JimmyTwoTimes
Registered User
- Apr 13, 2010
- 19,958
- 5,281
We've seen this before...the talk of a high profile player coming to Pitt, scare other teams of the possibility and have them overpay.
Layout change? on HF? what changed?
If you want to spend big on a 2 year 3C rental, he does seem cheaper and better fitted to the role.
If Duchene is coming here then Hagelin will most certainly get traded.
I said he sniped in game 1 of the finals. Do you disagree with the use of that word for that goal?
I think if you feel that one of the ahl guys might be able to cover for sheary, selling high on him might not be the worse idea... even if he keeps up his production his value is probably peaked unless he were to find another gear...
Beat you to it a couple pages ago. One user said Toronto doesn't have much use for him..... Maybe re-acquire!
I think if you feel that one of the ahl guys might be able to cover for sheary, selling high on him might not be the worse idea... even if he keeps up his production his value is probably peaked unless he were to find another gear...
I agree. I'd consider including Jarry or Gustavson if that helps. If I'm JR, I refuse to move a cost controlled potential star winger for a 6 million dollar third center for two years. However, I do appreciate that Duchene would be a dramatic upgrade on Bonino, his speed fits the identity, the faceoff ability is something that is definitely needed. I'd be very interested. But Sprong or Guentzel are off the table entirely. If they can't live with a top four d, a 50 point winger, and a first, then oh well. If they want more, they're trying to milk us for all we're worth, and frankly we shouldn't put up with that crap from Sakic.
According to story in TIOPS, the Pens view Gagner more as a wing who can play center than a center who plays on the wing,
So he plays C?
Wasn't Fehr signed for this year? Maybe should have held onto him. He played better at centre than wing and he's a much better option as a 4th line centre than Rowney.
yes he did, are we talking about 1 goal, or goals in general?
I'd be uncomfortable giving up Maatta, Sheary/Sprong + for Duchene
I think most NHL teams do.
Colborne plays all three positions. Once a week for each, he is among the most inconsistent players in the league today. A massive waste of a lot of talent.
I don't agree with this. Moving Fehr's contract allowed us to get the depth defensemen we needed to win another Cup.
Rowney's play leading up to the deadline is what enabled us to move Fehr out.
They are one and the same, basically. Fehr can snipe better, but Rowney skates better and is more physical. It's a wash.
We can, and should do better than Fehr as 4C imo.
Now, re: Duchene. Love the player. If we have to surrender Maatta to get him, I'm good with that. If we have to throw in Sheary to get him, I am OK with that (though I much prefer moving out Hagelin for cap reasons).
I REALLY hate trading away our first rounder in 2018. This is not moving back 20 spots, people. This would be losing a first in what is anticipated as a very deep, very good draft.
For two years of Duchene? Not a fan.
If the deal expands with Colorado, Im asking for Zadorov not Barrie, especially since its rumored Colorado and Zadorov aren't close on a contract.
We've seen this before...the talk of a high profile player coming to Pitt, scare other teams of the possibility and have them overpay.
But for two more cups?
$4.35 million AAV
**** knows what we will have to pay Justin