FriendlyGhost92
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2023
- 4,156
- 4,954
Raymond and Seider got signed so now the management whiners have moved on to complaining about MBN's potential league assignment lmao.
no, some of them are complaining about kasper shooting lowRaymond and Seider got signed so now the management whiners have moved on to complaining about MBN's potential league assignment lmao.
LOL, I never complained about the RFA contract negotiations this summer, in fact I was setting up for the eventual management whining that's gonna happen when Kasper gets sent down.no, some of them are complaining about kasper shooting low
We have too many kids in GR already. If Kasper and Mazur gone then MBN should play in GR. They should have some veterans.
Kasper, Mazur, Lombardi, Danielson, Finnie, Hanas, Ruchlovsky, Doucet and Becher I hope
Where do you put Becher?
Of course it's better if he gets another year in Sweden. There are extremely few European players that benefit from playing NHL/AHL hockey right after the draft.I think he’s a pretty smart, versatile player who you could plug in play in the SHL or AHL and he’d do alright. Off the ice, I wonder if he’d be best served having another year in Sweden before uprooting to NA.
Of course it's better if he gets another year in Sweden. There are extremely few European players that benefit from playing NHL/AHL hockey right after the draft.
Of course it's better if he gets another year in Sweden. There are extremely few European players that benefit from playing NHL/AHL hockey right after the draft.
I do wonder how NHL teams approach this topic, do they follow some game book? I'm guessing that it's highly dependent on the individual and it's always a judgement call where the prospect should play.
Would be fun though if they have a spreadsheet where a player is most likely to best develop certain skills. Like AHL for improving your bus riding ability. Rögle to improve that dog in you, and so on.
Of course it's better if he gets another year in Sweden. There are extremely few European players that benefit from playing NHL/AHL hockey right after the draft.
From what I know, he would be the first player going from Swedish tier 2 hockey to the NHL in his draft year. Where he also didn't have 0.5 PPG. I would be absolutely SHOCKED if anyone thought he's NHL ready.And you normally don't see a kid they just drafted in the big club's training camp either. Why? Because they believe MBN is more mature than a typical 18 yr old, both when it comes to his game and his personality.
A year in Sweden could be a waste of time if he's close to NHL ready, then it's better to stay in the minors and get to know his future linemates.
So I'd say we'll see him play in the AHL, then he'll be available. But I think it also depends on where he wants to play.
There are countless of examples of players that has gone from the SHL to the NHL without having to stopover in the AHL. Especially forwards. Especially if they've taken 1-2 years extra in the SHL. I mean, Elias Pettersson and Peter Forsberg are just two prime examples of that. I'm also of the belief that it's better for a young player to be coached and developed in a language he can fully understand in a pro environment to be better prepared for the NHL.There is plenty of good things to learn in the AHL compared to SHL. More physical game, tighter quarters to work with, also more NA style of game where they can work on stuff. If he isn't getting prime minutes in Sweden I would much rather he be in GR if he is ready to come over as he seems to be.
Most Swedes I’ve met speak English better than North Americans.From what I know, he would be the first player going from Swedish tier 2 hockey to the NHL in his draft year. Where he also didn't have 0.5 PPG. I would be absolutely SHOCKED if anyone thought he's NHL ready.
There are countless of examples of players that has gone from the SHL to the NHL without having to stopover in the AHL. Especially forwards. Especially if they've taken 1-2 years extra in the SHL. I mean, Elias Pettersson and Peter Forsberg are just two prime examples of that. I'm also of the belief that it's better for a young player to be coached and developed in a language he can fully understand in a pro environment to be better prepared for the NHL.
I'm very curious to see what you all do with Nygaard. I would think it comes down to a couple of things, IMO. One, would he ever be a call-up this year for an injury. And two, will he physically develop better in SHL or AHL. My money is on the latter, simply because he's in a position, right now, to still be a top 6 forward in the AHL and he'll get more PP time down there as well. SHL is still very limiting on younger players and I think especially since the SHL has been in progress for a little bit now, I think they would be hesitant to give him the kind of playing time and opportunities that he would easily get in the AHL for you guys.
Euro teams also seem to be vet heavy moreso and where the player is going to get good ice time is also a factor.
I wouldn't question that MBN wouldn't get ice time in SHL. Like i said in my previous post, MBN's contract with Skellefteå was announced in May but contract was done months before it. So obviously Skellefteå's coaching staff and sports director has a role planned out for him. Otherwise they wouldn't have signed him and MBN wouldn't have signed with them. Teams in Europe don't spent money on players that they ain't planning to use.If he isn't getting prime minutes in Sweden I would much rather he be in GR if he is ready to come over as he seems to be.
I wouldn't question that MBN wouldn't get ice time in SHL. Like i said in my previous post, MBN's contract with Skellefteå was announced in May but contract was done months before it. So obviously Skellefteå's coaching staff and sports director has a role planned out for him. Otherwise they wouldn't have signed him and MBN wouldn't have signed with them. Teams in Europe don't spent money on players that they ain't planning to use.
I would question more that MBN would get top minutes in GR, there will be Kasper, Mazur and Danielson in the top-6 and in PP units. And the vets, Snively and Dries. That leaves one spot open in the top-6 and we have Söderblom, whose contract ends after this season and I'll bet Wings wants to see if he is worth re-signing. Then the late bloomer Rychlovsky, whom Wings signed with 2-year deal in June. He's the type of player who is almost useless without PP time and since Wings signed him and he ain't our draft pick, I'll bet that they want to see what they got. Lombardi needs PP minutes too and the bottom-6 vets Shine and Gettinger is there for grit and PK-role.
--------------------
This starts to remind me when Kasper was picked and some people were desperate to get Kasper to NA. Same ice time/smaller rink excuses were used then too but as it was proved, it was a correct decision to leave Kasper in Sweden for a year.
Jesper Bratt did it in 2016. He was picked in the 6th round. Crazy development.From what I know, he would be the first player going from Swedish tier 2 hockey to the NHL in his draft year. Where he also didn't have 0.5 PPG. I would be absolutely SHOCKED if anyone thought he's NHL ready.
There are countless of examples of players that has gone from the SHL to the NHL without having to stopover in the AHL. Especially forwards. Especially if they've taken 1-2 years extra in the SHL. I mean, Elias Pettersson and Peter Forsberg are just two prime examples of that. I'm also of the belief that it's better for a young player to be coached and developed in a language he can fully understand in a pro environment to be better prepared for the NHL.
You can't argue that extra year in Sweden didn't help Kasper to mature more. Or Seider or Ray or Ed.It doesn't prove anything with Kasper. He could be where he is at right now if he had come to GR a year sooner. There is no definitive way to prove either side was right.
Seider did his year in Sweden after going to NA, so that isn't a great example here.You can't argue that extra year in Sweden didn't help Kasper to mature more. Or Seider or Ray or Ed.
Still counts imo, could Seider been in Calder year shape if there wasn't for a year in Sweden in a massive role and leading his team to the finals. Maybe, maybe not.Seider did his year in Sweden after going to NA, so that isn't a great example here.
With MBN I lean towards NA because of the guys I think he will be playing with. If they are committing to running him with a Danielson, Kasper, and Mazur type to start trying to find chemistry I am for it. He has a big body and plays the right way, I think we can fast track some of his development in GR this year. I don't think he loses out going back to Sweden, but I would rather keep him over here based on what I have seen.