Captain Creampuff
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2012
- 10,969
- 1,816
If it's gotten to the point that the player has been given permission to seek a trade (vs the GM shopping him), I highly doubt that he's going to fetch a 3rd. Realistically it will be future considerations or someone with salary coming back.
Guessing it is a courtesy to allow the player to have control over his destination vs being offered to the whole league via waivers? I'm not expecting the team will get an asset in return.If it's gotten to the point that the player has been given permission to seek a trade (vs the GM shopping him), I highly doubt that he's going to fetch a 3rd. Realistically it will be future considerations or someone with salary coming back.
We dont need a guy who spends half the game in the quiet room getting checked out.Any interest in David Backes from EDM in a Kassian deal?
EDM would have to add though.
Any interest in David Backes from EDM in a Kassian deal?
EDM would have to add though.
Add? You're right. Additional unwanted salary.Any interest in David Backes from EDM in a Kassian deal?
EDM would have to add though.
Nope. Contract sucks. And he seems to be getting embarrassed a lot more as he ages. I mean Benning walloped him.... and we think lowly of Benning.
I tend to agree. However, there seems to be more than just 1 that posts like this, so you can't just say it's 1 lol. Same can be said about Oilers fans too unfortunately.
Namestnikov or Spooner for Kassian?
I ****ing hate Kassian.
My initial reaction is hell yes, but i'm really unsure if either guys situation. Namestnikov has terrible numbers as a ranger, spooner has bad numbers this year. Have they both been so bad they're only worth Kassian?
Thank you for being a voice of reason.Zack Kassian is terrible and you are willing to pay a 3rd or 4th for him? Edmonton would have to pay us before we should even consider him. Get over this toughness thing, Kassian makes our team worse and will likely end up on waivers before he gets dealt for anything of value.
Reactions like this from opposing fanbases is the exact reason the Oilers should find a way to keep him.
Dirty hits with the intent to injure are a reason to keep him? Because that is what prompts those reactions.
The Oilers can't afford to add salary, but I think St Louis is a destination that does make a lot of sense. I thought Schmaltz and Jaskin for Kassian and a small add made a lot of sense in training camp but the Blues don't really have a similar contract to send back the other way now.Gunnarsson or Bouwmeester (Bo would have to waive) for Kassian? Perhaps with a small add from the Oilers?
Because if Matthews is hurt he’s gonna sign for eight years at 3 million or so.
So what does it mean? Is Chiarelli that last that he can't find a trade partner himself? Why is this permission being given to Kassian.