If I'm being honest, I think the 4 2nds might make a bigger impact on this team than whoever we pick at 3.
The talent available moving into the early second is awesome and there are still players with great offensive upside ranked 60+.
How can people crap on Kotkaniemi's skating but want Vilardi?We have the depth already... we got Poehling, Danault, DLR, McCarron, Evans, Ikonen, Vejdemo... you add Vilardi, you don't force a pick. If Kotkaniemi is the top guy then fine, but I think Zadina just makes a whole lot more sense at that point.
They're not on the list.
Vilardi has more of a style that can work without great skating. Kotkaniemi is a guy you hope improves his skating in order to reach his potential.How can people crap on Kotkaniemi's skating but want Vilardi?
Vilardi has more of a style that can work without great skating.
McCarron, Ikonen and Vejdemo are non factors for me. Evans and JDLR are depth pieces. If Vilardi, Poehling and Kotkaniemi were to pan out then Danault can be used to acquire a good winger. Better to have too many good centres than not enough.We have the depth already... we got Poehling, Danault, DLR, McCarron, Evans, Ikonen, Vejdemo... you add Vilardi, you don't force a pick. If Kotkaniemi is the top guy then fine, but I think Zadina just makes a whole lot more sense at that point.
Thats what Dal Colle said.... I've watched him live quite a few times, he even looks slow against Junior players, doesn't seem physically involved, looks uninterested.... Then you look at the score sheet and he has three points lol. Kotkaniemi is physically ingaged, always flying around and involved. I really don't see why Vilardi gets a pass....at all. Maybe Vilardi's not challenged enough in Junior and he's bored, but man... It doesn't look good.Vilardi has more of a style that can work without great skating. Kotkaniemi is a guy you hope improves his skating in order to reach his potential.
I would love if we kept all 4 2nd rounders, but I HIGHLY doubt we keep them all. Just a feeling but I’d bank on us not making all four.
I've seen Vilardi get on his horse when he needs to... but when I look at Vilardi, I see a guy who's got elite size/strength, elite skill, and just always knows where to be.Thats what Dal Colle said.... I've watched him live quite a few times, he even looks slow against Junior players, doesn't seem physically involved, looks uninterested.... Then you look at the score sheet and he has three points lol. Kotkaniemi is physically ingaged, always flying around and involved. I really don't see why Vilardi gets a pass....at all. Maybe Vilardi's not challenged enough in Junior and he's bored, but man... It doesn't look good.
Imagine them picking Beaudin with Alexeyev, Ylonen, Berggren on the board.
I've seen Vilardi get on his horse when he needs to... but when I look at Vilardi, I see a guy who's got elite size/strength, elite skill, and just always knows where to be.
I'm allowed to like different players more lolThat's not much of an elaboration.
For example, I could say JK's translates better because not only does he have that skill and IQ, and sad as it is - is more mobile, but instead of stength he has a higher compete and keeps giving 2nd efforts. Two very translatable attributes in the pros.
But really, your issue is that he's a "reach".
Nevermind that he's actually not amongst scouts anymore, why did you yourself, just few weeks ago, give the Jets as an example of a team that didn't regret " reaching" for a player like Scheifele.
There's no consistency there.
Thats a firstNot a fan of Alexeyev, rather have Beaudin honestly. The rest, I'd go crazy.
Too russian for moiThats a first
Yes, Kotkaniemi is better than ZadinaSo if we managed to trade Pacioretty for Vilardi, would you guys still want Kotkaniemi at 3?
Wheeler has Beaudin at 34 and Alexeyev at 47.Thats a first
Alex is like, 25 times more skilled than Beaudin, though. So on top of being a lot bigger, stronger, mobile, hes also more toolsy and probably just as smart a player. Alexeyev wouldve had better stats had he not injured himself, as shown by his PO production.Wheeler has Beaudin at 34 and Alexeyev at 47.
Button has Beaudin at 20 and Alexeyev at 51.
So definitely not a first.
For me I just don't see his offense being a factor enough and translate well in the NHL. And the time of the big bad defensive d man is over. I'd pick Beaudin before him any day.
Elaborate.
I don't know why you're trying to create a useless debate lol I prefer Beaudin, as do two experts. I'll take their words and my own opinion before yours.Alex is like, 25 times more skilled than Beaudin, though. So on top of being a lot bigger, stronger, mobile, hes also more toolsy and probably just as smart a player. Alexeyev wouldve had better stats had he not injured himself, as shown by his PO production.
Ill take my own and like thirty experts over yours?I don't know why you're trying to create a useless debate lol I prefer Beaudin, as do two experts. I'll take their words and my own opinion before yours.
If I'm being honest, I think the 4 2nds might make a bigger impact on this team than whoever we pick at 3.
The talent available moving into the early second is awesome and there are still players with great offensive upside ranked 60+.