HFNHL Canadiens
Registered User
I don't think Poggemon or Keetley or Dubnyk are good enough to be able to win games.
Poggemon faces 21.5 shots a game with very impressive numbers, his very impressive numbers relate heavily into the fact that he doesn't face very many shots. Canada will likely face alot of shots in this tourney and will need a goaltender that is used to facing a ton of shots
Keetley faces 24.5 shots a game with very impressive numbers. Still, not vey many, see Poggemon for explanation
Dubnyk faces 27.5 shots a game with very mediocore numbers. I personally think that Dubny does not have the talent to lead Canada to a gold medal.
Price faces 30.55 shots a game with OK numbers but he has been playing superb as of late. He faces a little less than what some of the stronger teams in the WJC with get against Canada. He wouldn't be a bad selecton for Canadas starter
Ellis faces 31.65 shots per game and has been argubley the best goaltender in the CHL last year and this year. He is used to facing a ton of rubber and to me would be the perfect fit(but not likely to Sutter).
Poggemon faces 21.5 shots a game with very impressive numbers, his very impressive numbers relate heavily into the fact that he doesn't face very many shots. Canada will likely face alot of shots in this tourney and will need a goaltender that is used to facing a ton of shots
Keetley faces 24.5 shots a game with very impressive numbers. Still, not vey many, see Poggemon for explanation
Dubnyk faces 27.5 shots a game with very mediocore numbers. I personally think that Dubny does not have the talent to lead Canada to a gold medal.
Price faces 30.55 shots a game with OK numbers but he has been playing superb as of late. He faces a little less than what some of the stronger teams in the WJC with get against Canada. He wouldn't be a bad selecton for Canadas starter
Ellis faces 31.65 shots per game and has been argubley the best goaltender in the CHL last year and this year. He is used to facing a ton of rubber and to me would be the perfect fit(but not likely to Sutter).
Last edited: