Todd1a
Kucherov or prospect
Joe Smith reporting the Lightning are in on Shattenkirk. Not surprising
Omg please let that not be the reason for clearing cap this will be a mistake
Joe Smith reporting the Lightning are in on Shattenkirk. Not surprising
Joe smith saying we are kicking the tires on shattenkirk
He's just guessing. #fingerscrossed
We're reaching out to Shattenkirk. I still think a lefty to play with Stralman would be ideal, but if we went with...
Hedman - Dotchin
Koekkoek - Stralman
Coburn - Shattenkirk
Sustr
...we could flatten the icetime a bit and have a puckmover and a D-first guy on all three pairings. I'm just hoping we don't offer Shattenkirk the moon.
Probably got it from a larger media outlet.
Anyway, who here is going to be attending some development camp stuff? This is probably the time of year when I get most jealous of all you TB dwellers, which is strange, considering... you know, winter.
Doubt Shattenkirk would be happy being on the third pairing or even a second pairing. This is his big payday and I think he wants to be the #1D/Hedman for whatever team bids highest. IMHO, of course.
Are you saying Sergachev and Foote are both better than Koekkoek and Dotchin? I can give you Sergachev as he has all the tools, just needs to match those against NHL speed which he didn't do in his 4 games last year. Foote has a ways to go, his skating is not nearly good enough. His lateral movement needs work as well as his first step, it's probably similar to Dotchin but not close to Koekkoek. Koekkoek has a better shot, first pass and instincts. His Calder cup run was great, if he can bring that play to the NHL next year there's no way he's not in the lineup every night.
That's what I mean about flattening the icetime, which Cooper has been known to do when he has the tools (or when he's ****ing with Hedman). In that set-up, the second and third pairings are interchangeable.
I'd rather not play Shattenkirk with Hedman. Feels like Hedman would fall into a babysitting role, if only a little bit, and a little bit is too much. When he plays with Dotchin, he can play his A game. Or at least that's how he played last year with Dotchin. I want a full year of two-way Hedmonster. We're a hard team to beat when he takes over games.
If one of Shattenkirk's demands is top pair billing, he's probably a bad fit with Coop anyway.
ya you want hedman with the shutdown dotchin shatty with stralman if stral will stay at home if got shattenkirk which i personally think would be a mistake at this point
i just think its time to give the kids just like weve done on offense their shot stand up prove it
if they dont we can do a trade later in year. Is no ufa's im jumping up and down for joy on lol
wouldnt mind trade for right piece of course just not happy with ufa's or thinking shattenkirk is the solution after watching him in ny
ya you want hedman with the shutdown dotchin shatty with stralman if stral will stay at home if got shattenkirk which i personally think would be a mistake at this point
i just think its time to give the kids just like weve done on offense their shot stand up prove it
if they dont we can do a trade later in year. Is no ufa's im jumping up and down for joy on lol
wouldnt mind trade for right piece of course just not happy with ufa's or thinking shattenkirk is the solution after watching him in ny
Since **** and Stråls are both righties, I doubt Coop would put them together.
Think if we got **** that would knock Dotchin down, possibly to third. Not sure what would happen then if Foote ends up being ready for the NHL.
I actually think Shattenkirk would be ok on Hedmans right.
I actually think Shattenkirk would be ok on Hedmans right.
Saying Hedman will have to babysit Shattenkirk is a bit hyperbolic.
He's not a bad defender. That's rediculous. It's just not the strongest part of his game. His offensive acumen is just way better.
ya you want hedman with the shutdown dotchin shatty with stralman if stral will stay at home if got shattenkirk which i personally think would be a mistake at this point
i just think its time to give the kids just like weve done on offense their shot stand up prove it
if they dont we can do a trade later in year. Is no ufa's im jumping up and down for joy on lol
wouldnt mind trade for right piece of course just not happy with ufa's or thinking shattenkirk is the solution after watching him in ny
There's no way Foote makes the team this year. Looks like a 21 or 22 year-old rookie, in our organization at least. (This is also why I think it's next to impossible, but not quite impossible, for Serg to make our team next year.) The last teenager we played was Drouin, and Coop seemed to be doing that only because he was forced to. The one before, was... Connolly, maybe? And those were both forwards.
But yeah, Dotchin could end up getting knocked down to third. I hope we don't go that route, just because a player like Stralman vs. lesser competition is a luxury few teams have. Dotchin/Hedman is the thing that allows us that luxury, so I hope we stick with it until it stops working.
What I actually said was, "if only a little bit."
Paired with Hedman, he'd be playing against top line forwards while paired with a partner who needs to rush the puck. I feel like it's kind of wasting him if he's constantly covering for Hedman, and Hedman shouldn't be covering for anyone.
Btw...we can absolutely HATE the term or cash...
but...
Shattenkirk makes our defense better in every way and is exactly what we need in transition and the PP.
Agree for sure he makes us better next season but at what cost ? If you bring in shattenkirk next year does it really make us a legit cup contender right away ?
Agree for sure he makes us better next season but at what cost ? If you bring in shattenkirk next year does it really make us a legit cup contender right away ?