Firing Babcock would be a huge mistake. Not his fault that:
1) He had 9 new regulars in his lineup due to a top heavy salary cap
2) That Dermott, Hyman, Tavares, Marner, Kerfoot and Moore have all been injured at different times this season
3) That the Leafs had the worst schedule in entire NHL the first quarter of the season with 4 back to backs.
4) That the GM let go of the wrong backup goalie 2 seasons ago, and they don't have the cap to acquire a solid backup
Firing Babcock would be a copout for Dubas. Dubas is to blame for the contracts and cap, hes to blame for the backup goalie situation, and hes to blame for the type of players he acquired for Babcocks style of hockey. But yet everyone is calling for Babcock's head. Its plain stupid.
If I were Babcock, I would let the Leafs play their style of game to show up Dubas as Dubas has put Babcock in a position to fail. They will also fail playing their style of hockey as well cause you cannot win a cup that way.
The biggest issue with the back to backs is the lack of an adequate backup goalie. You have to consider the times you benefit from other team on B2B as well
Leafs have had 5 back to backs
Oct 5 mtl 6-5 loss SO
Oct 22 Boston 4-2 loss
Oct 26 mtl 5-2 loss
Nov 10 Hawks 5-4 loss
Nov 16 Pens 6-1 loss
The last 2 Hawks and Pens were both also playing 2nd half of B2B so not really unfair.
Leafs have played teams 3 other times when leafs are rested and other team is on 2nd half of b2b
San Jose Oct 25 leafs win 4-1
Nov 2 Philly leafs win 4-3 in SO
Oct 15 wild leafs win 4-2
So in the 3 games where Leafs were tired and other guys rested the lost all 3 getting on SO loss point, in the three where the opposition is tired they won all 3 one in shootout.
In the 2 where both teams are tired they lost giving a total of 11 goals.
That is not Babcocks fault, that is the no money to pay a backup problem