LeafChief
Matthew Knies Enthusiast
Finland had 6 powerplays but the game was rigged in Canada's favour.
The puck did not cross the line. Period.
Agreed. Lots of sloppy hockey.I thought the polar opposite.
I saw two sloppy teams while Canada capitalized their chances.
Hart:
Last 15 WHL games
1 1/3 pre-tourney game
1 tourney game
.....only 1 game allowing more than 2 goals.
And should have lots of energy left since he didn't see much iceMakar looked good
I thought the polar opposite.
I saw two sloppy teams while Canada capitalized their chances.
Yeah it was a pretty boring gameThis game did not feel like a World Junior game. Seemed like there was no emotion.
Really hoping the next game is different.
lol, is that some kind of universal rule that only losing side should act like posh Englishmen?
Please, theres every chance of taking the high road but most of you came down to @Brun0 's level and started being obnoxious a-holes. Considering the amount of Canadians vs. Finns its bit unfair to ask every Finn to act like a perfect gentleman when you pile up with your shait.
Your "I'm gonna be dillhole because some other guy is a dillhole"-defense is bit weak.
There is literally a thread on the main page started by a Finnish fan stating that the IIHF rigged the game.lol, is that some kind of universal rule that only losing side should act like posh Englishmen?
Please, theres every chance of taking the high road but most of you came down to @Brun0 's level and started being obnoxious a-holes. Considering the amount of Canadians vs. Finns its bit unfair to ask every Finn to act like a perfect gentleman when you pile up with your shait.
Your "I'm gonna be dillhole because some other guy is a dillhole"-defense is bit weak.
let's see that videoVideo says otherwise so I'll have to take that over your opinion.
And honestly, I didn't think he stood on his head or anything but both goals were the result of bad bounces.Hart was good and outplayed Luukkonen 100-0.
Good teams can't have bad games right? None of main guys played on the level they're supposed.This is one of the weaker Canadian teams we've sent in years and they just curb stomped the "Golden Era" Finnish team.
I disagree about Canada being a lot better. Refs made a mistake, but that is life/game, they aren't fair. If not the 1st goal and the penalty, this game could have been a lot different. But we never know. It happens. Lots of games still to play, which is good.
Good game, could've gone either way. Canada scored when they got a chance and had excellent PK. That is why they won.
So the common rule about being the better person won't apply if the other party starts a bad argument?All fans of the losing side have to do is not start it and it wont get going, simple.
There is literally nothing you proved by stating this.There is literally a thread on the main page started by a Finnish fan stating that the IIHF rigged the game.
The 'Golden Era' Finnish team you're referring to had the likes of Laine, Puljujärvi, Aho, Rantanen and Kapanen on it. Really doubt anyone has thought of this team being better than that really deep team.This is one of the weaker Canadian teams we've sent in years and they just curb stomped the "Golden Era" Finnish team.
no matter how controversial it was, a 1-0 lead 5 minutes in shouldn't be enough to make a team quit
But they didn't. Still disagree about Canada being a lot better.Canada should have pumped home like 4 goals in the 3rd period.
But they didn't. Still disagree about Canada being a lot better.