Vegas will not be a garden variety hockey town. They are all about entertainment. They would take Gaborik for nothing. Have you looked around at what skill in the forward ranks they are likely to get from the draft? They have to compete with all the shows going on in the city at any one time. They need their team to be exciting to watch with the ability to build an audience right from the get go.
I'd say the Kings are in a more desperate position than Vegas. Would you take Gaborik for nothing if you knew the Kings cap situation? He had 12 whole goals, will be 35, and misses 25% of games.
I think Vegas taking Gaborik straight up in the expansion draft is nothing but hope. This isn't the Gaborik from Minnesota. If it happens, great, but I'm not seeing it. It either costs the Kings something good, or he's not going anywhere.
Well, like I said, I think 8 year deals that take non-star players well into their 30's is a bad idea.
Yeah, but I don't know any GM that would've done those two deals differently. The captain of the team, and a guy that had a great playoff. I don't think there's a GM smart enough to not do those deals. All the other stuff, yes, but not Brown and Gaborik, and not with the timing of those deals.
The Gaborik signing for 7 years was to lower the cap hit, which again, is a flawed and terrible strategy. Should have signed Gabby to a 3-4 year deal for $6m a season rather than 7 years at $5m AAV. But again Dean Lombardi just couldn't look at things rationally and HAD to have the extra money to use towards bringing back Greene and Richards. Both of whom were basically at the end of their careers and could have easily been replaced by rookies making the minimum, but no Dean added $8m of cap hits to bring them back.
$18m-$24m is a lot less than the $34m Gaborik got in the contract. He was brought in because Brown stopped scoring, then led the Kings in goals on their way to a Cup, and Lombardi didn't have the guts to walk away. Tough to think any GM would've in that situation.
Gaborik would be attractive to a contender at the deadline if he were an UFA or even had one year left, with another four years after this one he has zero trade value, even with his "reduced" cap hit.
I'm sorry, there is no other way describe this but as a huge disaster by the GM. Other than the Lecavalier trade everything Dean has touched since 2014 has turned to ****. Below avg. NHL roster, awful contracts, awful pipeline. I hate to say this but I think the JQ injury may in the long run be one of the best things to happen to this team, it's going to give us a top pick and hopefully forces Dean's hand at the deadline to dump off some people.
Well at least he didn't do all he probably could've to re-sign Lucic. He finally didn't compound a mistake when he had the chance not to. He finally stopped believing in the roster this summer, as shown by the moves he did make.
I still think had they gone out to the Sharks in 2014 the way they did in 2016, what's happening right now would've happened back then. Richards would've been bought out, Greene let go, Gaborik not signed. The 2015 and 2016 picks aren't dealt. Everything would've been different. After the crazy run, Lombardi thought they could manage to do anything. If they make the playoffs in 2015, I'm not sure the Lucic deal gets made. I think that deal was made because it was the 2016 pick that went to Carolina, and you didn't want Carolina winning that lottery with the Kings pick.