We already have evidence that Celebrini is going to be much better than any of those guys. Schaefer also seems like he's in another stratosphere compared to the Oilers examples (obvs no guarantee we get him).Hindsight is 50/50. Obviously we know now that none of those players was all that good, but at the time it was widely prognosticated that that would be an elite, Cup-winning starting lineup.
I'm swinging back to the idea of getting someone like Dobson, Bryam, Miller, or someone established like McAvoy.And who are we going to get on defense? We apparently aren't willing to give out big contracts in free agency. The majority of good players with term have some form of no-trade clauses.
I went through every team's cap sheet trying to identify top-4 defensemen that had no trade protection, more than one year on their existing contracts, and weren't on ELCs/core guys that won't get moved for any reason. The list is like, Niko Mikkola, Jordan Spence, Alexandre Carrier, Alex Romanov, Nick Jensen, JJ Moser, Sean Durzi, Michael Kesselring, Filip Hronek, Zach Whitecloud, Kaeden Korczak, Trevor Van Reimsdyk, and Dylan DeMelo. And I really stretched the definition of "top-4 D" on some of these guys.
There are several interesting RFAs, but most of them have arbitration rights and would have plenty of leverage to avoid becoming Sharks long-term.
So what are we even supposed to do, especially if we don't land Schaefer? Like, this is f***ing dire.
My assumption is that we are going to learn how this trade impacts us over the summer when Grier goes shopping with all his picks to improve the roster. Till then, we have incomplete information.I'm swinging back to the idea of getting someone like Dobson, Bryam, Miller, or someone established like McAvoy.
Just because Grier wasn't willing to pay Zetterlund big money (and presumably believes he's not a good fit come 26-27 and that he can be more easily replaced; after all, he was kind of a throw-in and I think Grier is confident he can find a new Zetterlund), doesn't mean he's not willing to pay other guys big money. I think that's what he's going for.
...
In any case, I certainly don't think that not having Zetterlund (and instead having a lot of pick ammunition) is "dire." I do think Zetterlund was traded below market value.
What happened to the Sharks being competitive on Celebrini's ELC? What happened to praising the Kings' rebuild? You've done a total 180 on these opinions and I'm genuinely confused what's going on.We already have evidence that Celebrini is going to be much better than any of those guys. Schaefer also seems like he's in another stratosphere compared to the Oilers examples (obvs no guarantee we get him).
But yeah it's definitely possible Smith, Dickinson and Askarov fall short of their ceilings. Which is partly why I don't see the downside in slow-playing the rebuild to gather an additional season of information on how the kids are trending and add another top 3 pick as bust insurance.
McAvoy has a full NMC and there is zero shot that he waives it for the Sharks.I'm swinging back to the idea of getting someone like Dobson, Bryam, Miller, or someone established like McAvoy.
Just because Grier wasn't willing to pay Zetterlund big money (and presumably believes he's not a good fit come 26-27 and that he can be more easily replaced; after all, he was kind of a throw-in and I think Grier is confident he can find a new Zetterlund), doesn't mean he's not willing to pay other guys big money. I think that's what he's going for.
The greater problem is that teams don't seem to be valuing futures very much right now. There are almost zero teams actively dismantling their NHL rosters right now. Why would Buffalo, NYR, or NYI even trade those player for futures? Zetterlund had value in the sense that he is a win-now-and-future type of player that those organizations would covet....
In any case, I certainly don't think that not having Zetterlund (and instead having a lot of pick ammunition) is "dire." I do think Zetterlund was traded below market value.
To be honest, Celebrini looking this good this early has shifted my perspective. I have no doubt he's going to develop into a Cup-caliber 1C which is the hardest and most important position to fill. I think this incentivizes us to build a bit more methodically and construct a core of similarly aged players who all peak simultaneously even if it comes at the cost of maximizing his ELC. The cap being set to explode also makes the surplus ELC value less important IMO.What happened to the Sharks being competitive on Celebrini's ELC? What happened to praising the Kings' rebuild? You've done a total 180 on these opinions and I'm genuinely confused what's going on.
Fair enough, I guess.To be honest, Celebrini looking this good this early has shifted my perspective. I have no doubt he's going to develop into a Cup-caliber 1C which is the hardest and most important position to fill. I think this incentivizes us to build a bit more methodically and construct a core of similarly aged players who all peak simultaneously even if it comes at the cost of maximizing his ELC. The cap being set to explode also makes the surplus ELC value less important IMO.
LA not having "lottery luck" is a bad excuse. They had the second best odds in 2019 and fell to 5th, sure, but the only way they come out looking any better is if they'd got the 13% chance of Jack Hughes. Kakko, Dach, and Byram were all terrible pieces. Seider went right behind the Kings pick, and guys like Zegras, Boldy, Cozens, and Broberg would have had better luck.LA did not have our lottery luck so I give Blake a lot of credit for recognizing that and pivoting to spend some of their rebuild assets on bringing in established stars. They also have structural advantages over us by being more of a destination. I would still much rather be in our position but that's because of ping pong balls and not Grier being a better GM than Blake.
I mean, he's a 21-year-old who has already played 50 NHL games. They may not have been good NHL games, but getting that kind of experience already shows that he's well-thought of in some corners and he has time to improve and develop into the 3rd liner Grier is hoping for.I still don't know why we need yet another 4th liner in a sea of 4th liners
I would be so emotionally conflicted.....while playing for Montreal
Everyone looks good on a highlight reel but he definitely has wheels and good hands in tight.
I can see why the scouting department likes him. Let’s hope his skills translate into the NHL.
The funny thing is that if I'm looking at things correctly, he played his most minutes in the NHL this year with...Noah Gregor.I can see why the scouting department likes him. Let’s hope his skills translate into the NHL.
We could have just gotten Ostapchuk and kept Zetterlund
We could have just gotten Ostapchuk and kept Zetterlund
I hope Grier has an answer for you this offseason because I largely agree with the concern. I don't think Zetterlund is too difficult to replace with what we have but missing on Schaefer can be very problematic. My guess is if they miss Schaefer, they're going to hope that Dickinson is what they think he is and see as early as next year. I really don't know what the moves are.And who are we going to get on defense? We apparently aren't willing to give out big contracts in free agency. The majority of good players with term have some form of no-trade clauses.
I went through every team's cap sheet trying to identify top-4 defensemen that had no trade protection, more than one year on their existing contracts, and weren't on ELCs/core guys that won't get moved for any reason. The list is like, Niko Mikkola, Jordan Spence, Alexandre Carrier, Alex Romanov, Nick Jensen, JJ Moser, Sean Durzi, Michael Kesselring, Filip Hronek, Zach Whitecloud, Kaeden Korczak, Trevor Van Reimsdyk, and Dylan DeMelo. And I really stretched the definition of "top-4 D" on some of these guys.
There are several interesting RFAs, but most of them have arbitration rights and would have plenty of leverage to avoid becoming Sharks long-term.
So what are we even supposed to do, especially if we don't land Schaefer? Like, this is f***ing dire.
This is all great to hear, and especially happy to hear he does not play fortniteI mean, he's a 21-year-old who has already played 50 NHL games. They may not have been good NHL games, but getting that kind of experience already shows that he's well-thought of in some corners and he has time to improve and develop into the 3rd liner Grier is hoping for.
He's got size, good skating, supposedly a very high hockey IQ, is seen as a future good penalty killer, and is overall just a great character. There's no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water just because we don't like losing Zetterlund.