haohmaru
boomshakalaka
The statement from Staal you quoted directly contradicts you.
How so?
The statement from Staal you quoted directly contradicts you.
Staal, at that moment, was not better than Stepan or Brassard. Should AV have played an inferior player over those two?
Based on his play in Carolina? Honestly, I don't know what the answer is. Actually, yes I do. They never should've traded for him in the first place but, since they did, they should've had a better plan than "well, he's not going to take Stepan or Brassard's job, and he's not really a 3C, so let's stick him on the wing"
Is AV part of the blame for that? I'd have to assume so since I assume he has input into trade acquisitions and, of course, lineups. I'm not saying it's ALL on AV. It's not. But he is certainly a part of that whole failure - as is Staal himself.
How so?
“I wasn’t taking the spots of the players who were having better seasons” and “It’s my fault I didn’t find a way to contribute” are directly in opposition to “the coach mis-used me” when the coach didn’t put him ahead of the players who were having better seasons because he wasn’t finding a way to contribute.
What you put in quotes is your interpretation of what he was trying to say which doesn't line up with my interpretation of it.
My interpretation of what he said is that his understanding of the trade is that he wasn't going to take somebody's job for the last 15 games of the season and they were going to find other ways for him to contribute to the team - which lines up precisely with what I was saying. They had no idea where to put him, didn't want to shake things up with the top 2, or 3 guys playing center in front of him, and really didn't have a plan that worked at all. That's on Gorton, AV, and even Staal.
We can interpret that differently and agree to disagree.
Considering how bad this team is, I find it surprising that the organization can't find meaningful NHL minutes for Andersson at this point in time.
No, what’s happening here is that you are spinning his words to fit your pre-conception and I’m taking his words at face value.
No, you're spinning it too. Just agree to disagree and let's be done with it. I'm not going to agree with your "face value" interpretation because I don't believe it to be correct. Look at his possession numbers in Carolina before the trade, his uncharacteristically low shooting % the entire year and high danger shot attempts and then explain why he was a 3rd line winger on the Rangers. If that's the only spot they had for him, then they were stupid to trade for him - and that's on Gorton, AV, & Co.
WELL THAT'S IT BOYS CLOSE UP SHOP THE DEBATE IS OVER ANDERSSON IS BETTER
![]()
Sure, but that's human nature. We tend to focus on the bad things and ignore the good, in my opinion because people expect positives to happen regardless of what else is going on. This goes for anything in life.
You mean it’s all on Gorton.
And it doesn’t matter what role they put him in when he didn’t do well in that role. Perhaps, just perhaps, he would’ve gotten better opportunities if he had performed in the role they put him in. There was a little stretch where he had some chemistry with some players, but it didn’t last and he didn’t contribute with anything else. How do I know he didn’t contribute in the role? Well, if I weren’t confident in what I was watching at the time, he said so himself.
He said “it was up to me to find a way to fit in and contribute in other ways... and I didn’t feel like I did enough”
Saying what he said is what he said is not spinning.
But sure, let’s agree to disagree...![]()
AV had no input whatsoever? Sure.
Role doesn't matter? A guy that played 1C his entire career is now a 3rd line wing? Come on.
Of course role matters. Of course who he plays with matters. Of course I've said it's also on him. He said so himself.
Ah, but you did spin. Your quote wasn't what he actually said, it's what you thought he meant.
Yeah, let's agree to disagree without rolling our eyes. Thanks.
The only thing that truly gets on my nerves about Andersson is the insane amount of insecurity there is regarding Mittelstadt. People feel the need to constantly disprove Mittelstadt as some way to validate Andersson. It's annoying.Let’s be honest though, can you imagine the volumes written if this was posted about Andersson right now?
Dogs and cats living together. Mass hysteria.
The only thing that truly gets on my nerves about Andersson is the insane amount of insecurity there is regarding Mittelstadt. People feel the need to constantly disprove Mittelstadt as some way to validate Andersson. It's annoying.
But I guess the only thing more annoying than that is complaining about it. So, here I am, my own worst enemy.
Well, that works both ways, right? People feel the need to prove Mittelstadt because they didn't like the Andersson pick too. All sides (including me) are culpable here.
It doesn't matter because everyone is wrong and we should've picked TippettWell, that works both ways, right? People feel the need to prove Mittelstadt because they didn't like the Andersson pick too. All sides (including me) are culpable here.
The only thing that truly gets on my nerves about Andersson is the insane amount of insecurity there is regarding Mittelstadt. People feel the need to constantly disprove Mittelstadt as some way to validate Andersson. It's annoying.
But I guess the only thing more annoying than that is complaining about it. So, here I am, my own worst enemy.
I've just about reached the point where I can't even discuss Andersson anymore. I'll chime in here and there, but it's just beyond tedious at this point.
I like Andersson, I like Mittelstadt. I like Italian food, I like Chinese food. Very different, don't particularly feel the need to elevate one over the other.
Edge, I feel like you're the zen master of the Rangers board.
Sometimes.
Other times I'm just confused and trying to figure out what in the world we're talking about/debating.
You'd be surprised how often it's the latter.
Have you become a doddering old man already?
We should start a pool including every poster from the old boards, to see which one of us breaks first.
My money is on TB, there is no way he's not already shaking his morning newspaper at the neighborhood children and telling them to pull their pants up.
Years of being a parent has done that long before this board could take its swings. =)
One of the cool things about the boards is that it represents a diverse array of cultures, languages, ages, and perspectives.
The challenge is that is can sometimes be difficult to decipher what people are trying to communicate.
I generally try to take that into account before responding.