You get offered a GM position from 5 teams, who do you pick ?

Who do you pick ?


  • Total voters
    82

Coffee

Take one step towards the direction you want to go
Nov 12, 2021
9,452
8,352
Just curious to see the personality here more in the poster as to what sort of challenge they would favour and what their favourite parts of being a GM are


Following 5 teams

Winnipeg , elite team
Vancouver, rising contender
Detroit, rebuilding with promise
Chicago, rebuilding with superstar
San Jose, struggling but has long-term potential


Bonus if you can post what some of your moves would be
 

MNRube

Registered User
Oct 20, 2013
6,853
4,042
Sharks. Celebrini > Bedard and they have a better overall group than Chicago as well. And less pressure to win, which is huge bc GMs tend to have shit job security
 
  • Haha
Reactions: x Tame Impala

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
157,518
112,759
Tarnation
I would take Winnipeg. They’re playing well, they still have a couple of high-end prospects in the pipeline, and we know from history that their general manager is safe year after year after year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bjornar Moxnes

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,765
6,280
SJ.
- home bias
- build something from scratch - except starting with a top prospect pool and good vibes/culture
- "rebuilding with superstar" applies just as much to SJ as CHI
- great owner
- low pressure vs other markets
- solid, small but passionate fan base just waiting to wake up from long slumber

After that in order: VAN, CHI, DET, WIN.
 

IWantSakicAsMyGM

Registered User
Oct 13, 2011
10,012
4,261
Colorado
I wouldn't want to live in 4 of the 5 cities, so I guess San Jose wins by default.

They also have some decent youngsters in pretty much every position, and should be able to add another one this year. There's a lot of potential for long term success there, assuming they can add a high end young defenseman or two. Schaefer would be a big get in the draft, assuming he's the real thing.
 

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,475
12,622
I'd take the Canucks job because they're my favourite team obviously. But also, i think i'd probably be better as a guy putting the "finishing touches" on a team with those core building blocks already in place.


Detroit is also pretty attractive though, because you get to sit back and either reap the rewards of what StevieY has drafted if it starts to come good...or you probably get extra leash by being like, :dunno: i didn't draft these guys. There's bad contracts on the books there, but i don't think it's anything you can't get out from under, or just wait out as they expire. Problem there though, is you're still really looking for a stud #1C and that's very hard to find. Especially without top draft picks. You're probably just trying to build a team with three 2Cs and hope it works. Which is kind of intriguing as a challenge.
 

Perfect_Drug

Registered User
Mar 24, 2006
16,241
13,052
Montreal
San Jose with Chicago a close 2nd.

Franchise star centre is the hardest piece to acquire.

San jose seems to have a few more pieces in place than CHI, but its close, and it can rapidly change.

VAN
WPG





DET
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee

Akrapovince

Registered User
May 19, 2017
3,882
4,399
San Jose for me, longest leash, great city and some nice pieces to start out with already.

Essentially have a piece at every position and multiple up front.

Shrewd free agent pick ups and trading for players in the middle six with term coupled with internal improvement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee

ponder719

M-M-M-Matvei and the Jett
Jul 2, 2013
8,089
11,330
Philadelphia, PA
The Sharks are my favorite Western Conference team, and the situation is such that there will be a few years of patience while I try to get things in good order. This is an easy call. Obvious moves include Granlund and Ceci out at the deadline, and if anyone is interested in Vlasic, that's great.

If that wasn't on the list, I'd probably go with Winnipeg, because I'm not averse to riding that wave in the hopes of stamping my name on the Cup. Flags fly forever, and all that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee

Pablo El Perro

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 10, 2007
26,799
14,558
Vancouver, just because it's a city and larger area I would like to visit. Also get to visit Banana Joe on Salt Spring Island.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee

Coffee

Take one step towards the direction you want to go
Nov 12, 2021
9,452
8,352
The Sharks are my favorite Western Conference team, and the situation is such that there will be a few years of patience while I try to get things in good order. This is an easy call. Obvious moves include Granlund and Ceci out at the deadline, and if anyone is interested in Vlasic, that's great.

If that wasn't on the list, I'd probably go with Winnipeg, because I'm not averse to riding that wave in the hopes of stamping my name on the Cup. Flags fly forever, and all that.
Wow how bout it, Flyers and Sharks! Talk about trying times
 
  • Like
Reactions: ponder719

bov

Registered User
Nov 13, 2010
7,429
3,604
Being a GM in a Canadian market would suck. San Jose can only go up from here, has tons of cap space and nice prospects. There will be very little scrutiny or pressure too, so I'd take them. Detroit 2nd, Chicago 3rd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee

ponder719

M-M-M-Matvei and the Jett
Jul 2, 2013
8,089
11,330
Philadelphia, PA
Wow how bout it, Flyers and Sharks! Talk about trying times
Yeah, proper glutton for punishment over here. I had family living in San Jose for most of the team's existence, and when I don't have another rooting interest, I root for teams where my family lives, under the theory that if people are happier there, so is my family. (doesn't hurt that their jerseys rock.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee

Romang67

BitterSwede
Jan 2, 2011
32,018
26,376
Evanston, IL
Chicago.

1. Wouldn't have to move.
2. I don't root for the team, so if I do a bad job I at least don't ruin my favorite team.
3. Chances are I wouldn't be the worst GM in town regardless of how poorly I do.
4. Chicago is a great city.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrfenn92

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
34,693
38,262
If I go to Detroit, we're rebuilding, so I don't think I'm allowed.

San Jose/Chicago because of Celebrini/Bedard.

Vancouver is a good team and you're pretty much tweaking some things.


Winnipeg would be really hard because it's not a desirable destination AND Chevy has been doing a nice job there along with his scouting staff to find good pros they can get and finding good prospects.

I'd probably take Chicago/San Jose as you're pretty much building your own team as they're still early in their rebuild.
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
75,000
31,285
Sharks. Aside from the various hockey reasons that others have listed, I think it'd be nicer to live in a warm weather market and there's less pressure.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad