Has anyone seen this before? Basically just a random "draft lottery" generator, but it apparently keeps up to date with the standings. A fun waste of time.
http://nhllotterysimulator.com/
The game I'm proposing is everyone click on the "Run the Lottery" button until they get the Sens... gives a good idea of how long the odds are of us getting the McDavid pick.
For the record, I had to click it 27 times before we got the pick.
3rd time for me
change the name to bjugstad then
What's with bjugstad? One year older than Zibanejad, not producing that much better... We drafted Rundblad, built his value until he was considered the best prospect out of the NHL and then traded him for a previous 3rd overall pick, Kyle Turris. What's wrong?
Do you realize that for like 99% of picks, you could say "we could have picked a better player"?. Exceptions being Datsyuk, Alfredsson
Note : What's with the 9th round of the 1994 draft and all those NHL goalies drafted? lol Vokoun, Thomas, Nabokov, Hedberg, Grahame...
The problem is the Sens have decent depth of 2nd tier skill. Having guys like Michalek, Chiasson and Legwand in the bottom 6 means the team actually has three lines of decent skill, which not all teams have. But decent skill is not high end skill.
And there's the rub. Despite rolling three decent skill lines, we are bottom half scoring team, and that's with one of the better offensive d-men in the world trying to do too much to generate chances.
And the problem is our top line and top PP is well below average, and I don't see that changing. There are a few guys on the team that can be complimentary top line players one day, but won't anchor a top line
But it sounds like you might be actually saying the same thing. I agree re the #1 center requirement, (although I didn't see Spezza as the answer - maybe 5 years ago he would have been). In the end, it will always be easier to neutralize a team's top forward if they are a winger, as team's see with Ovechkin, Kessel and many others. Center's go everywhere on the ice, so it is much more difficult to scheme against them. So relying on Ryan to anchor a top line is folly when it comes to the playoffs. Even if he turns into a 40 goal guy in the next year or two, if we don't have another top end center at least as good as Turris, we have no chance of going deep in the post-season.
Add a top line center to that group and Sens are easily top-10 in scoring... They are 17th actually, 0.10 goals per game from the 13th spot, the Red Wings...
They were 11th last year and 4th in 2011-12 (2012-13 doesn't count as Spezza, Karlsson and Michalek were injured)
So going back to the draft, when you get a top 10 pick, I'm all for swinging for the fences on a skilled potential 1st line forward, versus a safer big body that likely tops out as a 2nd liner, and a good chance they'll be a third liner
Totally agree and this draft is good enough that we need to pick up the most skilled forward available, preferably a Center, fingers crossed.
Like I demonstrated in my line-up, add a top-center like Johansen for example and that team becomes dangerous. Or a young Spezza like you said
Obviously there was some hyperbole in what i said. I just mainly mean we severely lack top end skill like Dr.Sense said. He have an abundance of guys who could play bottom 6 and a few who have 2nd line potential but we really lack potential star power in the prospects ranks. Anything can happen and who knows, maybe a Dzingel comes out of no where next season and looks like he could be a star, but it isn't likely. We haven't swung for the fences on a 1st rounder since Karlsson. Maybe Puempel too, but I never considered him to have that certain...je ne sais quoi.
We need to go for a homer in the 1st rounder.
Of course, we need to go for a homerun with the first round pick.
You say "we severely lack top end skill", I say "we severely lack a top-end skilled Center". Turris would actually be a perfect #2 Center on a contender. Zibanejad has a great skillset but doesn't have elite vision and doesn't use his teammates well enough, not a good enough playmaker to be a #1, but even that you never know, players continue to develop. Look at Hoffman, he's a late bloomer and he's looking more and more like a first line forward... I have never been wrong on a player more than for him (except probably Andre Petersson and Peter Regin who have a ton of skill but can't translate it to the NHL). It means we have no idea how players will develop. Maybe Puempel becomes a star, maybe Paul, I dunno but who saw Hoffman coming? Who saw Stone coming? Maybe Stone continues to develop too and becomes a top-line player?
But in summary, like I said, add a top line center and I really like the amount of skill in that group :
Hoffman-Johansen-Ryan
MacArthur-Turris-Stone
Puempel-Zibanejad-Lazar
Prince-Paul-Chiasson
Pageau
Methot-Karlsson
Cowen-Ceci
Wikstrand-Wideman
Wiercioch
Anderson
Lehner