Shouldn't of called the phantom interference that gave the Pens a PP either.
That was a lousy call and indicative of a bigger problem in this league - what is and isn't a penalty is ****ing random. High stick? Missed. Clear interference? Missed.
Weakest possible definition of interference off a face-off? Called. Blatant trip? Missed.
Goes both ways every night...the reffing in this league is ****ing atrocious and, worst of all, is consistently inconsistent.
Well why is Dumoulin going after Oshie on a clean hit?
Why should Oshie have to fight?
Never said Oshie should have fought. If you think that Oshie didn't commit a foul (which is reasonable) then Dumoulin most certainly didn't. He challenged Oshie, Oshie didn't accept, and that was that. It's not like Dumoulin went in fists flying.
First penalty minutes of the season for Dumoulin, FWIW.
And I'm not sorry about feeling that those hits shouldn't be in the game. The Penguins have lost multiple players to "clean" hits a couple feet from the boards this year and we're not alone. Calling anything that happens along the board has the unfortunate side-effect of the hits moving further out, and those plays are arguably even more dangerous.
I'm certainly not calling for a major or a suspension, but in my book that'd be a minor...certainly more-so than that cheeky interference play earlier.