Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 82,306
- 60,638
Jagr was 33 or 34 and past his prime, which makes it even more impressive than Lindros. I was not aware awards were handed out based on "next one" status
Crosby 2006-07.
Jagr was 33 or 34 and past his prime, which makes it even more impressive than Lindros. I was not aware awards were handed out based on "next one" status
I think Lindros deserved the Hart and correctly won it. In my opinion, Hasek had a better Hart argument for 1993-94. during which he was absolutely remarkable.
Coffey for the Hart in 1995? That seems unlikely to me because (to me) he was better in 1983-84 and 1984-85 than in 1995, and he wasn't even close to the Hart back then.
Crosby 2006-07.
Sid deserved that Hart in 2007. The top 5 that year were Crosby, Luongo, Brodeur, Lecavalier and Thornton. No doubt the best forward that year was Crosby. Brodeur broke Bernie Parent's single season wins record with 48 wins and Luongo tied it with 47 (side note, Holtby has 48 wins in 2016 but that still remains the record even with shootouts). To be honest Brodeur and Luongo both had more or less identical type seasons and picking one is like picking a trip to Hawaii or Bahamas. You can't go wrong. I personally pick Brodeur over Luongo that year, but it was close, as was Vezina voting. But Sid definitely deserved it in 2007. He was the NHL's best player that year.