Prospect Info: 2015 NHL Draft - Pick #62 - Robin Kovacs

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Petrov was available when we took Stepan too.

I wasn't a fan of Petrov.

Clearly Rangers didnt like either of them and felt Kovacs would be available 5 picks later. Why not just take the extra pick.

Apparently not, but for all of the skill up front that they lack, Bracco or Kylington would have been a great pick.

I've been ****ting on the Rangers today. But people's self centered responses. My guy was available, we screwed up never get old.

So? You are not a profensional scout. shut the **** up

Didn't know I didn't have freedom of speech like you two do.
 
Apparently, he is 1" taller and 10lbs lighter than Hags. May need to put on weight, but he should project to be at the very worst physically similar to Hags. I am not seeing how he is a smaller version of him.

I don't think Hags is 5'11.
 
I wasn't a fan of Petrov.



Apparently not, but for all of the skill up front that they lack, Bracco or Kylington would have been a great pick.





Didn't know I didn't have freedom of speech like you two do.

Does freedom of speech in your world mean that you have the freedom to not be criticized if someone disagrees? Or do we not have the freedom of speech that you do and we can't take exception with the post?
 
Does freedom of speech in your world mean that you have the freedom to not be criticized if someone disagrees? Or do we not have the freedom of speech that you do and we can't take exception with the post?

No but it wasn't a "condescending" post.

Your posts, including that one are just about always condescending. So don't be a hypocrite.
 
Real good potential, more than Hags ever had. Definitely high risk high reward.

This kid reminds me a bit of a Erik Karlsson at forward lol. Real good confidence and very cocky, and pulls off great plays on a regular basis. Of course not a super talent, but has that potential to come from behind.

Last time I saw him he was a bit of a midget, but that was playing against men.
 
Don't know. Just saying Hags looks like 6'1 to me.

Always possible. Most height stats are inflated a little bit, if at all. That might be a first to have height understated, but nothing is impossible when it comes to internet info.
 
No but it wasn't a "condescending" post.

Your posts, including that one are just about always condescending. So don't be a hypocrite.

I don't know how all of my posts are always condescending. Your post may not have been condescending. It was pretty arrogant. Like it was an objective fact that because your guys weren't taken Sather screwed up.

And that last one was not condescending in any way. You came back at me with a post asking if you had freedom of speech, I said, just as much as I do to disagree.
 
I don't know how all of my posts are always condescending. Your post may not have been condescending. It was pretty arrogant. Like it was an objective fact that because your guys weren't taken Sather screwed up.

And that last one was not condescending in any way. You came back at me with a post asking if you had freedom of speech, I said, just as much as I do to disagree.

What a load of crap. You disagreed and went nuts because I didn't share your opinion. That's hypocritical and condescending.

I'll voice my opinion of the pick it I want to. Don't call me condescending for voicing an opinion when you don't agree with it. Get over yourself.
 
What a load of crap. You disagreed and went nuts because I didn't share your opinion. That's hypocritical and condescending.

I'll voice my opinion of the pick it I want to. Don't call me condescending for voicing an opinion when you don't agree with it. Get over yourself.

I "went nuts". You have a loose definition for nuts. You can voice your opinion but I can't disagree?
 
I "went nuts". You have a loose definition for nuts. You can voice your opinion but I can't disagree?

Yes, you can, but calling my post condescending when it clearly wasn't is an unprovoked attack for god knows what reason you have aside from disagreeing with my opinion.

If you can't see this, I don't know what to say.
 
Yes, you can, but calling my post condescending when it clearly wasn't is an unprovoked attack for god knows what reason you have aside from disagreeing with my opinion.

If you can't see this, I don't know what to say.

Your post wasn't condescending. It was arrogant, two different things. It was a "my prospect didn't make it so, OMG!" I'm done with this conversation, there's no point in arguing about something stupid.
 
I haven't seen this kid much, so I can't really express much of my own opinion.

However, I know several people who are really high on this kid.

From what I've heard, he sounds intriguing.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad