That wouldn't be a horrible return. At first glance I like it, though admittedly I am not all that familiar with either prospect.
http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/tyler_pitlick/
http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/mitchell_moroz/
i agree take the picks. not to mention i think Deano is up against the limit of 50 players on contract. they like to operate around 47 or so iirc. relief on the cap front and contract situation as well
Trading Clifford for picks just sounds awful.
The cap is the ******* son of a motherless goat
and by ******* I mean *******, not *******
Trading Clifford for futures is about the only option unless we are talking about a bigger package deal.
Some twitter chatter of a rumour of a done deal between the Kings and Oilers of Kyle Clifford for Pitlick/Moroz
The deal has yet to be officially announced, and some are suggesting Kings people are the ones spreading the rumor in hopes that teams will hear it and offer greater counter-offers. Quite possible this is the case.
Oiler fan here.
Cloutier is not a reliable source at all. Not sure Moroz/Pitlick is much of a return for you guys though. Neither player is that great.
Lander would be a much better idea, or go for draft picks perhaps. Doubt either of the other guys crack the NHL in their career.
Listen, the guy writes "I read one site that suggests the return could be prospects Tyler Pitlick + Mitchell Moroz."
Does that sound like he's getting some inside information? He read it on a god damn website
Here, the Kings are gonna get Taylor Hall for Clifford and a 3rd rounder, tell your friends you read it on a website because you just did
Do you agree that Richard Cloutier is the Dan Cloutier of reporters?