Larrybiv
We're CLEAN, we PROMISE!
He seems to be adept at retrieving pucks, and getting it to his teammates. That is ESSENTIAL on PP's, me thinks.he's been really good on it, tbh.
Last edited:
He seems to be adept at retrieving pucks, and getting it to his teammates. That is ESSENTIAL on PP's, me thinks.he's been really good on it, tbh.
Have to be patient with Kakko. He has always been a blend of power and skill. Now he is playing in the best league in the world at 19 years old. It is going to take him some time to gain confidence that he can be that same player against the best in the world.He did improve some this game, but like you said, he needs to show more of it. For him to get more assists and set up people, he has to be willing and able to hunt the puck into the dirty areas of the ice. You can now see this is not really his forte, which is why he might languish on the third line. I always thought he would make a great power forward. I now have my doubts. Where as Lafreniere already fits the bill.
Thinking the same. Rather lose the 1st and win the 2nd, than other way around. Now, moving forward we feel more confident to destroy the Debbies.Let the isles sit with that hot shit simmering in their stomach for a couple days like we all just did
Just dawned on me, no stars of the game or broadway hat?
Thats okay, the diehards take it the worst. I kept it to a minimium, while others did the whining for me. Because indeed......it was only one game, but was nevertheless disappointing. We werent going to be 56-0, right?Same. It was so unlike myself, but I just knew the Rangers would f*** up my night on Thursday, and it pissed me off.
Think hes going to be just fine. Rookie mistakes et al. He has so much raw talent its incredible. Coaches see it, and he'll get by simply with that. Intelligence he has aplenty. He'll learn.I will say, Miller looked night and day more comfortable out there. Not surprising of course.
I questioned if he was ready after game 1, he looked the part tonight.
Yes, he did. Something in the nature that maybe he was nervous, and maybe he wanted me to score.....something like that. Have a difficult enough time with English, so understanding his dialect.....well, I tried.And he did make fun of Sorokin, right?
Everyone had to exclude multiple players, there were much more than 3. Gave some love to Smitty as well, as he legit got it going early with his scruffle, then made that amazing defensive play heading up great pass to Panarin, and other plays I cant remember due to Jim Beam's extra aged.I should have voted for him. Dang. But really, so many guys were good. I gave Smith some love. He is the perfect bottom pair D aside from the penalties. Miller was good too. He’s showing flashes. And he’s not trying to do too much. He’s playing safe. He’s like a smart version of Brady Skjei.
Yeah, that will open up little more space for him to REALLY get going, get his feet wet, get on scoreboard.....all of that good shit.I would keep Laf on that line with Bread and replace Strome with Chytil. But I would make a shit coach, so I dunno.
Don't think it will take that long. This kid is special, that ONE PLAY you mentioned, will be part of his repertoire as soon as he feels "comfortable" and the coaches give him the "okay" to do certain things while patting him on the back. Which is PRICELESS to them youngins.Just wait until he gets more experience under his belt.
His problems are really more geared towards trying to do too much which we've seen in both of these games, but he also stepped up in the NZ and intercepted a pass which none of our other D would have done.
I cannot wait to see the player he is when hes 23-24.
Ehhh didn't they go 1-9? Tony skates around more to move people when he has the puck. Fox was pretty stationary at the top.Obviously Tony will be back next game, but I’d leave Fox on the top PP unit, it’s his job to lose it, imo.
There's a lot of bias put on Johnson before he got here, outside of that odd penalty he took the first game i think he's been worth his contract so far. He's been good in front of the net, his first pass is quick and on the tape. I get the feeling the best compliment he'll ever get here is "he hasn't been horrible".
One is way more obvious than the other but no reason we shouldn’t have both. Strome is just kinda there almost in the damn way on the pp lol.DeAngelo or Fox on PP1 isn't the convo we should be having....
Replacing Strome on the top unit is though.
Smith and Miller were a very good pairing last night. Buchnevich's second goal was just an outstanding shot. The thing with Pavel is he's continued to round out his game from year to year. The question eventually will be 'can we afford him?' but really he's still improving as a player IMO.
On the scratching of Tony D. Tony should be playing a lot this year---there's no question he is a top notch offensive minded D. There are issues sometimes between players and the coaching staff though and getting out ahead of them sometimes is the best way to go. Tony lost his composure the other night and even though at that point the game was pretty much lost already---it wasn't necessary and FWIW it could be another player that does the same and gets scratched for losing it too.
Fox was excellent on the pp last night
Have to be patient with Kakko. He has always been a blend of power and skill. Now he is playing in the best league in the world at 19 years old. It is going to take him some time to gain confidence that he can be that same player against the best in the world.
Also, playing more of a power game against grown men takes a bit of maturation time. He isn't the ultra-fast, skilled 19 year old entering the league where he can flash some brilliance.
He's done it at every level. He can do it here. It's up to him to reach his potential.
What for, the pick we used for K'Andre Miller or for trading us Ryan Lindgren?I really wanna take time out this morning to thank the Boston Bruins