Vimpelin Voima
Registered User
Just think about it. Pulju can have U18, U20 and WC gold inside a span of one year. Then Olympic... oh right
The U20 win was more than a year ago.Just think about it. Pulju can have U18, U20 and WC gold inside a span of one year.
I wouldn't mind it if they had him too, but if they don't, well... let's be frank. A player who doesn't yet have much more than an OHL pedigree is not usually someone who should be brought up as a serious WHC candidate.No Juolevi then? Would've been nice to see him instead of some wood hands defensive defenseman.
I wouldn't mind it if they had him too, but if they don't, well... let's be frank. A player who doesn't yet have much more than an OHL pedigree is not usually someone who should be brought up as a serious WHC candidate.
Read again last question. I think best players from outside of NHL are Hartikainen,Koskinen, Kontiola, Lepistö and Aaltonen. Best players on the team from outside of NHL are maybe Aaltonen, Kemppainen, Hietanen, Pihlström and Palola...maybe.
Pulju officially loaned but can be re-called at any time during tournament.
The best Finns outside NHL are Kukkonen, Pyörälä, JMAaltonen, Kemppainen and Pesosen Janne
Juha-Matti Aaltonen of this season? Never. Törmänen didn't even let him play in the last playoff game of HIFK and he had something like +20 game no goal streak before that. It was written all over Urheilulehti and other media how he is one of the main reasons for HIFK's problems.
Good thing we have Miro Aaltonen on this team instead!
I'd say all the goalie additions are mutually exclusive, including Korpisalo. We'll get one and then most likely have Säteri as the backup.Now hoping for Armia, Koivu, Lehkonen (or Raanta), Korpisalo, Nutivaara, Markus H.
What do guys think about Koivu? Think he might show up? I think Minni probably wins tonight but there is no way they will come back from a 3-0 deficit.
I know Granny and Haula have contract issues, but maybe Koivu shows up as he doesn't have too many opportunities anymore. Given that he is healthy.
If there's room for only one in the lineup, I'd have Palola.Who do you guys find better Palola or Haapala?
To comment to your lineup, Pillu is miles ahead of both Osala and Anttila.
If there's room for only one in the lineup, I'd have Palola.
For me, it's no more complicated than that right now Palola seems to be doing somewhat better with the NT than Haapala seems to be doing with Tappara. Different environments, so it's not directly comparable, but still. Also, they aren't players cut of the exact same cloth, and this team has a more urgent need for Palola's assets than Haapala's. And I say this accounting the arrival of Puljujärvi.Same. Based on old history as I haven't really watched Tappara's playoffs much this year. Also the experience factor. We already have young team and Palola has more experience over Haapala.
whats up with the hype regarding Pyörälä? almost everyone have him on the team. surely, there most be better players than him?
whats up with the hype regarding Pyörälä? almost everyone have him on the team. surely, there most be better players than him?
Because Pyörälä has made better points than this season(55p/60 games) last time on A-juniors on season 2000-2001(56p/40 games). Second best Liiga-season by scoring is 2006-2007(45p/56 games). And additionally that his scoring is its peak now he is very good two-way player and was on the team on 2011 and have played well also on other WC tournaments.whats up with the hype regarding Pyörälä? almost everyone have him on the team. surely, there most be better players than him?