2nd one for me. We already have a similar player like Paajarvi in Kreider, while Burmistrov fills a huge hole at 3C right now. the 13th pick can still pick up a solid player.
Leaning on this too. Draft is pretty good this year.
I'll take the 1st package, if I had to.
Difference between 7 and 13 is Lindholm/Ristolainen/Nichushkin/Monahan instead of Zadorov/Wennberg/Nurse/Gauthier. Burmistrov would be a nice acquisition but I think he's heavily overrated on our forum.
I'll take the 1st package, if I had to.
Difference between 7 and 13 is Lindholm/Ristolainen/Nichushkin/Monahan instead of Zadorov/Wennberg/Nurse/Gauthier. Burmistrov would be a nice acquisition but I think he's heavily overrated on our forum.
When was the last big trade that wasn't made to improve the team? Or are you talking about HF logic?
3 wrongs don't make a right....
Id rather have Pyatt. Which is saying something
Didn't Tootoo have substance abuse issues? Not sure the Rangers would want to go down that path after what happened with Boogaard.
He plays nothing like Prust. Prust is a good defensive player who doesn't stop hustling. Tootoo might have more individual talent, but he is a headcase and very inconsistent player. Which is why he didn't see the ice in the playoffs. He is not very good IMO.
Ryane Clowe has the green light from the doctors after passing a battery of tests after his last concussion.
Does the want for a fighter ever stop? Tootoo is not needed. Rangers already have Dorsett and Asham. People already complain the Rangers don't have a usable 4th line, Tootoo does not improve that.
I would rather have Tootoo who is very good in his role.
Yes. Alcohol I believe.
The Rangers needed to replace Prust's toughness and abrasiveness. Tootoo brings that.
He didn't play in the playoffs because the Wings and Babcock don't like to employ toughness. He was very effective for the Preds in the playoffs.
well if that is true... the Red Wings should have not signed him....
I would rather have Tootoo who is very good in his role.
The Rangers needed to replace Prust's toughness and abrasiveness. Tootoo brings that.
He didn't play in the playoffs because the Wings and Babcock don't like to employ toughness. He was very effective for the Preds in the playoffs.
Tootoo is a far worse producer, worse defensively and way more undisciplined.
I thought they got that with the acquisition of Dorsett? If they wanted more toughness and abrasiveness, they should've held onto Mike Rupp.
Babcock plays his best players. For years, he's put Todd Bertuzzi on the first line with Datsyuk, even in the playoffs.
Tootoo had 8 points in 42 games this season playing ~9 minutes a night.
Pyatt had 11 playing 48 games playing ~13 minutes a night.
He is aggressive, that is true. A player in his role is supposed to be.
Rupp can't skate. HUGE difference, and I'm sure you knew that before posting that.
Bertuzzi, for years, has had legit top-6 talent. He is not just some goon. Tootoo is not Bertuzzi.
Renaud Lavoie just tweeted this in French, I translated it with google.
Pyatt, while soft is a much more dominant board play player, along with a much better defensive game.
There is a difference between being aggressive and just being plain stupid like Tootoo can be (see Miller hit). Prust was an aggressive player, but he never played stupid. Perhaps Prust is truly one of a kind player.
I think they're very comparable players. Only employed because they play like thugs.
Agreed about Bertuzzi, but you can look at my edited part of my last post.
Please no more cokemachines and undisciplined players. Tootoo is a terrible player that brings nothing useful to this team.I completely disagree with the thought of acquiring him. Overpaid, injury prone, bad hockey player.
Complaining about Pyatt but advocating for Tootoo.
This forum makes me scratch my head sometimes.
One sucks at his role. One does not?
Evidence? Aside from the fact that Pyatt has better numbers in both the regular season and playoffs, but obvs that doesn't count.