NotProkofievian
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2011
- 25,007
- 25,730
Who was the last guy who united Grant, the HFHab gang, and Trevor Timmons? McCarron?
I wanna say Scherbak. I remember there being some heated discussion about McCarron.
Who was the last guy who united Grant, the HFHab gang, and Trevor Timmons? McCarron?
Scherbak was a bit more like a Beaulieu though in the sense that he was a pleasant surprise to be there. McCarron was a guy who everyone knew was going to be there.I wanna say Scherbak. I remember there being some heated discussion about McCarron.
I wanna say Scherbak. I remember there being some heated discussion about McCarron.
Scherbak was a bit more like a Beaulieu though in the sense that he was a pleasant surprise to be there. McCarron was a guy who everyone knew was going to be there.
So much so that alot here didn't consider him until mid to late 2nd.
Not the end of the world but I can see both Sandin and Alexeyev gone before 35. Same as Dellandrea. Not sure about O'Brien. I think he goes early 2nd and right around where we pick. However, it would be a shame if we don't walk away with at least 1 LD prospect with some upside from our 4-2nd's
After doing draftwired a few times, I realized very quick of the limited options at LD.
Ya I was fine with him round two... was team Mantha in Round 1... then team Burakovsky... then team Zykov...So much so that alot here didn't consider him until mid to late 2nd.
Yea, this is not that deep of a draft for D. But there's some quality ones in the top 50. After that it thins out quite a lot.
Probably Galchenyuk and Scherbak.Who was the last guy who united Grant, the HFHab gang, and Trevor Timmons? McCarron?
McCarron was definitely argued for by certain posters... many of whom trashed Mantha...Probably Galchenyuk and Scherbak.
McCarron was not liked around here just Grant really loved him
I personally hated the McCarron pick. I wanted Hartman.McCarron was definitely argued for by certain posters... many of whom trashed Mantha...
Mantha was very much an option for us. And many here had him as a "no draft"I personally hated the McCarron pick. I wanted Hartman.
I will not talk for other. Mantha was never in consideration because he was obviously going before our selection. I was very high on Mantha.
Who had him as no draft?Mantha was very much an option for us. And many here had him as a "no draft"
McCarron was definitely argued for by certain posters... many of whom trashed Mantha...
A few here... I'm not one to air folks out for bold claims made even if they do the same...Who had him as no draft?
And there was almost no chance for us to get Mantha. Natural goal scorer like him with his size never fall even if they have questionable motor.
A few here... I'm not one to air folks out for bold claims made even if they do the same...
Please don't...I still have a hard time getting my head around the fact that among a sample size of 10 NHL teams one team has Hayton in his top5, which means that theoretically speaking Hayton could actually go top5 in the draft, that would be mind-boggling. Watch MTL trade down to 5 to draft Hayton and additionally pick Ginning with the extra 2nd. You've got your 1C plus an extra asset what more can you ask for?
Barkov was way ahead at the same age, and was an elite prospect for years heading into his draft, while Kotkaniemi is a riser. But it's literally a perfect world scenario.Barkov is one of the best centers in the league, I can't see Kotkaniemi becoming that.