CanadienShark
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2012
- 40,047
- 14,733
YikesBecause he didn’t score 100 this year doesnt mean he won’t in the nhl.
Point is that Wright has higher potential. Anaheim would definitely have to closely evaluate write to decline that offer
Willing to bet the thought process is:Yikes
On the surface wright is worth more.
Actually he is a 1C. On a garage rebuilding team, but still a 1C with a very high ceiling.Zegras last season is indicative of a good 2C. He could get there next season or he could hit the infamous sophmore slump as teams know how to play against him better. One of the more entertaining players in the league but it's premature to call him a current 1C.
I think it’s pretty valid. 100 point seasons are still rare in the NHL. If he didn’t dominate to that degree in juniors, it’s unlikely he will in the NHL.Really? Because most people would view that sample as being so arbitrary that it doesn't really have a lot of value beyond "players that score a lot when younger can score a lot when older" which is pretty self evident.
It's all good you don't have to worry, the Ducks wouldn't trade Zegras for anything the Canadians have to offer 1 for 1.I wouldn't do it for the Habs.
Zegras is great and will do things offensively that few players can but Wright will be a better all round player with a lot less offensive production. Zegras likely will be better long term but Habs need solid two-way down the middle. I'd give up anything but 1oa (and Suzuki for selfish reasons) for Zegras though.
Zegras has a great chance of being the better player but hes better suited to avoid the Montreal media.
Zegras is the type of player who would shine in that type of media city to be honest.I wouldn't do it for the Habs.
Zegras is great and will do things offensively that few players can but Wright will be a better all round player with a lot less offensive production. Zegras likely will be better long term but Habs need solid two-way down the middle. I'd give up anything but 1oa (and Suzuki for selfish reasons) for Zegras though.
Zegras has a great chance of being the better player but hes better suited to avoid the Montreal media.
That's not a hot take. McTavish and Wright are similar prospects at this point, McTavish having the better shot & heavier game and Wright having the better defensive game & a little better skating.Heres a hot take
I think mctavish for Wright is closer than zegras for wright.
Nathan MacKinnon had season that could have been 100 pts if he played 82 games (and he will do it)I would say the fact that no center from the CHL has scored >100 points in the NHL without doing so in their CHL draft year tells me it's worth mentioning.
Lmao, is Shane Wright your son or something? Take your bias glasses offNo thanks as a Habs fans
Huh lolololChange the number to even 10 or 15 or 20 if you like.
ATOI means he's had plenty of opportunity with many people, the linemates argument holds less weight opposed to someone who's played say 14 minutes a game.
It's 21 per my updated post above. So that puts him 33rd despite <18 mins a game. Still ahead of guys like Barzal, O'Reilly, Suzuki, and Hertl.
And yeah, he had opportunities to play with tons of other players, like Nick Deslauriers and Derek Grant...
I prefer the player I project Wright to be then what I project Zegras to be, not more complicated then that.Lmao, is Shane Wright your son or something? Take your bias glasses off
What is there to evaluate....Because he didn’t score 100 this year doesnt mean he won’t in the nhl.
Point is that Wright has higher potential. Anaheim would definitely have to closely evaluate write to decline that offer
Sure, he also only played 44 games in his draft year. Would have likely broken 100 points before his 60th game....Nathan MacKinnon had season that could have been 100 pts if he played 82 games (and he will do it)
Never scored more then 80 pts in the CHL
If Wright would have played all the 68 games, he would probably have broken the 100 pts him tooSure, he also only played 44 games in his draft year. Would have likely broken 100 points before his 60th game....
I think it’s pretty valid. 100 point seasons are still rare in the NHL. If he didn’t dominate to that degree in juniors, it’s unlikely he will in the NHL.
So wright is going to be an 80-85 point 2 way center with "intangibles"?If Wright would have played all the 68 games, he would probably have broken the 100 pts him too
At the end of the day, I don't think Wright will be a 100 pts player but I value more a 80-85 pts player with a great 2 way game and great intangible (what I see in Wright) then a 100 pts unidimensional player.
Zegras is an offensive dynamo, but he's not a great 2 way player. it's really nothing against Zegras, I think he's perfect for your market, I just prefer WrightSo wright is going to be an 80-85 point 2 way center with "intangibles"?
And zegras is 1 dimensional?
He’s to old to improveSo wright is going to be an 80-85 point 2 way center with "intangibles"?
And zegras is 1 dimensional?
I think hes bad in his own end... solid in neutral zone + forecheck. I also think he knows where his weaknesses are, and will put the effort in to improve those parts of his games. Personally not to worried about it, he spent most of the season playing with AHL players/ and bottom 6 players.Zegras is an offensive dynamo, but he's not a great 2 way player. it's really nothing against Zegras, I think he's perfect for your market, I just prefer Wright
i forget 21 is the new 34He’s to old to improve
Where did I said Zegras can't improve or that he was bad player ?I think hes bad in his own end... solid in neutral zone + forecheck. I also think he knows where his weaknesses are, and will put the effort in to improve those parts of his games. Personally not to worried about it, he spent most of the season playing with AHL players/ and bottom 6 players.
i forget 21 is the new 34