Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
+ 1 to 2 more top 6 wingers, depending on your view of Hartman.1C, top-4 LD and RD those are the 3 roster holes (not counting goalie). So really it's one thing of greater importance.
+ 1 to 2 more top 6 wingers, depending on your view of Hartman.1C, top-4 LD and RD those are the 3 roster holes (not counting goalie). So really it's one thing of greater importance.
1C, top-4 LD and RD those are the 3 roster holes (not counting goalie). So really it's one thing of greater importance.
+ 1 to 2 more top 6 wingers, depending on your view of Hartman.
The 3?
Kaprizov - X - Boldy
X - Eriksson Ek - X
X - Rossi - Hartman
Foligno - X - X
X - Faber
Brodin - Spurgeon
Middleton - X
X
Gustavsson
Those are the holes in this lineup
Kap/x/Zucc(Rossi)
Boldy/JEE/Rossi(Zucc)
Ohgren/Hartman/Foligno
Lauko/Trenin/12FWD (whoever takes the spot, lots of options)
x/Faber
Brodin/x
Middleton/BoGo
Pretty much. And we probably need 2 the X's in the top 6 to better than Eriksson Ek, and possibly the one next to Faber to be better than Faber.The 3?
Kaprizov - X - Boldy
X - Eriksson Ek - X
X - Rossi - Hartman
Foligno - X - X
X - Faber
Brodin - Spurgeon
Middleton - X
X
Gustavsson
Those are the holes in this lineup
Keep coming in here expecting Zeev Buium talk and see bickering. Our board sucks sometimes lol. Wonder if other teams do this.
They do.Keep coming in here expecting Zeev Buium talk and see bickering. Our board sucks sometimes lol. Wonder if other teams do this.
This is a thread about a defenseman… hence why the topic is around defense.So is half of the top 6. And the entirety of the net.
I'll take Spurgeon in his spot over Zucc and Fleury (and last year's Gus) in theirs any day.
The discussion was plenty fine until what-about-isms came into play.This discussion should probably continue in the general thread, we've gotten way off topic
Brodin-Spurgeon is also a problem (too soft). So if Buium is top pair, the Spurgeon problem still persists.Pretty much. And we probably need 2 the X's in the top 6 to better than Eriksson Ek, and possibly the one next to Faber to be better than Faber.
I think that you are overestimating how many good Dmen there are in the league. Most 2nd pairing D have flaws in their game, especially #4's. Middleton is solid, but just has slow feet, though by no means the slowest in the league. No genius with the puck, but he scored 25 points last year- that's damn good.He’s not a top 4 guy on a contender. Him being in our top 4 is not a good thing.
Brodin is considered by most hockey observers to be certainly a top 5 defensive Dman, and by some metrics, the best, in the league. Now he's not physical enough? It's like you're not happy with your Porsche because you can't carry sheets of plywood in it.Brodin-Spurgeon is also a problem (too soft). So if Buium is top pair, the Spurgeon problem still persists.
Spurgeon has 3 years left and Buium is going back to Denver for one of those.Brodin-Spurgeon is also a problem (too soft). So if Buium is top pair, the Spurgeon problem still persists.
Middleton was on the ice for the most 5v5 goals against for the entire team. His goals against per 60 is the worst by far of the guys that actually matter. His per 60 numbers were only better than Maroon, Addison, and Walker. Is that acceptable for someone who’s best attributes are geared towards the defensive zone?I think that you are overestimating how many good Dmen there are in the league. Most 2nd pairing D have flaws in their game, especially #4's. Middleton is solid, but just has slow feet, though by no means the slowest in the league. No genius with the puck, but he scored 25 points last year- that's damn good.
Look at the D that were being trotted out for EDM and FLA, two SC finalists. Nurse and Ceci were hilariously bad at times, Ekblad is a shadow of his former self, and has been for years. Same with OEL. Then there is Kulikov, the guy we benched during the playoffs, etc..
Brodin is considered by most hockey observers to be certainly a top 5 defensive Dman, and by some metrics, the best, in the league. Now he's not physical enough? It's like you're not happy with your Porsche because you can't carry sheets of plywood in it.
It’s less than a year. Buium is going to make the team at the end of the year.Spurgeon has 3 years left and Buium is going back to Denver for one of those.
They'll be on the same team for 2 years, and I wouldn't etch Buium in stone on the top pair quite yet (he'll be 2 years behind Faber in that regard).
I also don't agree that a "Spurgeon Problem" exists, so I'm not too worried about a Brodin/Faber, Buium/Spurgeon top 4, pending how Spurgeon looks coming back from a year-canceling injury. Team scoring in the playoffs is much more of a factor than him individually.
So 2 years + ~3 games then.It’s less than a year. Buium is going to make the team at the end of the year.
Would be immensely curious as to what the proposed solution would be to the "Brodin-Faber, Buium-Spurgeon problem". If it were easy to swap Spurgeon and Brodin for guys who are bigger and stronger and tougher and better, every team would do it.
So great, you've identified Middleton, Spurgeon and Brodin as the problem, what's the solution?
Playoffs.So 2 years + ~3 games then.
The first step is identifying that it is a problem. Which, in case you couldn’t tell from the backlash, is clearly not agreed upon. Sounds like most of you are just peachy with how it is currently set up. I’m not.Would be immensely curious as to what the proposed solution would be to the "Brodin-Faber, Buium-Spurgeon problem". If it were easy to swap Spurgeon and Brodin for guys who are bigger and stronger and tougher and better, every team would do it.
So great, you've identified Middleton, Spurgeon and Brodin as the problem, what's the solution?
Who were your trade targets? Who were your UFA targets?The solution would have been trading for guys that better fit what we need or finding UFA dmen who can fill the spot or maybe giving a guy like Spacek a 10 game sample to see what he’s got.
Dumba for 1-2 years or big Z for free agents.Who were your trade targets? Who were your UFA targets?
Brodin has an NMC through this upcoming year, and Spurgeon had one through last year. What was your method of moving them off of the team?
Dumba isn't good.Dumba for 1-2 years or big Z for free agents.
I’m not looking to move Brodin. I’m good with him being the one soft player in the top 4. Spurgeon on the 3rd pair until we can offload his contract.
In the case of Dumba, to end this upcoming year:
Brodin-Dumba
Buium-Faber
Middleton-Spurgeon
Brodin-Dumba was great at shutting down top lines two seasons ago.Dumba isn't good.
I give full credit to one of them for that.Brodin-Dumba was great at shutting down top lines two seasons ago.