ASmileyFace
Landeskog Replacement
I just cannot help but think about how hard McDavid would run train on these kids. He'd still be eligible too.
Only suggestion I've seen that makes sense is to move it back 3 months each year. It's already cut off at Sept 15 so move it to July 1, then April 1, etc. there's no way they can just decide one year that no 18 year olds can be drafted and essentially call it an overage draft. I think they should make the goalie draft 19 anyway. And of course the trade off is 19 year olds can go to the AHL.
One thing that sucks about Jost being on the third line is his minutes being cut down in the third it seems. That top line is out there a lot.
Maybe that's just a feeling I'm getting though? Don't have a pretty live updating box score to look at like NHL.tv lol.
I agree and not really sure why. Probably just to ride their top guys.
I feel like despite Jost being the best player in the first period by a fair margin, it didn't seem like they rewarded him for it, or his line. Just kept leaning on that top line.
I still wonder if maybe Jost would have a higher role on that team if he wasn't coming from a College team, and from the BCHL?
Lets just completely ignore context draft rankings, or the number of different management groups there have been in that time.
They haven't went off the board all that much over the years outside of a couple of occasions. I definitely don't really want to defend their drafting strategy, but inept is just false. If you can say anything it's that they have been simply average, and not worked to make that area a strength for the organization. Looking back over the years at where their picks were in the draft, most of their selections make sense for where players were ranked as a consensus.
Simple fact is you don't know if they had any contact with Myers what so ever, and tacking on not signing him as another one of their failures is very narrow minded.
There is lots of other legit arguments to be made without taking on a mantle of mystical ineptitude, so lets stick to things we know instead of sounding like a casual who makes wild assumptions based on little actual knowledge.
I'm not really defending the organization as much as I am tired of peoples wild assumptions being carried out as gospel.
I feel like despite Jost being the best player in the first period by a fair margin, it didn't seem like they rewarded him for it, or his line. Just kept leaning on that top line.
I still wonder if maybe Jost would have a higher role on that team if he wasn't coming from a College team, and from the BCHL?
I feel like Canada's coaching will end up hindering them, no adjustments at all
I agree and not really sure why. Probably just to ride their top guys.
If Jost plays in this next year I think he'll be the captain. I always forget he's one of the younger ones on this team.
Yeah they won, but I got that feeling as well. Luckily for them Barzal put his line on his shoulders after the first.
I kinda just alluded to it but he's 18 and the top guys are 19 is what I think more is. He's a big time HC favorite tho.
Yeah, but as SW said they should have adjusted after the first. Especially with it being a 1-1 game going into the second. They took a risk being stubborn about it.
Inept relative to the rest of the professional organizations in the NHL, and to what it takes to build a competitive team. Those are the standards by which they are measured.
I'm not really sure why you're trying to stick up for their ability to build a quality blueline on this team. There really is no evidence whatsoever to suggest they can do it well enough. They've failed in every single avenue. They haven't got it done through the draft, they haven't got it done through UFA, and they haven't got it done through trade. Has nothing to do with assumptions. The proof is in the pudding.
This same argument you're making about "we don't really know" and "you're making assumptions" is the same argument I've seen for 15 years in defense of this organization. When you have to say that about the same subject of their ability to add good defenseman every single year for 15 years, it gets a little silly to keep saying it.
When you've failed to build a decent blueline for 15 years, the bigger assumption is that they actually did put forth a sufficient effort to give Myers a tryout.
The last line in my post says enough
In general I respect you as a poster, so I'd rather not keep this going.
I've let my frustration get me into too many pissing matches with people lately, so lets just agree to disagree on this.
Fair enough. I don't think what I was saying is a wild assumption to be held as gospel, but I can understand being sensitive to the subject.
Yikes that was a cringe worthy game. If either team played like that against Sweden or USA, they will get their ***** handed to them. Just so many brutal turnovers, Canada seemed to just want it more and got the win.
Jost was an absolute freak, his stick anticipation reminds me so much of Ryan O'Reilly. Sergachev was also very good, didn't get much help from anybody else.
On the other hand, one player who actually got two goals, but I thought was a disaster was Dylan Strome. Very thankful we don't have a player like him, did nothing except get two beautiful feeds from Barzal. Any player could have scored those.
Yeah that was a bit of a dramatic comment, my bad.
And I agree with there being serious flaws with this organization in terms of drafting and development, and most of what you are saying, just not using this specific instance.
There has just been too much hot take hyperbole lately with people making wild assumptions, and it's driving me nuts.
No worries. This place can feel like you walked into a room of people going when a season goes down the drain. I'm actually a bit surprised it's not worse. I think people have gotten used to this team being bad.
Yeah I really felt like Barzal put his line on his shoulders after that first period. NY has a hell of a player there.