Matt4776
Registered User
- May 8, 2009
- 2,896
- 690
Yeah, I don't either. In any event, keep up the updates, Matt! Hopefully you're reporting on a dramatic bounce-back next year...
Your mouth to god's ears. For both Boo and Michigan.
Yeah, I don't either. In any event, keep up the updates, Matt! Hopefully you're reporting on a dramatic bounce-back next year...
Who do you guys see being a bigger impact player ... Skjei or McIlrath?
I think Skjei is pretty much universally seen as the better prospect at this point. There is a non-zero chance he develops into a McDonagh clone.
Does Duclair have any shot at wowing enough in training camp to at least get an early season look? I'm assuming he's not physically mature enough to play against men.
For the record, I watched Skjei play in four or five games last year and thought he got noticeably (and dramatically) better as the year progressed. I think he would have a legitimate shot to make the big club out of camp if he chose to leave school and there were a spot available on the left side. It would be an interesting battle between him and Allen for sure.
Who do you guys see being a bigger impact player ... Skjei or McIlrath?
Does Duclair have any shot at wowing enough in training camp to at least get an early season look? I'm assuming he's not physically mature enough to play against men.
Does Duclair have any shot at wowing enough in training camp to at least get an early season look? I'm assuming he's not physically mature enough to play against men.
He's 5' 11" 1/2 and 184 lbs, about the same stats as Callahan. His size wouldn't hold him back from playing in the NHL.
I think he could get a cup of coffee but I don't expect him to make the team out of camp.
No, MCI fillls the most important need. If he is clearing men in front of Hank, we will give up no goals the whole year. If Hank sees 'em, he stops 'em.
sad to say, i dont know that any of our forward prospects are sure things to be difference makers for NYR.
Define "difference maker". I think plenty of them have shots at being good NHLers and a couple could develop into first liners.
None have consistently shown the upside potential of Kreider or Hagelin
Give guys a little time to develop. Hagelin is 25 and hasn't broken 40 points. And did you see Kreider in HFD as recently as last season?
I expect Lindberg is as likely as Miller or Fast.
Lindberg's last season in Sweden, and his 2d half w HWP, were stellar.
After that, who knows?
All three have a shot at being legitimate 2nd liners in the NHL. If things break 100% right, one of them might even make it to first liner status. Remember that JT is only 21 (and scored over a PPG in his AHL games last year), while Fast and Lindberg are both 22 and coming off their first years in NA hockey (and Fast has shown he can play the NHL's defensive game).
I love following the prospects, but it seems to me there's a lot more hope than evidence with these guys.
We dont know if Kristo, DuClair or St.Croix have the two-way game or the strength to be succesful small NHL'ers,
Size is not an issue for Kristo - and shouldn't be for Duclair. Neither is extremely tall, but both have solid builds. For St. Croix you may have a point. As for the two-way game, Kristo's failures there have everything to do with his head and nothing with his shoulders. Regarding Duclair, after his amazing season last year, it almost sounds like you're inventing reasons for him to fail. Sure, he could - but his trajectory went about as well as could have been hoped had he been a top ten first round pick!
if Hrivik or Yogan will be consistent,
You may be right here. At this point, I have a lot more hope for Hrivik than Yogan, but certainly neither is better than a 50% shot (likely 20% for Yogan).
if Boo's freshman year was as good as he'll get (my friends in Ann Arbor were down on him at season's end),
Definitely a disappointment, but again young. Let's see if he bounces back this year before we call him a bust. But, yes, that risk is definitely there.
how Buchnevich will develop, or if he'll even leave Russia,
Ok, this is just silly. You could use the first point about ANY prospect and the second one about ANY Russian prospect. Again, it sounds like you're inventing reasons for him to fail - like Duclair, his season went about as well as it could have gone considering he was playing as an 18 year old in the KHL. (And don't forget he was a PPG in the U20s.) Why are you not happy about them?
if Nicholls or Haggerty have good enough all-round game
Not sure how you group Nicholls and Haggerty in the same group when Haggerty has never played a pro game. Of course he COULD be a bust, let's see him play a bit first before we judge, eh?
McCarthy I know little about
Me neither. Curious to see him in rookie camp and at Traverse City. As with Haggerty, I want to see him play in the pros before I start making predictions about him.
Kantor has that same shot as lots of physical guys, to be 4th liners for a few years
Agreed.
Sometimes i think the best hopes are
Tambellini, who i think was slowed by changing teams last season, but has size, skill and pedigree
or Fogarty as righty 3rd-4th line center with size, faceoff ability and a rounded game.
I put Tambellini at about the same level of riskiness as Boo. Fogarty... eh, maybe he eventually turns into a Brian Boyle type IF everything breaks right? He's one I'm actually much more down on than you are.
i hope I am wrong many times here.
fire away and tell us why.
I've been hearing some good things about Mat Bodi, who NY signed as NCAA UFA. While smaller sized for NHL defense, I have read a lot of good things about him. He was captain of the NCAA championship winning team, a great puck mover and compared to the likes of Torey Krug. Speaking to people who have watched a lot of his games, as well as Krug when he was in college, the consensus was that he is a better player than Krug. I'm interested to see how he handles himself in camp.
I've been hearing some good things about Mat Bodi, who NY signed as NCAA UFA. While smaller sized for NHL defense, I have read a lot of good things about him. He was captain of the NCAA championship winning team, a great puck mover and compared to the likes of Torey Krug. Speaking to people who have watched a lot of his games, as well as Krug when he was in college, the consensus was that he is a better player than Krug. I'm interested to see how he handles himself in camp.
I was just about to post about Bodie. I mean at the end of the day NCAA FAs are a real long shot. But if he can be the NYR version of Krug that solves a LOT of issues if Stralman walks. Would inject much needed offense on te blueline.
A tall order? Definitely. But it's something in the pipeline at least.
Bodie's another leftie. I don't see what he does to potentially replace Stralman.
He would bring a puck-moving element to a defensive group that sorely lacks it. To me the RH/LH infatuation is overblown at times.
This is gonna sound stupid, but do "crease clearers" even exist anymore? I feel like this is an old school thought because usually when I see someone defending space in front of the net they get called for cross checking or tripping.
I got see Bodie a lot during his Union career, thanks to good timing of a connection on campus during these years of success.I've been hearing some good things about Mat Bodi, who NY signed as NCAA UFA. While smaller sized for NHL defense, I have read a lot of good things about him. He was captain of the NCAA championship winning team, a great puck mover and compared to the likes of Torey Krug.
I'm excited at the thought of a big right handed shot on the powerplay. I'd appreciate it if any of our resident scouts could give me a breakdown on him, especially his speed. Is this article that says he's a powerful skater accurate?
http://www.hockeysfuture.com/articles/104605/carey-morrison-among-top-available-ncaa-free-agents/
Who do you guys see being a bigger impact player ... Skjei or McIlrath?