Choralone
Registered User
No to Lucic under any circumstances, even if we gave up no assets and he played for free.
And that was Kings management in a nutshell. They also dealt a Hall of Fame defenseman who would go on to win another Norris Trophy for a washed up center that they had no use for in Jimmy Carson, and got rid of productive Corey Millen for a late draft pick.
You'd be hard pressed to find any transactions where the Kings came out on the winning end of the spectrum during that time. Nick Beverley was an utter dumbass, as was Barry Melrose.
One of the worst deals I can remember. Never should've traded him in the first place.
And that was Kings management in a nutshell. They also dealt a Hall of Fame defenseman who would go on to win another Norris Trophy for a washed up center that they had no use for in Jimmy Carson, and got rid of productive Corey Millen for a late draft pick.
You'd be hard pressed to find any transactions where the Kings came out on the winning end of the spectrum during that time. Nick Beverley was an utter dumbass, as was Barry Melrose.
I think his hands are also a huge factor in his regression. He was actually a really underrated play maker and passer while with Boston. With the Kings and now with Edmonton he can't even receive a pass cleanly. He can't skate more than 5 feet with the puck anymore because he's too slow and his hands are awful.
Hate to be the guy who quotes the guy who heard from the guy but my coworker saw Lucic in Hawaii for Toffoli's wedding and they had a good chat and Lucic said he expects to be out of Edmonton come October. He must really not be happy in Edmonton considering he has a full NMC.
Brown was huge during the 2016-17 season. He bulked up a lot and looked like a NFL linebacker. This season he was noticeably slimmer.
And that was Kings management in a nutshell. They also dealt a Hall of Fame defenseman who would go on to win another Norris Trophy for a washed up center that they had no use for in Jimmy Carson, and got rid of productive Corey Millen for a late draft pick.
You'd be hard pressed to find any transactions where the Kings came out on the winning end of the spectrum during that time. Nick Beverley was an utter dumbass, as was Barry Melrose.
only reason I could see is if he really wants out and is an issue in the room
You have to wonder if Lucic regrets signing with the Oilers. What was Lombardi's best offer, 5 mil x 5 or something like that?
I think his hands are also a huge factor in his regression. He was actually a really underrated play maker and passer while with Boston. With the Kings and now with Edmonton he can't even receive a pass cleanly. He can't skate more than 5 feet with the puck anymore because he's too slow and his hands are awful.
Hate to be the guy who quotes the guy who heard from the guy but my coworker saw Lucic in Hawaii for Toffoli's wedding and they had a good chat and Lucic said he expects to be out of Edmonton come October. He must really not be happy in Edmonton considering he has a full NMC.
.
He went 8 year under $5M as a last offer.You have to wonder if Lucic regrets signing with the Oilers. What was Lombardi's best offer, 5 mil x 5 or something like that?
Toffoli and Lucic is such a weird pair
Reminds me of late-stage Mike Richards where every time the puck was on his stick it was a hand grenade.
King Notes
The Kings may be in the hunt for Vancouver forward Pavel Bure, 26, who recently requested a trade after the Canucks signed free agent Mark Messier. Vancouver General Manager Pat Quinn has talked with the Kings about Bure, who is scheduled to make $11 million over the last two years of his contract.
"We've had discussions but it is something that I do not like to comment on," Taylor said. "I anticipate that there may be more [discussions with Quinn]."
Staying on the topic of reacquiring talent, now here is one that worked out well for the Kings.
This blurb at the end of the linked article is interesting. If they somehow ended up getting Bure, do they even bother going after Palffy two years later?
Players were making double digit millions per year back in the 90's. Few examples: Federov made 14.5M in 98-99, Chris Gratton made $10M in 97-98, Joe Sakic made $16M in 97-98, and yes Bure was $10M a year with the Rangers.I believe that $11M that was owed to Bure was over two years, so $5.5M per year for Pavel back then, not $11M per year.
Players were making double digit millions per year back in the 90's. Few examples: Federov made 14.5M in 98-99, Chris Gratton made $10M in 97-98, Joe Sakic made $16M in 97-98, and yes Bure was $10M a year with the Rangers.
I was on a website showing top 5 salaries by year. Before the lockout every salary was over $10M after there was not one. The cap needed to happen to protect owner's from themselves. I know Edmonton and other smaller market clubs would not have been able to survive without the cap. It helps level the playing field for teams trying to get UFAs.They were giving insane signing bonuses then, as Gratton and Sakic and Fedorov became subjects of offer sheets. Lot of holdouts back then as well with the likes of Peca and even Robert Reichel missing entire seasons due to holdouts, as well as Lindros and Khabibulin.
The pre-cap era was pretty crazy, and I certainly don't miss Tim Leiweke crying foul about not being able to compete with other teams when they nickel and dimed pretty much every RFA and UFA that mattered to the Kings.
Staying on the topic of reacquiring talent, now here is one that worked out well for the Kings.
This blurb at the end of the linked article is interesting. If they somehow ended up getting Bure, do they even bother going after Palffy two years later?
It's funny how upset people are at players salaries today when back in the 90's superstars were make much much more. Especially when considering inflation.
I always think of Bobby Holik making 10+ million or whatever it was. Shit was out of hand.Not so much that first season back, although he was ok, but in the next 3 he was really good. Not pre-Pittsburgh Robitaille, but pretty damn good for early to mid 30's Robitaille.
Still enjoy that 97-98 team though. First time back in the playoffs since 93. Finished 5th in the West. Even Tsyplakov was good. Signed Galley, got Robitaille back, got Stumpel a day later. Not to get ahead of ourselves.
People were upset at the salaries back then. It's how the league got the cap. It's upset for different reasons though. Today, if one guy takes up too much space, it potentially hurts the team. Back then, you could spend whatever, but the smaller markets/cheaper owners couldn't keep anyone good for too long.
I always think of Bobby Holik making 10+ million or whatever it was. **** was out of hand.
Holik signed in 2002 as a free agent..I always think of Bobby Holik making 10+ million or whatever it was. **** was out of hand.