Anyone can post a list of draft picks to support whatever view point they want (whether it's pick 10 being not really that much better than pick 30 or vice versa). Obviously draft picks aren't going to always hit at the top or always be wasted at the bottom, it's an inexact science.
Thing is when you don't know what's going to be available to you or how the player's career pans out beforehand, a #10-15 pick should eventually have infinitely more value than a #29 pick in theory. In practice it may not work out that way but that doesn't mean GM's should go trading their firsts two years down the road for a pick at the back end of a first round in a weak draft this year.
Why? All you have to do is look at prior drafts and selections to see for yourself. There is no reason why pick 10 has infinitely more value than pick 20 when you see the selections. Slightly more valuable? Sure. Infinitely? That's like a top 3 pick compared to a 5th round pick.
That is a big assumption. What if 2014 is a VERY weak draft? What if 2012 was a VERY strong draft.
Lou made the right decision at the time to take the pick now and wait until 2014 to forfeit the pick.
Yeah, I'll trust my eyes and just look at the players myself. I'm sure that's interesting but you lost me at the scatter plot. They also do not take production into account whatsoever, only games played. It doesn't account for the actual quality of the NHL player. A third line player who has a long career would have the same value as Steven Stamkos under that analysis.
Again, why I said IN THEORY. Plus when you're talking about a difference between 9 and 29, there's also all the 'other' guys that go in between 9-29, that doesn't get factored into anyone's list. Maybe the Devils draft someone that gets taken a few picks later that does have a successful NHL career. It's not just about comparing picks other teams make. That's far fewer choices for your team to have, and you have far less of a chance of finding an NHL player from 29 on than from 9-28.
Last year was supposed to be a bad draft.
You need like 10 years after a draft to figure out if the class was weak or strong.
It's worth more in the short term but not in the long run.
Do you really think Lou is thinking about the long term right now? The guy will probably likely be retired in 5 years. Marty will be gone.
This is just Neidermayer all over again, except this time it's Parise.
Did you read the paper? They use game play because they are comparing F, D, and goalies.
You can find bust at every draft pick, but the chances of player not being an NHL player increases every pick.
Lets hope the Sal and Zajac contracts don't turn into the harken back to the MMM disaster.
Do you really think Lou is thinking about the long term right now? The guy will probably likely be retired in 5 years. Marty will be gone. These guys are trying to win now. Also, human nature is to proctrastinate, especially on things that are negative. Things change over time; that 1st rounder that we are giving up might be recouped through a trade, who knows. Then on top of that, there's really not that much oof a difference between 10-16 pick and a 17-30 pick. It's really not as simple a decision as many make it out to be.
Agreed that you don't know that beforehand, but beforehand was when we had to make our choice on giving up the pick or not. Giving up almost the worst pick possible in a supposedly mediocre-poor draft should have been a no-brainer but it wasn't.
holy hell are 2006-2007 BAD
i liked halischuk, flipping him for oldarnott was a headscratcher then and it looks even worse now.
You are not understanding..... On 2014 draft day - Matteau is going to be worth more than the 15th picked. Low 1st round picks are not nearly as valuable as you think they are.
That is a big assumption. What if 2014 is a VERY weak draft? What if 2012 was a VERY strong draft.
Lou made the right decision at the time to take the pick now and wait until 2014 to forfeit the pick.
Drafts since 2003
2003
1st-Parise
2nd-Petr Vrana
3rd-Ivan Khomutov
5th-Zach Tarkir
6th-Jason Smith
8th-Joey Tenute
9th-Arseny BOndarev
2004
1st-Travis Zajac
5th-Alexander MIkhailishin
6th- Josh Disher
7th- PL3, Tyler Eckford
2005
1st-Bergfors
2nd-Frazee
3rd-Mark Fraser
4th-Patrick Davis
5th-Mark Fayne
6th-Sean Zimmerman
7th-Alex Sundstrom
2006
1st-Matt Corrente
2nd-Alex Vasyunov
3rd-Kirill Tulupov, Vladimir Zharkov
4th-Tyler Miller
5th- OLiver Magnan
6th-Tony Romano
7th-Kyell Henegan
2007
2nd- Mike Hoeffel
3rd-Nick Palmieri/Corbin McPhearson
4th-Matt Halischuk
6th- Vili Sopanen
7th-Ryan Molle
2008
1st-Mattias Tedenby
2nd-Brandon Burlon, Patrice Cormier
3rd-Adam Henrique
4th-Matt Delahey
5th-Kory Nagy
6th-David Wohleberg
7th-Harry Young
2009
1st-Jacob Josefson
2nd-Eric Gelinas
3rd-Alex Urbom
4th-Seth Helgeson
5th-Derek Rodwell
6th-Ashton Bernard
7th-Curtis Gedig
2010-2012 is too hard to tell
What the **** happened to our drafting 2003-2007? Since then has been eh but not as bad
And that is EXACTLY why he kept the pick and picked short-term gain over long-term sense. And why he's keeping eight defensemen around even though it's ****ing around with Larsson/Fayne/etc big-time.
Lou better do some damn good work in the UFA market this year if we want the pick next year to be any better than a top 5 pick. That means retaining Elias and Clarkson on reasonable contracts (Clarkson should not be making more than 4~ mil) and aggressively pursuing scoring FA's like Ryder, Horton or Macarthur.
Ugh. You call those players goal scorers? Save your cap space.