GDT: 2013 NHL DRAFT: 3PM ET to 7PM ET (NBCSN, NHL Network, TSN)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well if you're going to not have a 100% roster turnover, I guess those would be a good 4 to keep.

Maybe we can make some moves in the 2009 draft to plug the holes in the Rangers roster for 2013-14. What do you think?

My point is that draft picks arent garbage. They turn out to be trade chips or parts of your roster.
 
The Doom and Gloom on here is hilarious. Lets make moves just to make moves. And now were supposed to be worried about Bolland/Clutterbuck.....really?
 
The Doom and Gloom on here is hilarious. Lets make moves just to make moves. And now were supposed to be worried about Bolland/Clutterbuck.....really?

"make moves to make moves".

You think our bottom six wasnt garbage? Or our top six good enough?

We could have traded some of the dead weight for picks, stock pile some talent for the system. Saved cap space to improve the bottom six. And then made one slightly larger deal to improve the top six. Del Zotto or Staal.

Thats not "moves to make moves". Thats called being proactive and trying to improve the team now and for the future.

Thats what the draft is about.

A team with major holes shouldnt be complacent.
 
So, I don't think I ever talked about this. But I was going to take over the Atlanta Thrashers writer spot a couple of years back.

I disagreed with the low ranking of Daultan Leveille. Lol. Swing and a miss.
 
"make moves to make moves".

You think our bottom six wasnt garbage? Or our top six good enough?

We could have traded some of the dead weight for picks, stock pile some talent for the system. Saved cap space to improve the bottom six. And then made one slightly larger deal to improve the top six. Del Zotto or Staal.

Thats not "moves to make moves". Thats called being proactive and trying to improve the team now and for the future.

Assumptions. If those trades aren't available you can't make them.
 
"make moves to make moves".

You think our bottom six wasnt garbage? Or our top six good enough?

We could have traded some of the dead weight for picks, stock pile some talent for the system. Saved cap space to improve the bottom six. And then made one slightly larger deal to improve the top six. Del Zotto or Staal.

Thats not "moves to make moves". Thats called being proactive and trying to improve the team now and for the future.

Thats what the draft is about.

A team with major holes shouldnt be complacent.

The season is starting tomorrow? The real fun is about to begin. Absolutely all of that stuff can still happen
 
"make moves to make moves".

You think our bottom six wasnt garbage? Or our top six good enough?

We could have traded some of the dead weight for picks, stock pile some talent for the system. Saved cap space to improve the bottom six. And then made one slightly larger deal to improve the top six. Del Zotto or Staal.

Thats not "moves to make moves". Thats called being proactive and trying to improve the team now and for the future.

Thats what the draft is about.

A team with major holes shouldnt be complacent.


Still time to make moves.....and be competitive just like this franchise has been for the last 70+ years

:laugh:
 
"make moves to make moves".

You think our bottom six wasnt garbage? Or our top six good enough?

We could have traded some of the dead weight for picks, stock pile some talent for the system. Saved cap space to improve the bottom six. And then made one slightly larger deal to improve the top six. Del Zotto or Staal.

Thats not "moves to make moves". Thats called being proactive and trying to improve the team now and for the future.

Thats what the draft is about.

A team with major holes shouldnt be complacent.

No, that is called assuming the league is based around the rangers and excluding the fact that you can't make a trade without other team agreeing to it - without a different team making a better offer etc..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad