Kill time1st looks like a 1st line
Not sure what our 4th line is meant to achieve with the personnel it has on it
Not sure. I asked this a couple days ago. It's a genuine question, not an argument.What about DeAngelo in his own zone is an issue?
I’d play this kid 20 mins a night every night not sure why anyone wouldn’t.
I have also been wondering. Maybe we’re missing something.Not sure. I asked this a couple days ago. It's a genuine question, not an argument.
I understand he occasionally has looked lost in the D zone but he was still learning the system. In the regular system he’s been good enough. I think the whole defensive liability narrative gets over blown because he’s offensive. Ie Offensive defenseman means he’s not defenseNot sure. I asked this a couple days ago. It's a genuine question, not an argument.
What if all the benchings positively impacted how he's playing?Not sure. I asked this a couple days ago. It's a genuine question, not an argument.
It probably looks that way because the Ducks...uhm...suck.These D pairs are working pretty well.
They looked solid the other night in San Jose too.It probably looks that way because the Ducks...uhm...suck.
Yes, even Staal looks decent. If we kept these pairings the same way until the end of the season, I would be very happy.These D pairs are working pretty well.
They worked pretty well last game, too. And the Ducks may suck, but on paper, they aren’t that bad.It probably looks that way because the Ducks...uhm...suck.
Soooooooo, how many games to make Buch an offensive force?What if all the benchings positively impacted how he's playing?
![]()
yeah so anyway that period was garbo and I can only imagine Spooner is being showcased because that was some shameful cowardice
These D pairs are working pretty well.
In college they’d had student tickets for $6.50. And my buddy knows a trick to sneak into the middle level club section and we’d sit down there