With hindsight, would you take Cooley over Slaf?

2022 redo

  • Slaf

  • Cooley


Results are only viewable after voting.

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
7,327
5,886
Dartmouth, NS
No. We need size with skill. Slaf has showed he has it. He had points in what, 5 of the first 6 games? Then got hurt. Upon return, he got pushed down to the second line. I can only assume it was to see if he could drive a line. IMO, it was too soon to try that. He's back with Suzuki and Caufield. He is showing signs of getting out of the slump. Leave him there.
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,691
21,273
Quebec City, Canada
Too soon for the hindsight

Cooley had a great start last year then Slaf had a great 2nd half then Cooley has a great start this year but it's too soon to conclude anything. I still like what Slaf can bring to a lineup once he'll have matured physically.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee and SlafySZN

Yasuo

Registered User
Sep 7, 2016
1,384
1,211
Cooley looks like the better pick at this time.

Especially for a lottery pick, stats and production matter. Slaf la Liga stats were never worthy of a top 10 pick to begin with. See with Hutson as well the stats were a massive indication.

It's true he produced well for a 19 years old last year but we need to remember he did not do anything until being put with Suzuki and Caufield. He will be the kind of player that will need to be put with our best players and play the grinder role.

Also Slaf is the perfect example why you don't offer massive contract to a 20 years old for a decent 50 games stretch.
Maybe but there are ton of exemple where it work out and the contract end up a bargain. Look no further than Cooley linemate Dylan Guenther. His contract look like a steal already and the aav is low compared as if they waited this year to negociate. Its a gamble sometime it work sometime it doesnt. But for Slaf maybe it wasnt a good gamble because Slaf will need to be at least ppg for that 7.6m aav contract to be a steal so i dont see the upside on signing him that early.
 

Nicko999

Registered User
Jan 23, 2008
8,159
2,181
Montreal
This has to be one of the worst example ever. Daniel Briere has playoff beast. Pretty sure we beat Flyers if Briere signed with us lol. Rick Nash did nothing in the playoff vs Briere.

I would rather have Daniel Briere in the playoff.

2009-10Philadelphia FlyersNHL7526275371-22312183018

Exactly my point lol. Being big doesn’t necessarily imply big playoffs performer (as people are projecting with Slaf). While a smallish player can be a post season performer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,426
11,991
Current roster composition I think Cooley completes the top six while slaf is our third best winger. But who knew we'd get paid to take Laine or draft Demidov. Slaf is quickly going to find himself out of the top six next season if he's not careful.

I don't think he has the upside to pass Demidov or Laine and even Cole is a stretch.

Now we're at a point too where we may just not finish bottom five so that second line center hole is unlikely to be filled. Most top six c in the league are drafted at the top.
 

Hacketts

Registered User
Jul 12, 2018
1,866
3,549
Hutson is pretty physical i’d say. He isn’t laying big hits but he plays physical, similar to how Gally is.

For Cooley I don’t think it’s a problem for him either, he’s not scared.

Comparing both him and Slaf is early at this stage, though. I don’t think trying to say Slaf plays better with Suzuki and Caufield is some negative, good players needs other good players around them to actually be good. It’s not a surprise that Cooley has been better playing with Guenther, too.

I wouldn't say it's a negative, but I would say that it shows that he's a very heady player. That is something that needs to be addressed, and maybe it is already. I don't know. He's the type of athlete that is probably going to need a sports psychologist..most likely. He has the tools and the ability to become a dominant player, he's showed us that in spurts. He's also showed us how it can go a bit sideways too.

His mental needs to be supported big time imo, for him to reach his potential.
 

JianYang

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
19,832
19,553
Too soon for the hindsight

Cooley had a great start last year then Slaf had a great 2nd half then Cooley has a great start this year but it's too soon to conclude anything. I still like what Slaf can bring to a lineup once he'll have matured physically.

It's also worthy to note that teams very rarely end up picking the best player available at their respective draft slot (with the benefit of hindsight).

In this case, we are talking about a #1 pick, so maybe one ought to have higher expectations of getting the best player, but not all drafts are equal, and 2022 was a class where there was no definitive #1 guy.

