing talent. Now those some of those seeds are off the farm and thriving in the NHL with more to come. Myers, is 6'4 D who skates well and is pretty smart in all areas, young with room to learn, but went undrafted and Hexy signed him. He's a good eye that way too. Might be why the Kings brought Hexy on board earlier this year

I think Mark Hunter would be a good choice, he was Lamirillo's Ass't at the Leafs and parted ways, didn't get along with Dubas . Paul Fenton is out there too. And by summer there will be a few more.
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,528
7,603
Visit site
I think given when he took over, Flyers had the worst , barren and bare Farm system in the NHL (and were rated last) and inside of a few years, they rose to be ranked #1 illustrates how smart he is at recognizing talent.

Does this also make Blake smart at recognizing talent?
 

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
I think given when he took over, Flyers had the worst , barren and bare Farm system in the NHL (and were rated last) and inside of a few years, they rose to be ranked #1 illustrates how smart he is at recognizing talent. Now those some of those seeds are off the farm and thriving in the NHL with more to come. Myers, is 6'4 D who skates well and is pretty smart in all areas, young with room to learn, but went undrafted and Hexy signed him. He's a good eye that way too. Might be why the Kings brought Hexy on board earlier this year

I think Mark Hunter would be a good choice, he was Lamirillo's Ass't at the Leafs and parted ways, didn't get along with Dubas . Paul Fenton is out there too. And by summer there will be a few more.

I think Hunter is pretty married to his CHL team no?
 

kovacro

Uvijek Vjerni
Nov 20, 2008
9,935
5,415
Hamilton, ON
It's been quite a few years since I've been excited to watch the Flyers, but this year, they are fun to watch. Hexy's hard work is paying off and still a lot of blue chippers on the Farm. Next few years are going to be fun. more so if they unload Giroux and esp. Voracek..

Got to give that scouting staff credit as well. They have done some fine work.
 

crassbonanza

Fire Luc
Sep 28, 2017
3,296
3,194
I think given when he took over, Flyers had the worst , barren and bare Farm system in the NHL (and were rated last) and inside of a few years, they rose to be ranked #1 illustrates how smart he is at recognizing talent.

Replace Flyers with Kings and you could say the exact same thing about Blake. It's kind of interesting in a way.
 

kovacro

Uvijek Vjerni
Nov 20, 2008
9,935
5,415
Hamilton, ON
I think Hunter is pretty married to his CHL team no?

Yes, he and Dale are. They have turned the London Knights into a top notch organization.

Both of them spent time with NHL organizations and chose to go back to London. I really think they are enjoying the mentoring/development of kids and watching them progress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YP44

funky

Build around Byfield, not the vets
Mar 9, 2002
7,078
4,744
If Luc has anything to do with the jersey designs, bark madness, or the TV broadcast hires he should have been fired long ago. If it’s true he is meddling with the GM’s job he needs to be gone. That whole rumored trade with Montreal and Luc’s bff as Agent a couple years back had Luc written all over it. Stay on as a ambassador but get him out of day to day decisions.
 

KINGS17

Smartest in the Room
Apr 6, 2006
32,564
11,711
Meh I am ok with Luc as president if GM is given power to make player movement decisions. I am not ready to say Blake is not working out or that he is. I do not give him the benefit of the doubt because of him buring the kings twice as a player, but if I am honest that does not make him a **** GM. However I really like what Hextall did in Philadelphia. He had a vision and stuck to a path to initiate that vision. I think it is too bad their ownership did not have the patience for Hextall to see it through.

Maybe the kings really like Hextall as well and it is not so much about what Blake has or hasn't done but about a better option out there?
I'm not okay with Robitaille staying on as president if Blake leaves and Hextall takes over. Hextall wouldn't need Robitaille looking over his shoulder.
 

KINGS17

Smartest in the Room
Apr 6, 2006
32,564
11,711
Replace Flyers with Kings and you could say the exact same thing about Blake. It's kind of interesting in a way.
While having a prospect pool that is rated #1 is fine, I prefer waiting to see how a particular prospect pool ranks five years after the first batch from the pool has matured.
 

crassbonanza

Fire Luc
Sep 28, 2017
3,296
3,194
While having a prospect pool that is rated #1 is fine, I prefer waiting to see how a particular prospect pool ranks five years after the first batch from the pool has matured.

I'm not saying anything at all about whether the prospects will pan out, I was just saying that his exact statement about Hextall can be said about Blake. It's pretty funny if you think about it in the context of the discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingsFan7824

KINGS17

Smartest in the Room
Apr 6, 2006
32,564
11,711
I'm not saying anything at all about whether the prospects will pan out, I was just saying that his exact statement about Hextall can be said about Blake. It's pretty funny if you think about it in the context of the discussion.
Yes, my post applies equally to Blake and Hextall.

Assuming Hextall had some input into Dean's drafts we can assume some things:

- Probably pretty good at assessing talent available in the second round and later (Simmonds, Voynov, Clifford and Toffoli)

- Swung on some pitches on the dirt in the first round (Hickey, Teubert, and Forbort)

When Hextall was GM of the Monarchs the AHL team developed some pretty good NHLers for the Kings. I think the development personnel need to be refreshed, because it doesn't appear the Kings development system is producing much these days.
 

crassbonanza

Fire Luc
Sep 28, 2017
3,296
3,194
I think the development personnel need to be refreshed, because it doesn't appear the Kings development system is producing much these days.

While I totally agree that the development system can use an overhaul, the larger issue in my mind is the dearth of good prospects. I doubt the best development system in the league would have pulled much out of the Kings system. From 2011-2016 the Kings had two 1st round draft picks, which were 29th and 30th; The Kings didn't have a 1st round draft pick between Kempe and Vilardi; Prior to Vilardi the last pick higher than 29th was Forbort, etc.

It's really hard to pull high impact players out of the later rounds in drafts. Which is why those 1st round picks are so important.
 

KingsofLA

Registered User
Jan 21, 2020
197
179
Yes, my post applies eHqually to Blake and Hextall.

Assuming Hextall had some input into Dean's drafts we can assume some things:

- Probably pretty good at assessing talent available in the second round and later (Simmonds, Voynov, Clifford and Toffoli)

- Swung on some pitches on the dirt in the first round (Hickey, Teubert, and Forbort)

When Hextall was GM of the Monarchs the AHL team developed some pretty good NHLers for the Kings. I think the development personnel need to be refreshed, because it doesn't appear the Kings development system is producing much these days.
Hate to say it, but coach Stothers is not that good at developing skill players.
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,528
7,603
Visit site
While having a prospect pool that is rated #1 is fine, I prefer waiting to see how a particular prospect pool ranks five years after the first batch from the pool has matured.

So Blake gets until 2022? Unless he chooses to step down, or gets nudged out, or usurped, or whatever the hell is going on with the Kings anymore.
 

Choralone

Registered User
Oct 16, 2010
5,388
4,397
Burbank, CA
So Blake gets until 2022? Unless he chooses to step down, or gets nudged out, or usurped, or whatever the hell is going on with the Kings anymore.

I mean, if he were solely judged on how his draft picks pan out, yeah, why not? How else could you judge his performance? Obviously, though he's responsible for a lot more than just drafting and developing young players, so if you're eager to see him fired just pay attention to those areas (trades, cap management, hires, etc.) Edit: And the on-ice product, of course (while paying mind to context and circumstances).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad