CashMash wrote: "As it stands now, if we move him, it's either going to be at the deadline or not at all in my opinion. He is a good mentor for younger d-men, so I think we'll keep him."
I think you're right, but I believe it's more that he would be difficult to move. I just can't see giving up high end value for a 38-yr-old who can't skate. Then there's his cap figure, I don't think he's as attractive as some make him out to be. With respect to his leadership qualities we recently discussed an article written by a guy named Haggerty who stated clearly that it's just the opposite of what you said, that in fact, Chara does not make himself accessible to his teammates.
"Speaking to Postmedia Network late last week, Chara said he wants to play out his contract, which runs through the 2017-18 season, and help the Bruins return to the postseason." http://bigbadblog.weei.com/sports/b...lans-to-retire-before-contract-is-up-in-2018/
It's interesting, it's not, dear me Mr. Chara, it's extraordinary, your ability to defy father time. You're a rare breed sir, truly. No, it's, um, after whatever that was last year, do you think maybe you might retire? Mere coincidence I suppose, means nothing. Oh, sure, but remember, he was injured. I found this to be of interest:
"Zdeno Chara is coming off a season in which he missed 19 games with a tear of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in his left knee back in October. Even after he returned, the 6-foot-9-inch defenseman did not look like the same guy... In addition to a bad contract (which includes a no-movement clause), Chara openly admitted his PCL was permanently torn with “about 10 percent†still attached to his left knee. The 38-year-old blueliner*did his club no favors by*delving*further into the specifics of his injury.*... To summarize, Chara is an aging defenseman with a permanent knee injury and a bad contract to boot." http://thehockeywriters.com/three-boston-bruins-players-who-are-untradeable/
Tell me, what sort of weight should I afford the part that's emphasized? That his condition, to whatever extent, is permanent. Some, a little, what, none at all? I mean, is he even going to fully recover? That article is actually about Bruins who don't have all that much market value, Chara of course, at the top of the list. That talk about getting adequate or even favorable compensation for guys like Chara, Seidenberg & Kelly is totally lost on me. Great if you get something, but just getting out from under those contracts would've been very helpful, it seems. Here's one about Seidenberg, stating that if asked, he'd waive his NTC:
"From traditional standpoints, [Seidenberg] has some serious selling points.*He logs the second highest ice time per game (21:57) among Bruins defensemen behind Zdeno Chara, with 2:34 of that average coming on the penalty kill. The experience is there, and at 32, he’s either in his prime or just past it. On the other hand, his possession stats argue that he’s not quite as effective as his reputation might suggest. More than a few people believe that he has been overexposed at times when he’s been on a top pairing with Chara. Really, the biggest factor might be asking price, though." http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2015/02/20/seidenberg-would-waive-trade-clause-if-bruins-asked/
So even paired with Chara didn't help. You know, these guys that went awol, headed by Lucic perhaps, why did it happen? Oh, doesn't really matter, they're gone now! Right, but did whatever it was that caused the mutiny go with them? How do you know that whatever the problem was, it isn't still there?