Would that be a good thing or a bad thing?
Filppula, Lehtera, Kemppainen. Difficult to imagine slower C trio and Lehtera wouldn't even be 100%.
Obviously there won't be any changes before this tournament ends. We're stuck with Marjamäki for the ride.Who should be the coach? Doug Shedden?
Who should be the coach? Doug Shedden?
Well he is actually really good tournament player. Only thing what they need to do is same as what they did with Kontiola. Play him as a wing like they did with Granlund at Minnesota. He is really good with the puck offensively if you make him as a wing. Everyday i would change him for Jma. Aaltonen. He is just out of control.
Obviously there won't be any changes before this tournament ends. We're stuck with Marjamäki for the ride.
After that, though, well... there are no obvious picks available. There are two options I see.
1. Jukka Jalonen makes a comeback for one season and handles the job part-time, having a double role with Jokerit. After that, they sign Karri Kivi.
2. Liitto pays a pooton of money to Ilves to get Kivi right away.
Who should be the coach? Doug Shedden?
Well he is actually really good tournament player. Only thing what they need to do is same as what they did with Kontiola. Play him as a wing like they did with Granlund at Minnesota. He is really good with the puck offensively if you make him as a wing. Everyday i would change him for Jma. Aaltonen. He is just out of control.
Törmänen should be available, though he'd be a massive departure from recent tradition stylistically, and quite a big gamble in general. I'd guess Tapola could also be persuaded to take the job, though he's not exactly a well-liked character among fans. I don't know if either would take the job just for a year waiting for Kivi to take over tough, so it might end up being a better option to just hold on for another year... Or maybe we should just go with the HFBoards dreamteam of Juhani Tamminen, Raimo Summanen and Lasse Kukkonen behind the bench.
2015 Wolrd Championship at Belarus, he took Finnish team kind of alone to hes shoulders and we need to wake up some hope to this team. He actually can do it. Idk if he can make difference anyway but this team really need someone who is leading this it. He is that kind of guy.
We have to remember that golden years are just about to come. Because we lacked talent for so long time now we can see that youngsters can't do it all by themselves.
Agreed on Aho. He seems a bit gassed and makes poor decisions which I haven't seen before in the regular season. The defence is obviously quite lacking in every area. Lehtonen and Honka the only light in the darkness.
So... I just heard something that's good news... at least to everyone who's not named Tomi Sallinen.
1. Jukka Jalonen makes a comeback for one season and handles the job part-time, having a double role with Jokerit. After that, they sign Karri Kivi.
2. Liitto pays a pooton of money to Ilves to get Kivi right away.
Okay after sleeping night over i have to say that everyone is over reacting. We have to look behind results now. We had no change to win anything in the Wold Cup. All teams there was better in paper without any question.
2014 we went to final against Russia, even that we were already actually out of the tournament before Switzerland saved our *****. There is still change to do that.
Actually reality with Finnish hockey fans is just [MOD]. People really thinks that we are really something close to Kanada or Russia. That is just freaking joke. We had last year actually best players we could have to playing this tournament. It is just unreal to ask them come every year. How many at team Canada or Russia played all tournaments WC, Wold Cup 82nhl games and again this year WC?
Finnish best players need some also some rest, practicing summers and more important get healthy in the Summers. I can´t blame Marjamaki for that. [MOD]
Just freaking check out time to time how tired Aho is... he should be taking vacation and training. He is in that age.
I´m done
Swede coming in peace, Finnish hockey is so polarizing, either you play for regulation or you are in the finals. I rather have a couple of golds and some ********* tournaments, than i Swedens case, always rock the group stage and then have a "honorable exit" against fin/rus/can/us. We have the worst head coaches in forever, Grönborg and Marts combined have had their hands on the best crop of young talents and players for a decade, and yet we have won only one gold in that time, which was home venue and against the Swiss in the final. Thats is flat out embarrassing.
I apologise if what i'm about to write will hurt your feelings,
but.....what ever.
1) Over reacting ?!? **** ***
2) World Cup ?!? - at last world cup we came 2nd,
relatively speaking, we had better roster 2016 what we had
2004,so we should of at least do the same, no matter
what of the different tournament systems. Team Europe
went to finals 2016 with weaker roster than of the two.
It was not about the roster on paper,nothing wrong with
our roster vs others,was all about coaching (system,tactics)
and those horrendous line up combinations
3) 2014? .... you kidding right? did you even watched those
worlds? oh btw. who gives a flying ****,the talk is about
2017 worlds
[MOD]
That's because it's not a done deal yet. But I know if said player ends up not coming, it's not because he didn't want to.We need sauce . I'm posting this late and still no hints of this in the media.
That's because it's not a done deal yet. But I know if said player ends up not coming, it's not because he didn't want to.
---
Then to other matters. I know last game deflated me a bit, but I still think we should stay positive. Nothing's lost yet.
A hypothetical question, which one would you prefer?
A. The current situation, with a lame regulation win from Belarus, a shock humiliation from France and an embarrassing OT loss to Czechia...
B. Two OT wins from Belarus and France, and a regulation loss to Czechia?
In the latter scenario, we would have at least won the two we were expected to win, and lost to the team it's "allowed" to lose. While we'd still be gritting our teeth to only barely get bast the weaker sisters, I bet most of us wouldn't be fuming like this.
However, what would be the difference in the standings? Yep, that's right - none. We'd still have four points.
However, in scenario B we wouldn't have all of our heavy NHL hitters in the same line as they should be, Pulju would still be the 13th forward, and the management would be dragging their toes about making any changes, because they'd be believing that things will improve any moment now.
Instead, now we have the fixes we wanted in place, and I bet the management is far more sensitive to any problem spots there still may be left. Marjamäki did some adjustments to our offense after the France game, and now the game versus the Czechs made it clear our defence may need some reorganizing as well. So in that sense, I rather have Jaakola gifting the Czechs an equalizer here than him doing it two weeks later in the waning minutes of the QF.
Another positive we should take from the France humiliation is that it's almost guaranteed they won't go to any of the upcoming games poorly motivated and with rotsis open, and like that make it even more difficult for us and themselves.