Hollywood Cannon
I'm Away From My Desk
You know, I wanted to see if he celebrated the win at his end of the ice when they won in the shootout, but no one caught shit.
You know, I wanted to see if he celebrated the win at his end of the ice when they won in the shootout, but no one caught shit.
I think they're very happy with Torts, for a number of reasons.The most likely outcome is the Flyers still spinning their wheels. Not contending in the next 5 years or anytime soon.
Do you think Torst will be the coach for the 2025-2026 season to start? What is the most likely scenario in your opinion.
I get what you mean.
For me personally, it’s not about half measures or starting a Crusade over the term rebuilding. There are two major related problems with allowing Michkov’s presence to give me hope. First is Briere’s answer to Charlie’s Buium question because it’s indefensible logic.
But more importantly, it’s the organizational arrogance that to me is their hallmark through 5 front office generations. The idea that the Flyers stocked up on the 2025 draft years in advance and were perfectly fine taking less traditional value to do so means that from the very top, they have no idea of their own limitations. This is one issue that doesn’t change no matter your field.
Arrogance kills one holy hell of a lot more careers than it makes. Maybe it’ll work this time. Outliers do exist. But probably not.
No problem. It was sourced from this Twitter post if you care also.Thanks for that. I couldn't find it anywhere. Yeah, that seems like a big weight was lifted off him mentally with that.
Maybe, I know it's easy for us to feel that way after a decade + of absolute skullduggery and gaslighting.
But, a lot of people look at Jon Cooper as an example of a good hockey coach. And he's saying all of the same things you hear Torts say. Needs to develop a two-way game, needs to be more engaged, needs to be a complete player, needs to show me I can trust him.
Of course, TB had Stamkos, Hedman, Vasy, Point, Palat, and on and on, whereas the Flyers have... Konecny?
There's a huge talent disparity gap between the two teams, and maybe the Flyers waste Michkov's career like they did with Giroux.
But Kuch is 31 and playing his best hockey ever.
Surely the Flyers can cobble together something coherent over the next 12 years, right?
Let's start with Hagens. Damn this team deserves something good for once.
I don't buy Buium was too small, he was 6'0 186 at the combine, will probably end up 200+ lbs when it's all said and done. That's substantially bigger than York, Andrae or Drysdale.
Briere pretty much said they had Buium and Luchanko in similar tiers, they probably saw Buium as the better player, but Luchanko had more upside due to his age and lack of experience.
I think it's more about Luchanko being the fit to the style of play they want to implement, an up tempo aggressive forecheck. A fast high IQ center can cover for the other four on the ice and allow them to take more risks on offense.
I also think D-men like Buium are easier to find, Parkeh in the same draft, Huston, etc.
It's easier to find a top offensive D-man than a top center or physical mobile two way D-men.
The strategy is valid, if Luchanko is the same tier as Buium.
The question is whether their evaluation of their relative talent is valid.
No. Quite the opposite.Um didn't you repeatedly parrot the organization's claim that he was too small?
Tampa going easy in the shootout sums up @VladDrag breakaway attempt last nightNice for Fedotov to finally bag an NHL win. Tampa went easy on him in the shootout.
I really enjoy watching Andrae. Brink had some good moments today. Tippett's goal was a beauty.
Pretty pedestrian game, otherwise.
Briere all but said he was too small.I don't buy Buium was too small, he was 6'0 186 at the combine, will probably end up 200+ lbs when it's all said and done. That's substantially bigger than York, Andrae or Drysdale.
Briere pretty much said they had Buium and Luchanko in similar tiers, they probably saw Buium as the better player, but Luchanko had more upside due to his age and lack of experience.
I think it's more about Luchanko being the fit to the style of play they want to implement, an up tempo aggressive forecheck. A fast high IQ center can cover for the other four on the ice and allow them to take more risks on offense.
I also think D-men like Buium are easier to find, Parkeh in the same draft, Huston, etc.
It's easier to find a top offensive D-man than a top center or physical mobile two way D-men.
The strategy is valid, if Luchanko is the same tier as Buium.
The question is whether their evaluation of their relative talent is valid.
I think Briere's point was that he didn't fit what they were looking for in a D-man.Briere all but said he was too small.
What did you do 2 weeks later?I've only played that once bb
Personal attacks aren’t good ideas. We all have opinions that others disagree with. No need to rip on a poster.We are talking about the Flyers and that is what matters. Everything else is white noise and you're deflecting.
The Flyers do a not do a good a job overall. Where did they upgrade the scouting and development?
Serious question. Do the Flyers pay you? Do you go on other sites and defend them as well? If they don't make up a resume as you may be able to make some coin off your post. I bet you and "Jonesy" would be best buds.
That's the point. They didn't think Buium was special, "rush to the podium and get your pick in."No one thinks Buium is on Michkov's level as a prospect. We do not have to do this every time where we twist ourselves into pretzels to justify what they openly said out loud.
BPA presumes a player is clearly better.Agree, that means they will probably not take the BPA. Whoever they take will be years away and contribute in any meaningful way bu 27/28 season when they want to "contend".
What personal attack? Not sure where you come up with "ripping" on a poster from.
That's the point. They didn't think Buium was special, "rush to the podium and get your pick in."
They liked him but they also liked Luchanko
In three years we'll know if they mis-evaluated Luchanko or identified a rising talent.
BPA presumes a player is clearly better.
Teams tend to lump players in tiers of similarly valued players, b/c the difference within a tier is probably too small to be meaningful (you're often comparing apples and oranges). If you're using other criteria to choose within a tier, you're still going BPA.
Reaching is when you take a player from a lower tier.
I think Briere's point was that he didn't fit what they were looking for in a D-man.
That's not the point. Please listen to what I'm saying instead of telling me. There are two tiers of prospect for me between a Michkov and a Luchanko. Buium is on one of those two.
We won't know anything for sure in 3 years because development is not this reductive no matter how many times you say it is.
If they thought the two players were in the same tier, then they made the right move.
That is, the strategy was correct (take the player who is a better fit), the question is whether their talent evaluation was correct.
Now I presume with video editors, scouts, etc. they put far more resources into talent evaluation than amateurs do. Whether they do so correctly? That's for time to tell.
My suspicion is they initially had Luchanko far lower, but after a closer look saw a kid filling out his body, maybe getting even faster (as he adds lower body strength) showing playmaking ability (with inferior linemates), etc. They may think he has the potential to further develop.
With Buium it's possible scouts looked at him and started to think he's a very good player but filled out early, a hard worker who maxed out his physical potential (think Provorov). So "what you see is what you get," which would explain why he dropped.
None of this means they're right. Projecting 18 year olds is a really difficult task
No then they still made the wrong move. This years draft is C heavy, last years draft was D heavy. In those specific scenarios you will almost always have a prospect who is very good fall. In this D heavy draft it was Buium. They should have picked him with the knowledge that next year they can get their 1C prospect in a C heavy draft (having 3 1st round picks no less).If they thought the two players were in the same tier, then they made the right move.
That is, the strategy was correct (take the player who is a better fit), the question is whether their talent evaluation was correct.