These Are The Days
I need about tree fiddy
Radulov apparently wants 6x7
Let's violently scratch him off our list
Term length is not ideal but I'd jump like a dog and bark if we just paid him $6 million
Radulov apparently wants 6x7
Let's violently scratch him off our list
As some suggested you could ice a 4th line of Erne-Dumont*-Gourde. That's a lot more scoring prowess than something built around Brown, Paquette, Witkowski (lulz) etc. And there might be better but cheap alternatives to Dumont too. I mainly included him because of his ridiculous FO%.Even with Marleau, you know from the get go that the bottom 6 lines are going to kill this team once the tough gets going, there's still and again zero scoring depth. We have three players in the bottom 6, namely Namestnikov, Callahan and Brown who have a combined total of 22 points in 110 playoffs games all together. That's an average of 0.2 point per game. Shattenkirk is a luxury we can't afford at this point.
Potential contract and term aside for a moment in a vacuum I'd take Kovalchuk over Radulov in a heartbeat. Radulov would help with the scoring but Kovalchuk brings the far more complete package. Plays both wings and defense if need be, can anchor a PP and be solid on the PK. He's not just a sniper but can also lead a rush and drive possession.Radulov is better than Kovalchuk (Kovy scares me a bit tbh) and I think he'd put us back into contention, but this 6x7 demand is unreasonable.
Welcome to free agency Stevie
Im with you on preferring Kovalchuk. He's got it all. Whoever gets him gets a lot of firepower. His shot from the left is one of the deadliest I've seen in the time I've watched hockey....and it's not just his wrister or snapshot, but everything off his stick is a laser.As some suggested you could ice a 4th line of Erne-Dumont*-Gourde. That's a lot more scoring prowess than something built around Brown, Paquette, Witkowski (lulz) etc. And there might be better but cheap alternatives to Dumont too. I mainly included him because of his ridiculous FO%.
But in general I agree. The one thing we've learned from our playoff runs and watching other teams it's scoring depth that wins you the Cup. With somebody like Marleau, Kovalchuk or Radulov (one can dream) we might fix our top-6 but beyond that it's all basing on Killorn and Callahan bouncing back, Namestnikov finally figuring it out, Gourde showing his 20 games weren't a one time thing and that he's capable of performing like that over 82 games. Maybe Erne or somebody else from the A has a breakout season but we shouldn't be banking on that alone. Bonino is available, maybe he's a good fit. But at what price?
Potential contract and term aside for a moment in a vacuum I'd take Kovalchuk over Radulov in a heartbeat. Radulov would help with the scoring but Kovalchuk brings the far more complete package. Plays both wings and defense if need be, can anchor a PP and be solid on the PK. He's not just a sniper but can also lead a rush and drive possession.
Interesting question. I mean Radulov is 30 years old so asking for 6-7 years seems legit. Kovalchuk is 34 so length should be shorter. Before last season Kovy averaged around PPG in the KHL:Im with you on preferring Kovalchuk. He's got it all. Whoever gets him gets a lot of firepower. His shot from the left is one of the deadliest I've seen in the time I've watched hockey....and it's not just his wrister or snapshot, but everything off his stick is a laser.
If Radulov is asking for 7m, what do you think he's looking for? 9m?
Seems like Yzerman is looking for a couple of medium size fishes. Should not cost too much. But at least they have the cap to do it.
Interesting question. I mean Radulov is 30 years old so asking for 6-7 years seems legit. Kovalchuk is 34 so length should be shorter. Before last season Kovy averaged around PPG in the KHL:
2013-14: 45GP 16-24-40
2014-15: 54GP 25-30-55
2015-16: 50GP 16-33-49
You'd expect his numbers to slowly go down but last season he had 32-46-78 in just 60 games. So he almost doubled is goals from 2013-14 and 2015-16 and his point total went up significantly while only playing a couple more games compared to the previous three seasons. He'll ask for a lot that's for sure. He'd answer many of the big question marks surrounding our roster right now though (offense, defense, possession, ...leadership?).
Potential contract and term aside for a moment in a vacuum I'd take Kovalchuk over Radulov in a heartbeat. Radulov would help with the scoring but Kovalchuk brings the far more complete package. Plays both wings and defense if need be, can anchor a PP and be solid on the PK. He's not just a sniper but can also lead a rush and drive possession.
I know both of them pretty well and Radulov is more consistent and a better rounded player by a good margin. He's also pretty effective around the net and the dirty areas. Kovalchuk has an extremely impressive set of skills but he's a perimeter player, he's a poor possession man and turns the puck over way too often, especially in the defensive zone. He's also notorious to be an extremely streaky player and at this point his defense has become overrated. He had one terrific year under Deboer as a two-way player but he's never been as committed on the defensive side ever since. Sure when he's on, Kovalchuk is one the best player in the world, but when he's cold, he's a dumpster fire.
Superstars aside, how about Nick Bonino? 29 year old, Cup winner, comes off a $1.9M contract, was 0.30 PPG in the playoffs and averages around 0.45 to 0.55 PPG in the regular season. Not the best at faceoffs though (cracked 50% only once in 8 seasons).
What does it mean for our trade probability if we keep our 1st tomorrow?
I wouldn't mind Bonino and Williams. Both wouldn't get big big contracts. Term might be an issue tho
Could help our bottom 9 depth and add even more playoff experience.
Other than Shattenkirk i don't think Yzerman touches the D. We have to accept thats what we got and prey our forwards can outscore other teams on any given night
I'd say lower which would be pretty obvious. Kind of hoping we package a 1st and something else to land a defenseman. Then go after a forward in FA.
I wouldn't for Hamonic. I've read some underwhelming comments regarding his play this past season. He's cheap and will be for a few more years but he's also a righty. We currently have Stralman, Coburn, Sergachev, Dotchin and Sustr, possibly even Witkowski, capable of playing the right side even if two are lefties. The right side doesn't really seem to be a problem anymore unless the sole purpose is to bring in an offensive defenseman for the PP.I'd do Hamonic for the 14th +. Or maybe Brodin. Dallas is our biggest competition on that front.
**** off Giraffe