Maybe not Tarasenko, but a Brock Boeser clone would be damn fine.The Tarasenko example is a no world potential for Zadina. He simply does not impact the game the same way. Tarasenko is an absolute bull with playmaking instincts, insane power in his legs and lower body and hands that are top notch.
Unless Zadina gets a body transplant and develops a bunch of skills he doesn't have, they aren't the same player.
Except two teams picking in the top 8 have taken him to dinner so at the very least he's in the consideration for top 8 by NHL teams. And Montreal also took him to dinner so that means he's a 3-8 ranges prospect right now
You and I had pretty similar lists last time around, but it's a bit more varied this time.My top 15 is basically set. From 16 to about 40 is still quite murky for me.
1. Rasmus Dahlin
2. Andrei Svechnikov
3. Jesperi Kotkaniemi
4. Oliver Wahlstrom
5. Filip Zadina
6. Noah Dobson
7. Adam Boqvist
8. Quinn Hughes
9. Ty Smith
10. Joel Farabee
11. Vitaly Kravstov
12. Brady Tkachuk
13. Evan Bouchard
14. Barett Hayton
15. Joe Veleno
While i agree, we must not put too much attention to these dinners. Apparently, the Habs had dinner with other prospects too. Kotkaniemi is really a dark horse this year.
Swap Wahlstrom and Boqvist and bump Bouchard up a few and we have the same. Feels bad to rank Hughes that low and I'm sure its gonna bite me in the ass.My top 15 is basically set. From 16 to about 40 is still quite murky for me.
1. Rasmus Dahlin
2. Andrei Svechnikov
3. Jesperi Kotkaniemi
4. Oliver Wahlstrom
5. Filip Zadina
6. Noah Dobson
7. Adam Boqvist
8. Quinn Hughes
9. Ty Smith
10. Joel Farabee
11. Vitaly Kravstov
12. Brady Tkachuk
13. Evan Bouchard
14. Barett Hayton
15. Joe Veleno
Of course they did, but I'm not gonna have dinner with say Ty Smith because he's not consideration for 3 and I'm not picking in his range.
It really hurt me to rank Boqvist and Smith so low this time but Dobson has really proven himself and has so much room to grow that I think he's the safest bet to be #1 D outside of Dahlin.You and I had pretty similar lists last time around, but it's a bit more varied this time.
1. Dahlin
2. Svechnikov
3. Boqvist
4. Smith
5. Kotkaniemi
6. Zadina
7. Dobson
8. Wahlstrom
9. Tkachuk
10. Hughes
11. Bouchard
12. Kravtsov
13. Farabee
It hurts to rank a few of these guys so low but theres only so many high spots available.Swap Wahlstrom and Boqvist and bump Bouchard up a few and we have the same. Feels bad to rank Hughes that low and I'm sure its gonna bite me in the ass.
Lots of guys to like, none that I feel are absolute #3s tho. It isn't one of those years where you are leaving #3 with an absolute stud. There's Q's for all the top guys.
I love Dobson, his floor is definitely higher than any other defenseman in the draft. I just see a bit more offense in Smith with roughly the same transition game. His defense might be weaker but I think he'd still be used on the PK and in crunch time moments.It really hurt me to rank Boqvist and Smith so low this time but Dobson has really proven himself and has so much room to grow that I think he's the safest bet to be #1 D outside of Dahlin.
Other than that our major difference is Wahlstrom who i have been very high on all year.
I'll chime in:You and I had pretty similar lists last time around, but it's a bit more varied this time.
1. Dahlin
2. Svechnikov
3. Boqvist
4. Smith
5. Kotkaniemi
6. Zadina
7. Dobson
8. Wahlstrom
9. Tkachuk
10. Hughes
11. Bouchard
12. Kravtsov
13. Farabee
I agree and Smith is still among my favourites. I would love to have incorrectly ranked him so low and to see him succeed even more than i think he will.I love Dobson, his floor is definitely higher than any other defenseman in the draft. I just see a bit more offense in Smith with roughly the same transition game. His defense might be weaker but I think he'd still be used on the PK and in crunch time moments.
I think Kaut will still go in the 15-25 range, I haven't seen any reliable sources with connections rank him any lower than 20.Anyone think Martin Kaut might fall a bit ? Seems to be highly skilled and seems to be going anywhere from around 20th-40th. Could slip a bit because of the heart condition even though it's not supposed to have any affect on him?
I have him at 14 as well, which is likely the peak of where he could go. He seems to have slipped under the radar on these boards somehow. Nobody talks about him, which is likely due to the fact that a lot of the conversation drivers aren't overly keen on him.I think Kaut will still go in the 15-25 range, I haven't seen any reliable sources with connections rank him any lower than 20.
Let's just hope he doesn't turn into another Jake Bean... That's someone I was high on previously and he hasn't exactly panned out.I agree and Smith is still among my favourites. I would love to have incorrectly ranked him so low and to see him succeed even more than i think he will.
Aren't they total opposite as prospects though? Isn't Smith more in the Timmins mold? (going off memory and draft profiles here so could be wrong)Let's just hope he doesn't turn into another Jake Bean... That's someone I was high on previously and he hasn't exactly panned out.
Bah, why is it I have this sneaky suspicion you never suffered one day from the blues? You probably never even had one sad thought. The Eternal Optimist.Still remember the startled looks from many Scouts at the 2015 entry Draft, when the Habs took Lukas Vejdemo(LHC) in the 3rd round. European scouting about to pay some big dividends in the Habs future, that's right you heard it here straight goods.
Except two teams picking in the top 8 have taken him to dinner so at the very least he's in the consideration for top 8 by NHL teams. And Montreal also took him to dinner so that means he's a 3-8 ranges prospect right now
Oh no I'm not comparing them in the slightest. Just merely the fact that Smith and Bean are my favourite prospects from the 2018 and 2016 drafts respectively.Aren't they total opposite as prospects though? Isn't Smith more in the Timmins mold? (going off memory and draft profiles here so could be wrong)