The focus should be on picking and developing players who become critical peices to the cup puzzle rather than whether you ended up picking the guys who ended up being the best players of the class. The latter is a game that no team wins with any form of regularity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sorinth

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
79,812
51,769
Too soon to say but I’ll take Slaf. If nothing else we need his size in the top six.

I’d take Hutson over both. Very good chance we got the two best players in that draft. And by the end of it Beck might even make the top ten.
 

DAChampion

Registered User
May 28, 2011
30,230
21,704
Come back when they are are both 24-25.

I disagree.

If you're drafting top-5 let alone top-1, it's critical to get value prior to a player turning UFA. It's totally unrealistic to cast aside all of a player's RFA years. For most players that's both the majority of their prime years and their highest value years.
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
22,067
11,041
Nova Scotia
Logan Cooley is on pace for 18G 56A 74P in his 2nd season already

Curious if fans think they shouldve taken him over Slaf now, especially with the concerns at 2C going forward.

Big size difference, but Cooley's gonna be a star in Utah. No doubt.
Cooley was my pick back then. But I think Slaf is a 50 point big guy.
 

Monsieur Miz

Registered User
Nov 3, 2017
4,577
8,259
I wanted Cooley from the start so of course.

Right now, he's better than Slaf in every aspect. Slaf has the size to play a physical game but he looks more like Drouin than anything else out there. No f***ing idea why he's being so soft this year
 
Last edited:

SannywithoutCompy

Registered User
Dec 22, 2020
2,633
4,969
The difference between Slaf and Cooley this season, is that instead of playing with Dach he played with guys who can score. Typical Cooley point: skates fast accross the blue line, bobbles the puck, linemates picks it up, passes it to second linemate. Another Cooley second assist. Good luck getting that kind of production with Dach instead of Guenther.
Have you ever watched Cooley play?

I take Cooley without thinking twice. Slaf may end up a great complementary player but I've never seen high end tools (passing, vision, shot, skating) beyond size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DAChampion

417

Sheeeeeeeeeeeit!!!!!
Feb 20, 2003
52,591
30,728
Ottawa
Not this again….

1734807420478.gif
 

dcyhabs

Registered User
May 30, 2008
4,523
2,728
Montreal
The habs really needed more size in the top 6, and I think Hughes was willing to take a lesser player rather than unbalance the team more. Wright isn't big, Cooley isn't big, and I think that made the decision.

I'd normally go for skill over size, but if Slaf develops he may be more important to the team than Cooley would be while scoring less.
 

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,749
16,918
I wouldn't say it's a negative, but I would say that it shows that he's a very heady player. That is something that needs to be addressed, and maybe it is already. I don't know. He's the type of athlete that is probably going to need a sports psychologist..most likely. He has the tools and the ability to become a dominant player, he's showed us that in spurts. He's also showed us how it can go a bit sideways too.

His mental needs to be supported big time imo, for him to reach his potential.
It shows that he is a young guy that need some offensive support with him on his line until he gets the experience and then can help others himself. It’s the same for most young players.
 

OldCraig71

Sleeveen
Feb 2, 2009
36,357
58,000
No one cares
I believe they drafted Slaf for what he would be at 23-24 years old and the trade for Dach was to fill the second line center spot.

A couple of years later they made a trade to move up in the draft to get Hage and that move might have nothing to do with Dach not being what they hoped he would or maybe it does.

Slaf isn't playing a physical game right now, he could actually look at Heineman for inspiration how to play as a big man in the NHL, that kid plays like a 30 year old vet. The future is very bright for him, great trade.

I wanted Shane Wright so I didn't really have a preference between Cooley and Slaf. Wright seems to be figuring things out but it's too early to tell how all three will end up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JianYang

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
21,419
11,927
Cooley = Point in TB.

I wanted Cooley from the start so of course.

Right now, he's better than Slaf in every aspect. Slaf has the size to play a physical game but he looks more like Drouin than anything else out there. No f***ing idea why he's being so soft this year
$$$$ and brand new sexy girlfriend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Monsieur Miz

Ad

Ad

Ad