Guys forget the idea of being buyers. Let me break it down for you.
We have 20 points in 24 games. Even if we played great hockey (and I used the 'Nucks as a point of reference - they average 1.22 points/game). So let's say suddently for the last 24 games we played at that pace - we would end up with 49 points in 48 games.
So we would need the Blues (23 games, 26 points), Coyotes (24 games, 25 points), Preds (24 g, 25 pt) and Wild (23 g, 24 pt) to all play below .500 hockey AND hope that the Flames (22 g, 22 pt), Avs (23 g, 22p) and Oilers (24 g, 21 pt) didn't play well either. Throw in the fact that all of these teams play against each other and it's virtually no chance.
Good news (as someone just mentioned) is that few sellers and lots of buyers means the return on our trades could be real good.
It's up to JD and Jarmo and company to decide who fits long term and who doesn't. maybe with some of the goaltender injuries (lie Carolina) we could get a 4th round pick for Mason? It always amazes me how the price of 3rd line grinding forwards and stay at home d-men are at their highest at the deadline (and we all know we have plenty of 3rd line grinding forwards at least).
Who knows one of the best trades we ever made was season 1 getting Whitney because he was injured. If someone like that is available who could help us out in future years, then by all means go for it, but we're not going to be adding peices to make a futile run at the playoffs this year.