Stimpythecat
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2015
- 3,170
- 2,318
Ok, so you just proved my point about 4th line players typically not being skilled enough to score like certain people think they should.
Seriously folks, the league average for fourth line players is right about what Clifford scores yearly.
Ironically For his career Kyle Clifford is just about above the league average.
It's not only about the goals generated (although Kyle Clifford has 2 goals in his last 45 games). You just can't give up that many goals when playing so little, remember in 2014 playoffs the Clifford-Richards-Lewis line nearly cost the Kings the series with Chicago.
During this losing streak Clifford has played 34 minutes and been on the ice for 5 goals against, Mitchell has played 41 minutes and been on the ice for 7 goals against. That just can't happen guys, even if the better players play better you can't overcome a fourth line getting that dominated, especially on home ice.
And I know he is very popular here with many posters and many were excited for his return to the lineup, but it's hard to not come to the conclusion that Kyle Clifford has drastically worsened the Kings fourth line since returning in mid December.
Lets get to the real facts here its not bottom 6 we are discussing its clifford and Andreoff vs brodzinski and Jokinen that who they replaced in the lineup. Since they have been back Andreoff last 8 games (Dec 18th to jan 15) he has 2 points one goal one assist -2 Clifford dec 12 to jan 15th 1 goal - 4As Herby said, it’s the goals scored against when the fourth line or bottom pairing is on the ice. They’re a mess defensively, and it’s not like they generate offense to offset those goals against.
the argument i am trying to go against is since they got back into the lineup Jokinen s production is mostly in the beginning of the year and now he is waived Obviously king's management sees more in andreoff going forward over Jokinen but what do they know about hockeyTime to disagree.Andreoff isn't blowing off the doors on numbers compared to Jokinen
(GP)29 (G)2 (A)2 (P)4 (+/-) -6
Jokinen
(GP)32 (G)1 (A)5 (P)6 (+/-) -3
the argument i am trying to go against is since they got back into the lineup Jokinen s production is mostly in the beginning of the year and now he is waived Obviously king's management sees more in andreoff going forward over Jokinen but what do they know about hockey
= sarcasm if u didn't figure it out Keep up the positive postsI hope you're being sarcastic about Kings management.Kings management decided this roster and Stevens as head coach.It's currently looking as if the Kings season is sinking nearly as quick as the Titanic did.
= sarcasm if u didn't figure it out Keep up the positive posts
And I know he is very popular here with many posters and many were excited for his return to the lineup, but it's hard to not come to the conclusion that Kyle Clifford has drastically worsened the Kings fourth line since returning in mid December.
No worry deader i don't take offense to your posts. However when i use its to mean i am being sarcastic Just tired of reading people blaming Clifford and Andreoff for all the kings problems At least you try to put the blame on not having a top 4 d and 3c not that i agree with that either but its not blaming someone who plays less then 10 mins most nights.Well then I apologize.Used to the overly positive post no matter how the team plays.I was caught off guard thinking you were giving Kings management credit.If this is the case,please accept my apology.
Take a while to recover from a injury . He is also not playing with the two of them either New line mates takes a bit to adjust to i would think.He was playing really well before the injury with I believe Shore and Lewis. Not sure why things have changed since his return.
Gabo/Kopitar/Brown
Pearson/Amadio/Toffoli
Kempe/Iafallo/Lewis
Clifford/Shore/Brodzinski
Alternate Kempe/Gabo if you have to. Shore would stabilize the 4th line immediately. That's what I would try.
It's not only about the goals generated (although Kyle Clifford has 2 goals in his last 45 games). You just can't give up that many goals when playing so little, remember in 2014 playoffs the Clifford-Richards-Lewis line nearly cost the Kings the series with Chicago.
During this losing streak Clifford has played 34 minutes and been on the ice for 5 goals against, Mitchell has played 41 minutes and been on the ice for 7 goals against. That just can't happen guys, even if the better players play better you can't overcome a fourth line getting that dominated, especially on home ice.
And I know he is very popular here with many posters and many were excited for his return to the lineup, but it's hard to not come to the conclusion that Kyle Clifford has drastically worsened the Kings fourth line since returning in mid December.
I feel like every time I check these boards someone's always whining about our 4th line.
It's the top six that ultimately decides whether we win or lose games.
Kopitar | 44 | 18 | 14 | 32 | .727 |
Brown | 44 | 15 | 13 | 28 | .636 |
Gaborik | 22 | 7 | 7 | 14 | .636 |
Toffoli | 44 | 18 | 5 | 23 | .523 |
Doughty | 44 | 7 | 12 | 19 | .432 |
Lewis | 44 | 11 | 7 | 18 | .409 |
Pearson | 44 | 8 | 10 | 18 | .409 |
Kempe | 43 | 13 | 4 | 17 | .395 |
Mitchell | 17 | 2 | 3 | 5 | .294 |
Muzzin | 41 | 3 | 9 | 12 | .293 |
Martinez | 41 | 4 | 5 | 9 | .220 |
Shore | 41 | 3 | 5 | 8 | .195 |
Iafallo | 42 | 2 | 6 | 8 | .190 |
Jokinen | 18 | 1 | 2 | 3 | .167 |
Folin | 29 | 2 | 2 | 4 | .138 |
Forbort | 44 | 1 | 5 | 6 | .136 |
Amadio | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | .125 |
Andreoff | 29 | 2 | 1 | 3 | .103 |
Brodzinski | 22 | 2 | 0 | 2 | .091 |
Clifford | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | .077 |
MacDermid | 34 | 1 | 1 | 2 | .059 |
Gravel | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 |