JackSlater
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2010
- 19,805
- 15,466
It's not about production, it's about him being the most skilled player Canada has available to them. Yes he is more skilled than Marner or Point or Konecny, by a significant margin. Inconsistent? Yes. Lazy and high-risk too often? Yes. But he has more talent than just about anybody.
First off, of course it's about production. This isn't figure skating - production is the the factor that determines who wins. Either producing offence or negating the production of offence by the opposition is a hockey player's job. Second, it's funny to suggest that he is significantly more skilled than these players. Somewhat flashier? Yes. If he was significantly more skilled than those players then he would be able to outproduce them significantly barring some massive deficiency in some other area of his game.
You're just wrong about that. He wasn't invited to last summer's camp despite producing at the same or higher level than other invited 18 y/o's. The rift wasn't over making the team (he wouldn't have anyway), it was being invited to the summer camps.
What other 96 year forwards were invited to that camp?
Bennett, Dal Colle, Fabbri, Hawryluk, Perlini, Point, Virtanen. Bennett outproduced Ho Sang. Dal Colle outproduced him. Fabbri outproduced him. Point outproduced him. Virtanen is a natural wing, brings a physical presence that Ho Sang lacks and is clearly a better fit for a role on the lower lines. Same thing with Perlini.
Hawryluk is a player that I think Ho Sang has a legitimate case to be invited over, though Hawryluk somewhat mitigates his limited offence with contributions away from the puck from what I've seen. Hawryluk is clearly the kind of player that Hockey Canada prefers in a fourth line, for better or worse. Looks to me like one 18 year old that Ho Sang deserved to be invited over, and even that is debatable. He was a marginal candidate for an invitation, but it was build up (and he reacted) as if it was some huge snub. It wasn't.