SupersonicMonkey*
Guest
If Miller sticks I have to imagine Boyle gets traded. He is more valuable that way than a 4C depending on the return.
Doesn't seem Iikely at this point, however.
The minute our PK struggles, Boyle will be back in.
If Miller sticks I have to imagine Boyle gets traded. He is more valuable that way than a 4C depending on the return.
Doesn't seem Iikely at this point, however.
Torts scratches Pickle Stew and Boyle in the same game? Didn't see that coming.
Yes we know. You've posted that message four times on the last two pages...i think by trading Rupp it shows Rangers want to get quicker up front.... especially trading for Powe.. i think a Boyle for some quick forward or a depth dman is in the works... Boyle doesnt really have value here anymore....
i think by trading Rupp it shows Rangers want to get quicker up front.... especially trading for Powe.. i think a Boyle for some quick forward or a depth dman is in the works... Boyle doesnt really have value here anymore....
Those things are not valuable.Faceoffs, PK, and playing a defensive role. Which he's good at.
Yes we know. You've posted that message four times on the last two pages...
Dave Lozo @DaveLozo
I have to say, I'm a little disappointed that both Brian Boyle and Matt Carkner aren't playing tonight. I'm a bloodthirsty animal, though.
Those things are not valuable.
The things that are valuable are:
- Goals
- Not falling down- Fights (only if you win, or are small)
- Hits (again only smaller players)
- Smooth skating stride
Again, we know.oops lol sorry.. i just dont understand why people still think he is a good player... i wish the Rangers dealt him when his value was actually good. what team needs a player with size that is mainly useful on the PK and not good 5 on 5???
People are reading too much into this. I don't like Boyle really, but this benching isn't a sign of the Rangers exploring the market for him. It's just a kick in the ass to get him going, nothing more.
Boyle's more valuable to the Rangers than to what they'd receive in a trade for him, I think.
According to Capgeek, the Rangers would have $13,328,158 in cap space at the deadline. You must have big plans.I think they would get more than what the Rangers gave up for him.... he is overpaid for what he brings to the table....he would be a player to trade to get more cap space towards the deadline...
To be fair, this board has been shopping Boyle feverishly for a lot longer than that.Rookie plays strong first career NHL game.
Organization immediately begins feverish shopping of reliable 3C.
Rookie plays strong first career NHL game.
Organization immediately begins feverish shopping of reliable 3C.
JT Miller and Chris Kreider my friend. Would you rather sit them for Brian Boyle? FOH.
On the other hand I do wonder where they draw the line between motivational benching and losing your spot in the lineup. If Miller continued to play very well and seemed to provide everything Boyle did plus better forechecking/play with the puck, at what point are you ready to go ahead and give Miller that job on a permanent basis?
I'm sure they will.Why not switch Gaborik back to right wing and have Pyatt play left? I think Gaborik is more dangerous in his natural position.
Mostly wing.Did JT play center during the last game?
People are reading too much into this. I don't like Boyle really, but this benching isn't a sign of the Rangers exploring the market for him. It's just a kick in the ass to get him going, nothing more.
Boyle's more valuable to the Rangers than to what they'd receive in a trade for him, I think.
On the other hand I do wonder where they draw the line between motivational benching and losing your spot in the lineup. If Miller continued to play very well and seemed to provide everything Boyle did plus better forechecking/play with the puck, at what point are you ready to go ahead and give Miller that job on a permanent basis?