Choralone
Registered User
If Forbort is a good player this season and beyond, I don't give a crap how high he was drafted or how long he took to develop. The past can't be undone and we can't redo the 2010 draft.
Yup, looking very similar to Gravel's development curve. Not something I expect out of a mid first round pick.
Forbort was drafted in 2010. His draft is approaching 7 years. He'll be turning 25 in March, and he still hasn't figured out how to use his gangly 6'4" frame.
People aren't spoiled by Doughty. People are afraid that the Kings burned a high pick on yet another Jeff Schultz or Keaton Ellerby, tall, awkward defensemen who were way too timid to stay at this level.
The Kings have nothing to lose playing him now. Might as well showcase him if things don't work out. He definitely hasn't developed into the player they thought they were getting when they selected him.
What kind of a procedure is not surgery?
What kind of a procedure is not surgery?
What kind of non-surgical procedure fixes a tear?
If Forbort is a good player this season and beyond, I don't give a crap how high he was drafted or how long he took to develop. The past can't be undone and we can't redo the 2010 draft.
Did we have a chance in hell to trade for PK Subban?
Heard about a brand of chiropractic for soft tissue work a while ago. Wonder if it could be something like that where they adjust the soft tissue to get it to heal better.
Great if Forbort turns into an NHL'er. My point was people should stop *****ing about the McNabb trade because the Kings didn't have anyone on the roster to fill that hole at the time and they still don't have someone to replace McNabb's minutes in the top 4.
Also mid first round isn't really where you want to take projects.
Edit: Sorry, I'm grumpy today. Reached my limit on stupid for the day by 9am. Not that anyone on here is being stupid. Just I'm apparently in a bad mood.
Considering that Shea Weber went the other way, no.
Did we have a chance in hell to trade for PK Subban?
Yeah, Doughty would go the other way. Makes no sense.
I'm sure they would've accepted Kopitar as an alternative.
I'm sorry, but Kopitar for Subban is a terrible trade for the Kings. Sure we have a superstar defense, but zero offensive punch. We become Nashville at that point. Kopitar is a better hockey player than PK by quite he margin.
Now, if Subban could have been had for Carter+, then maybe you take a hard look at that. But Montreal wasn't asking for a forward, by all accounts, so it's moot.
We all knew he was a project though, even as a 1st.
I don't disagree but let's not ignore the roster that was blocking him even if he were ready. Who would he have forced off until last year, Martinez? Last year he should have been playing over Ehrhoff and that was a mistake in my eyes not getting him and Gravel in.
You can't over-ripen prospects. I don't see the issue. Maybe he wasn't ready for the first five years, but he looks like he fits in wonderfully now. Arguably been our third best d-man behind Doughty and Muzzin despite being set up with anchors.
You most certainly can over ripen players. Theres lots of players that where ruined because they never got their shot. Its just not as "visible" as rushing. And people like excuse it as "they were never good enough" which isnt neccessarily true. Yes the kopitars and doughtys will aleays rise to top. But for most the difference between long career and minor league washout is razor thin. Getting the right opportunity at the right time is the difference.
I would be interested to know what players you are saying that got over over ripen?
Have never known this to happen to a NHL level player.
I'd like to add, if you're upset about the McNabb trade, that anger should be focused at Forbort. A first round pick that took until he had to pass through waivers to make the team. If he developed in 2-3 years to a bottom pairing defender there's probably no need to trade for McNabb in the first place.
I mean, it's hard for me to think Forbort and not think Tarasenko. That pick was just a major error all around.
I mean, it's hard for me to think Forbort and not think Tarasenko. That pick was just a major error all around.
Considered the top Russian-born talent in the 2010 draft, Tarasenko slipped into the mid-first round due to concerns about his contract status in the KHL with Sibir Novosibirsk, the team coached by his father.
Read more at http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/vladimir_tarasenko/#4z2xfEl7EX1dAhh5.99
Especially when Tarasenko is one of the league's top goal scorers, an area in which the Kings need a lot of help in and continuously struggle to develop.
The worst thing about Forbort (and Teubert also) is the Kings traded up specifically to take them. It's one thing if you are picking and it comes to you and maybe you aren't crazy about someone but you just take them and hope.
The Kings targeted both those players, meaning they heavily scouted both and felt they were worth giving up assets for. That is the most disappointing thing.
Many passed for this reason: