30 plus yrs as a GM and your going to get a few walking but i'd like to know who your talking about
Nieds was 32 when he left so i wouldn't include him .
Parise was 28 and i'd consider NJ lucky he left especially cnsidering the deal he signed .
funny thing is Mathews can walk at 27 , Marner and Willie at 28 so i have no idea how long you think Dubas has our top kids locked in for before they can walk
Parise- sub Nylander young player (48 in scoring over 2 full elc seasons vs 128, worse draft pedigree)
Result- 4 year + 1 year contracts combining to current equivalent of 6x5, departs to UFA.
Contract not meaningfully better, player leaves as soon as possible
Gomez- Prime age 1C
Result- two 1 year bridges (current equivalent 4.6 and 9.25), departs to UFA
Squeezes over 2 seasons, second of which is still quite expensive ,player leaves as soon as possible
Zajac 1- young 2C coming off a breakout 60 point season
Result- 4 year bridge (5.5m eq.) that takes him right to UFA
Zajac 2- prime age 2C, coming off back to back seasons combining 26 points in 63 games
Result- big ole long term extension @ equivalent of 7.3
Player has not broken 50 points on the contract, 3 times under 30 points
Barzal- young 1C
Result-7m x 3
Did decent on Kadri and Rielly, but neither had really broken out yet, Kadri had already been bridged once if not twice.
Hell he was ready to walk away from Anders Lee until Panarin balked him and he had to circle back. If Lou followed his MO we'd likely be either in or 1 year out from our *2nd* contentious set of negotiations with whichever kids were still here. Yes, we only got 5 and 6 years from them as it is, but 5-6 years in one shot is a lot more likely to see them kept long term than a penny pinching series of 1's- 2's -3's and a constant media circus. Maybe he would have been right to strong arm them an try to compete with them cheap during team control then walk away, time will tell. But given their demonstrated mindsets his approach would mix like oil and water.