Phil McKraken
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 4,627
- 1,186
I just realized that ulvvf is the same guy who wrote that "Klingberg is MUCH better than Hedman" on Flashback. He must be related to Klingberg or something.
Hold on right there, OEL is one of the premier D in the league. Klingberg is great and all, but he is not on OELs level. Steen is another premier hockeyplayer, not sure how you think he is overrated. He didnt have his best showing in the olympics but to be fair, not many did. Lots of players contributed (including Steen) and no one was dominating really.
And Klingberg is not? He is even better. OEL has a lot to prove in the national shirt, and even if he has looked better in this games than he did in WHC and olympics so far, it still far away from the same bossy OEL i am use to see in NHL. While Klingberg was dominating like crazy in whc and have had a better year than OEL in NHL. Replacing OEL with Klingberg would be a improvment.
But Steen has never been as good in NHL, not even close to, as he was when the olympics played, but still he just felt like a complementary player there, no difference maker at all. I do not know what people base on that he would be a impact player?
Karlsson was dominating, him and Bäckström was the main reason why we did make it to final. Without them we would not have reach semifinal. The most of the rest including steen felt very medicore.
Lindholm scratched.
Grönborg doing the opposite what i want. Just like wjc so i am not surprised.
Ekholm simply outplayed him against Finland.
Grönborg doing the opposite what i want. Just like wjc so i am not surprised.
Ekholm simply outplayed him against Finland.
But Steen has never been as good in NHL, not even close to, as he was when the olympics played, but still he just felt like a complementary player there, no difference maker at all. I do not know what people base on that he would be a impact player?
Small sample size. In nhl lindholm > ekholm
Agree. Karlsson had better game with lindholm than ekholm.I don't really agree I thought that once Lindholm and Karlsson found their groove it looked much smoother than it ever did with Ekholm. While Ekholm is a good defender I don't think he has the hockey-sense to work as well with Karlsson as Lindholm did towards the end of the game
As i said. Karlsson looked better with lindholm.Last season Ekholm was probably just as good as Lindholm and he pretty much always plays great on the national team.
It's a short tournament, playing well is key and Lindholm didnt play that well when he had the chance to do so.
But Steen has never been as good in NHL, not even close to, as he was when the olympics played, but still he just felt like a complementary player there, no difference maker at all. I do not know what people base on that he would be a impact player?
And grönborg never changes his lines no matter how bad they are.It's been so obvious Bäckström and Forsberg doesn't work. Too late now to try something different before the tournament starts.
Sedins and Loui are doing all our offense right now.
And grönborg never changes his lines no matter how bad they are.
And grönborg never changes his lines no matter how bad they are.
All swedish coaches seem to have this problem honestly. Why don't we start looking elsewhere at some point. Especially on tournies on small ice, we should hire a canadian or american coach.
Yeah...no.
You can't be serious.
Alex Steen is a top-10 LW in the NHL. Excells in every situation. Plays the point on the PP etc. Him going down with an injury was a huge loss for team Sweden.
And btw, OEL is a much better all around defenceman than Klingberg.